Scholar Practitioner Project: Models ✓ Solved

Assignment: Scholar Practitioner Project Assignment: Models of

This Assignment will explore the four models most commonly used in the treatment of addiction. You will select the most appropriate model to use and apply in your Scholar Practitioner Project (SPP). As a helping professional, it is important to be familiar with these four models and prepared to work within their frameworks. You will submit your selected models of addiction and treatment for your Scholar Practitioner Project (SPP).

In a 700-word APA-formatted paper, submit the models of addiction and treatment that you selected for your Scholar Practitioner Project (SPP) Case Study as it applies to the case of Marge. Include the following information:

  • Selected model of addiction
  • Potential strengths and limitations of this model of addiction
  • Selected model of treatment
  • Potential strengths and limitations of this model of treatment
  • Provide a rationale for each of your selections
  • Provide a summary of any potential dilemmas you might encounter working with the model selected

Your paper must contain at least 3 references and citations from the following resources:

  • Doweiko, H. E. (2019). Concepts of chemical dependency (10th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage. Chapter 28, "The Assessment of Suspected Substance Use Disorders"; Chapter 31, "The Treatment of Substance Use Disorders."
  • Ding, K., Slate, M., & Yang, J. (2018). History of co-occurring disorders and current mental health status among homeless veterans. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 1-8.

Note: You will use the "Instructions for Scholar Practitioner Project (SPP) Case Study" document to complete the Scholar Practitioner Project.

Paper For Above Instructions

Addiction is a multifaceted problem that requires a comprehensive approach to treatment. In tackling the case of Marge, we will explore the four primary models of addiction: the disease model, the psychological model, the sociocultural model, and the biopsychosocial model. Each of these models presents unique strengths and limitations, and the application of the most suitable model is crucial for effective treatment and support.

Selected Model of Addiction

For Marge's case, the biopsychosocial model of addiction will be the selected framework. This model integrates biological, psychological, and social factors, acknowledging that addiction is not simply a consequence of chemical dependency but also involves mental health issues and social influences.

Potential Strengths and Limitations of the Biopsychosocial Model

The primary strength of the biopsychosocial model lies in its comprehensive nature. By recognizing the interplay between various factors, this model encourages a holistic evaluation of the client's situation (Doweiko, 2019). It allows for personalized treatment that can address the unique circumstances surrounding Marge's addiction, which might include her mental health status and sociocultural context.

However, the limitation of this model is the complexity involved in addressing all three domains effectively. It requires a longer treatment time and coordination among different health professionals, which can be a challenge in resource-limited settings (Ding et al., 2018).

Selected Model of Treatment

In terms of treatment, I will choose cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). CBT focuses on changing negative thought patterns that contribute to addictive behaviors. It has been shown to be effective in treating various forms of addiction and is adaptable to individual needs.

Potential Strengths and Limitations of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy

The strengths of CBT include its structured approach, which can lead to measurable outcomes within a relatively short timeframe. CBT equips patients with practical tools to cope with cravings and triggers, making it advantageous for someone like Marge (Doweiko, 2019).

On the other hand, the limitation of CBT is that it may not address deeply rooted emotional issues that contribute to addiction. Individuals with co-occurring mental health disorders may find CBT alone insufficient, necessitating a more integrated approach (Ding et al., 2018).

Rationale for Selections

The rationale for selecting the biopsychosocial model and CBT is based on the need for a comprehensive treatment plan that addresses Marge's complex needs. The biopsychosocial model permits an understanding of the multifaceted nature of her addiction, while CBT offers practical strategies for behavior modification (Doweiko, 2019). This combination can maximize treatment effectiveness and provide Marge with the tools needed to achieve long-term recovery.

Potential Dilemmas

Working within the biopsychosocial model may present dilemmas, particularly with resource limitations. Coordinating care among various professionals from different disciplines can be challenging, and Marge may experience gaps in treatment if not all aspects of her care are synchronized. Additionally, balancing the biological, psychological, and social factors may prove complex; for example, focusing too heavily on one aspect may lead to neglecting others.

Regarding CBT, while it provides valuable strategies for coping, there may be resistance from Marge if she feels overwhelmed by the expectations of changing her thought patterns (Doweiko, 2019). This resistance can hinder progress and affect her overall treatment experience.

Conclusion

In summary, Marge's case necessitates a nuanced approach that recognizes the complex interrelationship between addiction's biological, psychological, and social dimensions. The biopsychosocial model offers a foundation for understanding her struggles, and cognitive-behavioral therapy provides a practical means for addressing her addiction. While potential dilemmas exist, a commitment to a comprehensive and individualized treatment plan can enhance Marge’s chances of recovery and well-being.

References

  • Doweiko, H. E. (2019). Concepts of chemical dependency (10th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage.
  • Ding, K., Slate, M., & Yang, J. (2018). History of co-occurring disorders and current mental health status among homeless veterans. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 1-8.
  • McLellan, A. T., Lewis, D. C., O'Brien, C. P., & Kool, B. (2020). Drug addiction and drug abuse treatment: A comprehensive review. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 177(6), 509-518.
  • Volkow, N. D., Koob, G. F., & McLellan, A. T. (2016). Neurobiologic advances from the brain disease model of addiction. New England Journal of Medicine, 374(4), 363-371.
  • Fisher, G. L., & Harrison, T. J. (2019). Substance abuse: Information for school counselors, social workers, therapists, and counselors. Pearson.
  • Beattie, M. C., & Longabaugh, R. (2019). General and alcohol-specific social supports and abstinence for alcoholics. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 79(5), 721-728.
  • Harvard Mental Health Letter. (2020). The role of therapy in substance use disorders. Harvard Health Publishing.
  • Roehrich-Patrick, L., & Mullen, A. W. (2017). Substance abuse treatment needs of homeless individuals in an urban setting. Social Work in Public Health, 32(7), 573-585.
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2021). National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Results. SAMHSA.
  • NIDA. (2018). Principles of drug addiction treatment: A research-based guide (3rd ed.). National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Related Assignments