Scenario: You Work As A Director Of Leadership And Le 457050

Scenario you Work As A Director Of Leadership And Learning For An Organ

Scenario You work as a director of leadership and learning for an organization that makes prosthetics. The organization has been in business since 1999 and employs over 350 people in its Tampa, Florida, headquarters and three plant locations across the Southwest. While the business is currently based in the United States, the organization is exploring ways to move into Canadian markets within the next three years. This year’s employee engagement survey results for the organization show that some leadership practices were rated lower, while some practices were rated higher. The new chief human resources officer (CHRO) met with the team to discuss the general results.

Everyone agrees that the company’s focus should be on both specific leadership development areas perceived as strengths and on those rated as areas for improvement, primarily regarding social intelligence, emotional intelligence, and the interpersonal skills of effective leaders. To help this initiative, your manager, the vice president of leadership and learning, asked you to create an adaptive leadership toolkit that can be used throughout the organization. To begin this work, you conducted a personal leadership self-assessment, and now you will be taking a closer look at these results to produce a self-assessment report. You plan on exploring how this self-assessment would make a beneficial contribution to a personal development plan and adaptive leadership toolkit, which will help to resolve the leadership challenges the organization is currently facing.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The role of effective leadership in organizational success is undeniable. As the Director of Leadership and Learning for a prosthetics manufacturing organization, understanding personal leadership strengths and areas for improvement is fundamental to fostering growth both personally and within the organization. This paper reflects on my self-assessment results, focusing on the Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI) Self Percentile Ranking, to identify my highest and lowest leadership behaviors. The insights derived will inform my personal development plan and contribute to the creation of an adaptive leadership toolkit that aligns with the organization’s strategic goals and addresses current leadership challenges highlighted by recent employee surveys.

Self-Assessment Results and Analysis

My self-assessment using the LPI framework revealed a balanced distribution of leadership behaviors with notable strengths and weaknesses. The five key leadership behaviors evaluated are model the way, inspire a shared vision, challenge the process, enable others to act, and encourage the heart. Among these, I ranked highest in 'model the way,' demonstrating my commitment to exemplifying organizational values, maintaining integrity, and leading by example. This behavior supports effective leadership by fostering trust and credibility among team members, essential for guiding organizational change and growth.

Conversely, my lowest-ranked behavior was 'challenge the process.' This behavior involves seeking innovative solutions, taking risks, and encouraging experimentation to improve organizational processes. For me, challenging the process means actively questioning status quo, promoting creative problem-solving, and advocating for change despite potential resistance. Recognizing this as a development area is crucial because fostering an environment of continuous improvement aligns with organizational goals of innovation, especially as the company considers international expansion.

Importance of Developing the Lowest-Ranked Behavior

Developing 'challenge the process' is vital for effective leadership because it cultivates a culture of innovation and adaptability. In a rapidly evolving healthcare-related industry, the capacity to challenge existing procedures and implement innovative solutions can be a significant competitive advantage. For myself, enhancing this skill would enable me to facilitate more dynamic problem-solving sessions, inspire teams to pursue creative initiatives, and drive organizational resilience amid market expansion plans. Furthermore, embracing this behavior aligns with transformational leadership principles, which emphasize inspiring change and promoting continuous learning among followers (Bass & Riggio, 2006).

Supportive Role of Highest-Ranked Behavior

My highest-ranked behavior, 'model the way,' plays a pivotal role in supporting overall leadership effectiveness. By exemplifying organizational values through my actions and decision-making, I foster a culture of integrity, accountability, and professionalism. This behavior supports my ability to build trust, motivate teams, and influence positive organizational change, which are essential qualities in navigating the challenges of international market entry and organizational transformations. Moreover, modeling the way encourages followers to adopt similar behaviors, creating a cohesive and aligned leadership culture (Kouzes & Posner, 2017).

Organizational Focus Areas for Leadership Development

Based on the recent employee satisfaction survey, organizational leadership should prioritize enhancing social intelligence, emotional intelligence, and interpersonal skills. These areas are critical to improving leadership effectiveness, employee engagement, and organizational climate. Specifically, cultivating emotional intelligence enables leaders to better understand, motivate, and connect with employees, leading to higher job satisfaction and productivity (Goleman, 1998). Developing social intelligence enhances leaders’ ability to navigate social networks and influence stakeholders, which is crucial for international expansion efforts.

To address current challenges, leadership development programs should focus on training and coaching initiatives that enhance these competencies. For example, workshops on emotional regulation, active listening, and empathy can improve interpersonal interactions. Implementing such initiatives aligns with the findings of the employee survey, which indicated a need for stronger interpersonal skills among leaders, directly impacting team cohesion and organizational agility.

Strengths to Maintain

In addition to addressing growth areas, it is essential to preserve and strengthen leadership behaviors where the organization is already performing well. Traits like clear communication, goal-setting, and recognition are integral to maintaining a motivated workforce and sustaining high performance. Continuing to foster these behaviors ensures stable leadership practices that support employee satisfaction and organizational stability during periods of change.

Conclusion

Understanding personal leadership behaviors through self-assessment is instrumental in personal growth and organizational development. By identifying my strengths and weaknesses, I can tailor my personal development plan to enhance my leadership capacity, especially in challenging the process. Simultaneously, the organization can leverage its strengths and target specific leadership behaviors for further development to meet strategic objectives. An adaptive leadership toolkit emerging from this analysis will empower leaders to navigate the rapidly changing business environment effectively, ultimately supporting the company’s expansion and success in new markets.

References

• Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership. Psychology Press.
• Goleman, D. (1998). Working with Emotional Intelligence. Bantam Books.
• Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The Leadership Challenge: How to Make Extraordinary Things Happen in Organizations. Jossey-Bass.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Sage publications.
• Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations. Pearson.
• Goffee, R., & Jones, G. (2006). What holds the modern company together? Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 133–141.
• Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., & Zhu, W. (2008). How transformational leadership weaves its influence on individual job performance: The role of identification and efficacy beliefs. Personnel Psychology, 61(4), 793–825.
• Cherniss, C. (2010). Emotional intelligence: Toward clarification of a concept. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3(2), 110–126.
• Barsade, S. G., & Gibson, D. E. (2007). Why does affect matter in organizations? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1), 36–59.
• Antonakis, J., & House, R. J. (2014). Instrumental leadership: Measurement and extension of transformational–transactional leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(4), 746–771.