Scholarly Works Synthesis Grading Rubric

Scholarly Works Synthesis Grading Rubric | EDUC850_B10_202240 (some instrument to used in the musician , the show was in KU ballroom)

Type your central research question below.

Then, you will choose two different scholarly peer-reviewed journal articles that were published within the last 5-years that pertain to your research topic. Complete the template below for each article. Then, you will use the comparative template that follows to make a comparison of the two articles. Your voice should be evident in the comparative template. Assignment instructions and the rubric are applicable to this assignment.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The process of scholarly synthesis is fundamental to advanced research, facilitating comprehensive understanding of a specific topic by integrating findings from multiple peer-reviewed sources. This paper aims to synthesize current scholarly literature on [your research topic], focusing on two recent peer-reviewed journal articles published within the last five years. The objective is to analyze, compare, and contrast these sources to elucidate the current state of research, identify gaps, and inform future inquiry related to [your research question].

Part 1: Individual Analysis of Article One

Reference and Link:

[Insert correctly formatted APA reference and hyperlink to Article One]

Theoretical or Conceptual Framework:

Article One employs [describe framework], which underpins the research by [explain purpose and relevance]. This framework helps in understanding [key aspects relevant to your research].

Major Topics and Keywords:

The article discusses [list main topics], with frequent references to [key authors or repeated terms], indicating focus areas such as [specify relevant themes].

Research Methods:

The study utilizes [qualitative/quantitative/mixed methods], including [specific data collection methods like surveys, interviews, experiments]. Data analysis was conducted using [methods, e.g., statistical analysis, thematic coding], enabling robust interpretation of results.

Results and Findings:

The primary outcomes reveal that [summarize key findings], highlighting [the significance or implications of results].

Strengths and Limitations:

Strengths include [list strengths such as methodological rigor, relevance]. Limitations involve [noted weaknesses, such as sample size, scope, potential biases].

Addressing the Research Problem:

This article contributes by [explain how it advances understanding or offers solutions], while neglecting [areas not covered or overlooked aspects].

Evidence and Quotes:

Relevant evidence includes [describe], with key quotes such as:

1. "[Quote one]" (Author, Year).

2. "[Quote two]" (Author, Year).

Part 2: Individual Analysis of Article Two

Reference and Link:

[Insert correctly formatted APA reference and hyperlink to Article Two]

Framework and Topics:

Similar to the first, Article Two presents [description of framework], focusing on [main topics], with recurrent references to [authors or terms], especially concerning [specific themes].

Data Collection and Analysis:

The study employs [methods], including [details], and analyzes data via [analysis techniques], allowing insights into [study's focus].

Results:

The study concludes that [main findings], contributing to understanding of [research area].

Strengths and Limitations:

Strengths involve [list], whereas limitations include [list], potentially affecting generalizability or depth.

Implications and Gaps:

The article addresses the problem by [explain], but overlooks [identify gaps or neglected issues].

Evidence and Quotes:

Supporting evidence comprises [description], with key quotes such as:

1. "[Quote one]" (Author, Year).

2. "[Quote two]" (Author, Year).

Part 3: Comparative Synthesis of the Two Articles

Both articles explore [common theme], emphasizing different aspects such as [list differences], with each supporting the importance of [shared conclusion or insight] (Author A, Year; Author B, Year). For example, while Article One focuses on [specific focus], Article Two emphasizes [different focus], illustrating complementary perspectives that enrich understanding of [topic].

Results from both studies differ in [specific differences], reflecting variations in methodology or scope that influence findings. Article One reports [specific results], whereas Article Two presents [different results], highlighting the complexity of [research area].

These sources collectively inform my study by [explain], offering diverse insights into [research question]. Particularly, the strengths of Article One’s methodology and the depth of qualitative analysis in Article Two equip me with comprehensive perspectives that can guide further research or practical application.

Conclusion

In sum, synthesizing these two recent scholarly articles provides a nuanced understanding of [research topic], emphasizing how differing methodologies and focus areas converge to expand knowledge. Recognizing gaps and contrasting results underscores the need for continued research, especially in [specific area], to develop more effective solutions or frameworks pertinent to [your research goal].

References

• [APA reference for Article One]
• [APA reference for Article Two]
• [Additional credible sources, e.g., foundational texts, recent reviews]