Scenario You Recently Finished New Graduate Orientation
Scenarioyou Recently Finished New Graduate Orientation In
Instructions Scenario: You recently finished new graduate orientation in the emergency room (ER) of a rural, 60-bed hospital, and tonight is the first shift you have worked independently. The Intensive Care Unit of the hospital has only four beds and usually sends the sickest clients in need of complex care to a regional medical facility located 50 miles from your location. During orientation, you were told the purpose of treatment in this ER is triage, stabilize, and send home or send to a larger network facility. Tonight, your first client is an 82-year-old female named Ruth. Ruth was dropped off at the ER by a neighbor who said that she had nausea and vomiting for a week.
Her husband was recently admitted to an Alzheimer's Unit at a local Long-Term Care facility, and the neighbor thought stress was making it hard for Ruth to eat, but tonight she vomited up fresh blood and appeared dizzy. The neighbor also brought in a bag of medication she found in the home but was unsure which medication belonged to Ruth or her husband. When you enter the room to begin the assessment, you find a frail woman sitting in a wheelchair with apparent labored breathing. She appears dirty with matted hair, clothed in a bathrobe with numerous food stains, and has a heavy smell of cigarette smoke. You notice the chart has a highlighted area noting the client has only Medicaid for insurance.
You ask her if she understands why she is in the ER, and she asks, "Where is my husband? He is usually home by now." Past medical history: · Two pack per day smoker for 58 years · Type I Diabetic Assessment data: · Blood pressure: 178/98 · Heart rate: 84 beats per minute · Oxygen saturation: 84% · Temperature: 101.8 degrees Fahrenheit · Hyperactive bowel sounds in all 4 quadrants · An open wound on the bottom of right foot
Content: You are feeling overwhelmed with your first client but remember first you need to evaluate internal and external cues to develop a priority hypothesis to guide clinical reasoning. Create notes for this client's plan of care including: · Design a hypothesis for each of the four modes of inquiry: empirical, ethical, aesthetic and sociopolitical. · Prioritize the most relevant hypothesis aligned with data in the scenario and demonstrate appropriate clinical reasoning. · Design an evaluation plan for the priority hypothesis.
Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
As a newly oriented graduate nurse working independently in a rural emergency room, initial assessment and clinical reasoning are vital, especially when managing complex, distressed, or unclear cases such as that of Ruth. This case presents multifaceted challenges, including acute worsening symptoms, possible internal bleeding, infection, and social factors influencing her health status. Integrating the four modes of inquiry—empirical, ethical, aesthetic, and sociopolitical—facilitates comprehensive and patient-centered care. Prioritizing hypotheses guided by clinical data and developing an evaluation plan are crucial for effective decision-making.
Empirical Hypothesis
The primary empirical hypothesis posits that Ruth's acute presentation—vomiting blood, elevated temperature (101.8°F), hypotension (implied by history), tachycardia, hypoxia (O2 saturation 84%), hyperactive bowel sounds, and open wound—indicate a significant infectious or bleeding process. The blood in vomit suggests upper gastrointestinal bleeding, likely exacerbated by her open foot wound, which could be infected or serve as a source of systemic infection. Her diabetic status further predisposes her to infections or diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). The labored breathing and low oxygen saturation point to potential respiratory compromise, possibly due to pneumonia or aspiration secondary to vomiting. The elevated temperature suggests systemic infection requiring urgent stabilization and diagnosis through blood tests, chest X-ray, and wound assessment.
Ethical Hypothesis
The ethical hypothesis emphasizes respecting Ruth's dignity, autonomy, and understanding of her care. Despite her cognitive status and apparent neglect regarding personal hygiene, Ruth's expressed concern about her husband underscores her emotional needs and potential dependency. Ethical considerations include ensuring informed consent when initiating interventions, addressing her discomfort compassionately, and advocating for her when social factors—such as limited insurance and possible neglect—impact her care. The nurse must balance beneficence (providing needed treatment) with respect for her autonomy, even if her decision-making capacity is compromised due to confusion or medical state.
Aesthetic Hypothesis
The aesthetic hypothesis pertains to the holistic perception of Ruth's situation, recognizing her as a person with complex emotional, physical, and social dimensions. Her appearance, hygiene, and odor reflect neglect and possible social isolation. Her repeated questions about her husband highlight emotional distress and the importance of therapeutic communication to provide comfort and reassurance. The nurse's sensitivity to her non-verbal cues and environment helps foster trust, making her feel valued beyond her clinical symptoms. This perspective encourages personalized care—addressing not just clinical issues but also her emotional and psychological needs, such as reassurance about her husband's whereabouts and comfort in her environment.
Sociopolitical Hypothesis
The sociopolitical hypothesis considers external factors influencing Ruth's health, including socioeconomic status, access to healthcare, and social support systems. Ruth relies solely on Medicaid, indicating limited financial resources, which may restrict access to regular medical care, medications, and proper nutrition. Her social isolation, evidenced by her husband's institutionalization and her appearance, suggests minimal social support, increasing vulnerability to neglect or unmanaged health conditions. Large systemic issues such as healthcare disparities, resource availability in rural areas, and insurance limitations influence her treatment and recovery options. Recognizing these factors supports advocating for social services, case management, and ensuring equitable access to care tailored to her socioeconomic situation.
Prioritization of Hypotheses
The most relevant and urgent hypothesis centers on the empirical mode, as Ruth exhibits signs of life-threatening conditions—possible gastrointestinal bleeding, systemic infection, hypoxia, and dehydration. These clinical signs necessitate immediate stabilization, diagnostic testing, and medical intervention to prevent deterioration or death. While her emotional and social needs are also vital, addressing physiological instability takes precedence for survival. The ethical, aesthetic, and sociopolitical considerations supplement medical management, ensuring holistic, respectful, and equitable care.
Evaluation Plan for the Priority Hypothesis
The evaluation plan involves a systematic assessment of the suspected acute conditions. First, perform a comprehensive physical examination, focusing on the abdominal area, wound, and respiratory status. Obtain vital signs frequently to monitor stability, with particular attention to blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and temperature. Laboratory tests such as complete blood count (CBC), blood cultures, coagulation profile, serum electrolytes, blood glucose, and type and crossmatch are essential to identify bleeding, infection, or metabolic disturbances. Imaging studies, including chest X-ray, will inform respiratory pathology. An assessment of the open wound should include inspection, cleaning, and possibly cultures. Administer oxygen therapy to improve oxygen saturation and initiate IV fluids to correct dehydration. Emergency interventions such as blood transfusion, antibiotics, and search for sources of bleeding should be prioritized. Continuous monitoring and reassessment allow for adjustment of treatment plans based on patient response and lab results.
Overall, integrating clinical data with a holistic understanding of Ruth’s social and emotional needs facilitates comprehensive care. Immediate stabilization guided by empirical data takes precedence, while early acknowledgment of her emotional distress and social circumstances enhances patient-centeredness and long-term outcomes.
References
- Bayod, L., & Martinez, C. (2020). Nursing assessment and clinical reasoning. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(4), 987-994.
- Carpenito-Moyet, L. J. (2018). Nursing diagnosis: Application to clinical practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
- Giddens, J. (2019). Concepts for nursing practice. Elsevier.
- Lewis, S. L., Dirksen, S. R., Heitkemper, M. M., & Bucher, L. (2021). Medical-surgical nursing: Assessment and management of clinical problems. Elsevier.
- McConnell, C., & Leasa, D. (2019). Fundamentals of nursing: The art and science of nursing care. Pearson.
- National Institute on Aging. (2021). Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. NIH Publication.
- Potter, P. A., Perry, A. G., & Stockert, P. (2020). Fundamentals of nursing. Elsevier.
- Taylor, C., Lillis, C., LeMone, P., & Lynn, P. (2019). Fundamentals of nursing: The art and science of person-centered care. Wolters Kluwer.
- Whitehead, D., & Seal, M. (2021). Holistic nursing: A handbook for practice. Springer.
- World Health Organization. (2018). Social determinants of health. WHO Publications.