Scenario: You Work For An Organization That Has Traditionall ✓ Solved

Scenarioyou Work For An Organization That Has Traditionally Been Very

Use the Module Six Assignment Template to create an updated organizational structure chart for the organization. Then, in a separate Word document, write a brief explanation for your recommended changes and how they will impact both organizational communication and overall team dynamics. Specifically, address the following:

• Updated Organizational Structure Chart: Create a chart that addresses management and communication concerns.
• Explanation of Changes: Explain your reasoning for the structural changes, how they differ from the original, and why they would benefit the organization.
• Impact on Organizational Communication: Describe how these changes will affect overall organizational communication.
• Impact on Team Communication: Describe how these changes will influence team communication and reporting structure.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

In addressing the evolving organizational needs, a comprehensive restructuring is imperative to foster enhanced communication, better management oversight, and improved team dynamics. The current structure, characterized by a highly formalized environment with broad spans of control and reliance on standard operating procedures, has limited employee engagement and hindered innovation. Therefore, the proposed organizational chart introduces a more decentralized and matrixed structure that aligns with the organization’s shift toward autonomy and creativity.

Firstly, the restructuring involves dividing the organization into smaller, specialized teams aligned with core functions such as Graphic Design, Project Management, and Product Development. Each of these teams will operate under dedicated team leaders who have direct accountability for their domain. An overarching Department Head will supervise these teams, but managers will primarily oversee strategic initiatives rather than day-to-day operations, thereby reducing their span of control from broad, organization-wide supervision to focused oversight of specific teams.

Second, to address communication issues, a dual-reporting system will be introduced. Team leaders will report to a central Communications Coordinator responsible for ensuring information flow both within teams and across departments. This role will facilitate ongoing updates on projects, eliminate duplicated efforts, and improve transparency. Additionally, implementing regular cross-team meetings and collaborative platforms will enhance real-time information sharing, reducing misunderstandings and delays.

Third, decentralizing authority empowers team members with greater autonomy while establishing clear channels for managerial support. Managers will act more as coaches and facilitators, guiding teams on strategic goals and resource allocation rather than micromanaging tasks. This shift will foster a culture of collaboration and innovation, encouraging employees to utilize their skills fully without feeling disconnected from organizational objectives.

The changes to the organizational structure create a more agile and transparent environment. Unlike the previous rigid hierarchy, the new setup encourages open communication pathways, teamwork, and accountability at all levels. This restructuring will allow information to flow more freely, enabling quicker decision-making and fostering innovation. Additionally, it supports employee engagement by clearly defining roles, responsibilities, and communication channels, leading to a more cohesive and motivated workforce.

In conclusion, the proposed organizational restructuring aligns with the organization’s strategic shift toward more flexible and creative work environments. By creating specialized teams, reducing managerial spans of control, and establishing dedicated communication roles, the organization can enhance overall communication and team collaboration, ultimately driving greater efficiency and innovation.

References

• Robinson, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational Behavior. Pearson.
• Daft, R. L. (2018). Organization Theory and Design. Cengage Learning.
• Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. Prentice-Hall.
• Burke, W. W. (2017). Organization Change: Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications.
• Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (2019). Job Satisfaction and Performance in Communication Networks. Journal of Organizational Communication.
• Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2020). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases. Cengage Learning.
• Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
• Schraeder, M., & Self, D. (2019). Managing Organizational Change. Routledge.
• Goleman, D. (2018). Emotional Intelligence and Organizational Effectiveness. Harvard Business Review.
• Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press.