SCM Globe Simulation: Cincinnati Seasonings Results

SCM Globe Simulation: Cincinnati Seasonings Results ASCM 629 Dr. James A. Bryant

Over the past ten weeks the SCM Globe Simulator has been a valuable resource for understanding the complexities of supply chain management. Combining the insights from the textbook by Bowersox, Closs, Cooper, and Bowersox (2013) with practical application through the simulation, I gained a comprehensive understanding of managing and expanding supply chain operations. The simulation provided a realistic environment to practice making strategic decisions related to inventory management, transportation optimization, warehouse placement, and overall supply chain expansion, tailored around the Cincinnati Seasonings company and its flagship product, the Spicy Cube.

The initial scenario involved a modest supply chain with three stores served by one distribution center (DC). Through weekly adjustments, the company expanded to twenty stores across two states by the end of week ten. This expansion required strategic planning to balance transportation costs, inventory levels, and warehousing capabilities, all while supporting increased demand. The simulation highlighted several principles of logistics and supply chain management, including reducing costs, utilizing intermodal transportation, warehouse placement strategies, and the challenge of scaling operations sustainably.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The Cincinnati Seasonings simulation represents an intricate supply chain network that aimed to efficiently meet customer demand while minimizing costs associated with inventory, transportation, and warehousing. The initial scenario depicted a small, localized operation with a single DC servicing three retail stores. This simplified model allowed an understanding of fundamental supply chain concepts such as demand fulfillment and cost control. Over subsequent weeks, the simulation evolved as I expanded the network by adding additional warehouses, leveraging intermodal transportation methods, and increasing the number of retail outlets to twenty across Ohio and Indiana. This growth reflected real-world challenges of scaling operations while maintaining efficiency and profitability.

Accomplishments

What went well

Strategic reductions in inventory and transportation costs greatly contributed to operational efficiency. By week four, I successfully decreased inventory holding costs by nearly 59%—eliminating 5,497 units from the inventory in a 30-day period. This was accomplished through improved demand forecasting and a more responsive warehouse positioning system, which prevented stockouts and overstock situations. Additionally, the implementation of intermodal transportation—blend of rail and truck—was pivotal in reducing transportation costs by more than 60%, saving Cincinnati Seasonings approximately $42,839 over a month. This approach allowed for bulk shipments via rail over longer distances, with last-mile delivery handled efficiently through trucks, aligning with principles discussed by Bowersox et al. (2013). Overall, these strategies optimized operations while supporting the company's growth trajectory.

Areas for improvement

While the simulation provided valuable lessons, certain aspects could have been more refined. For example, incorporating raw material purchasing, labor costs, and consumer demand variability would have delivered a more holistic view of supply chain dynamics. Additionally, exploring different warehouse configurations or transportation modes such as air freight—although costly—could have offered insights into balancing speed and expense. Improving the responsiveness of the supply chain to sudden demand surges and supply disruptions, perhaps by applying advanced forecasting or incorporating automation technologies, would have enhanced decision-making in real-time scenarios. These adjustments could better prepare managers for real-world volatility and complexities.

Comparison

Week Two's outcome compared to Week Nine's results

In week two, the initial supply chain configuration was rudimentary, with minimal warehouse and transportation infrastructure. The focus was on understanding basic logistics flows and establishing a baseline for cost and service levels. By week nine, the network had expanded significantly—with additional warehouses, regional distribution centers, and an increased store count—resulting in higher total costs but improved service coverage. The trade-off between costs and customer accessibility became evident; total transportation and operational expenses rose from approximately $24,985 in week five to over $55,830 in week nine, reflecting larger scale and complexity. However, revenue potential and inventory responsiveness improved, supporting company growth objectives.

Hypothetical exploration: impact of larger trucks with higher operating costs & strategic warehouse placement near rail lines

Considering the 'what if' scenarios, the utilization of larger trucks with higher operating costs but doubled capacity could lead to significant transportation savings—potentially reducing per-unit costs and decreasing the number of shipments. This adjustment would streamline deliveries, especially during peak demand periods, potentially lowering the overall logistics expense. Conversely, relocating warehouses nearer to rail lines could further lower transportation costs, leveraging existing infrastructure for bulk shipments. Rail proximity would facilitate intermodal transportation advantages, reducing reliance on high-cost trucking for long-haul movements. Applying this change might further decrease total logistics expenses and enhance the company's scalability.

Conclusion

If I were to repeat the simulation series, I would focus more on integrating advanced forecasting tools and automation technologies. Better data analytics could improve demand predictions, reducing inventory costs and stockouts, especially during peak demand periods. Additionally, experimenting with alternative transportation strategies such as direct shipping from factories to retail outlets could streamline the supply chain further. An improvement to this learning experience would involve a more detailed simulation environment that incorporates raw material procurement, labor considerations, and real-world demand volatility—components critical for comprehensive supply chain planning and management. Overall, this simulation has provided a solid foundation for understanding how strategic decisions impact operational efficiency and company growth.

References

• Bowersox, D. J., Closs, D. J., Cooper, M. B., & Bowersox, J. C. (2013). Supply Chain Logistics Management (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & Supply Chain Management (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Harrison, A., & Van Hoek, R. (2017). Logistics Management and Strategy (5th ed.). Pearson.
• Levi, B., & Li, H. (2008). Managing supply chains. Harvard Business Review, 86(4), 124-131.
• Mentzer, J. T., et al. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 1-25.
• Sanders, N. R. (2016). Supply Chain Analytics. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-Levi, E. (2008). Designing and Managing the Supply Chain (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Waller, M. A., & Fawcett, S. E. (2013). Data science, predictive analytics, and big data: a revolution that will transform supply chain design and management. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2), 77-84.
• Zhang, Q., et al. (2017). Optimization of supply chain costs considering demand uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 184, 69-85.
• Cheng, T. C. E. (2014). Transportation inventory and scheduling in supply chain management. Transportation Journal, 53(2), 154-173.