Scoring Guide Toolprintpsy5201 Section 14u02a1 Literature

Scoring Guide Toolprintpsy5201 Section 14u02a1 Literature Searc

Identify a literature search question. (34%)

Determine the scope for LSQ search. (33%)

Identify keywords and databases to search. (33%)

Paper For Above instruction

Understanding the importance of formulating a clear and effective literature search question is fundamental to conducting a comprehensive review in academic research. The research question not only frames the direction of the study but also guides the identification of relevant literature, keywords, and databases. Consequently, crafting a precise, researchable question ensures that the search process is targeted and efficient. This paper explores the process of developing a literature search question, establishing the scope for the search, and selecting appropriate keywords and databases—particularly within the context of early childhood intervention research aimed at improving toddler communication through parental training.

The development of a research question begins with identifying a specific problem or area of interest within the broader field. In this context, the focus is on assessing the impact of parental training on toddlers’ communication skills. An effective literature search question should be formulated in the form of a clear, concise, and researchable interrogative. For example, "What is the impact of parental training on improving communication skills in toddlers?" This type of question provides a definable scope and facilitates targeted database searches. Such specificity is necessary to differentiate between broad topics and research that can be managed within the time and resource constraints typical of scholarly projects.

The scope of the literature search refers to defining the parameters within which relevant literature will be identified. To establish an appropriate scope, researchers must consider factors such as population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timeline (PICOT). For example, in the context of improving toddler communication through parental training, the scope might focus on children aged 12-36 months, with an emphasis on studies involving parental coaching interventions, conducted within the last ten years, and published in peer-reviewed journals. Clarifying these parameters helps determine the depth and breadth of sources needed, balancing comprehensiveness with manageability. The scope further delineates whether qualitative or quantitative studies are preferred, whether to include grey literature or focus solely on empirical research articles, and whether to consider regional or cultural differences.

Identifying relevant keywords and selecting appropriate databases are crucial steps facilitated by the scope. Keywords should reflect the core concepts of the research question, including synonyms and relevant terms. For example, keywords might include "parental training," "early communication development," "toddler language acquisition," "parent-child interaction," and "early childhood intervention." Using truncation symbols, such as "autis*" to include autism or autistic, can expand search results efficiently. Employing Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) enhances the precision of search queries. For databases, researchers should prioritize reputable sources rich in peer-reviewed literature. In early childhood communication research, databases like PsycINFO, ERIC, PubMed, and the Capella University Library are valuable. Google Scholar can supplement these by broadening the scope, although its results should be appraised carefully for relevance and quality.

In conclusion, the process of formulating a literate search question involves a strategic approach: crafting a focused query, defining the scope of the research, and selecting suitable keywords and databases. This foundation ensures an efficient and effective literature review, which contributes to a deeper understanding of the research topic and enhances the evidence base for interventions aimed at improving communication skills among toddlers through parental involvement.

References

• Ingersoll, B., Wainer, A. L., Berger, N. I., Pickard, K. E., & Bonter, N. (2016). Comparison of a self-directed and therapist-assisted telehealth parent-mediated intervention for children with ASD: A pilot RCT. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(7), 2358–2370.
• Kasari, C., Gulsrud, A., Paparella, T., Hellemann, G., & Berry, K. (2015). Randomized comparative efficacy study of parent-mediated interventions for toddlers with autism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(3), 554–565.
• Moore, H. W., Barton, E. E., & Chironis, M. (2014). A program for improving toddler communication through parent coaching. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 33(4), 205–214.
• Shire, S. Y., Goods, K., Shih, W., Distefano, C., Kaiser, A., Wright, C., & Kasari, C. (2015). Parents’ adoption of social communication intervention strategies: Families including children with autism spectrum disorder who are minimally verbal. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(6), 1768–1779.
• Stahmer, A. C., Brookman-Frazee, L., Rieth, S. R., Stoner, J. T., Feder, J. D., Searcy, K., & Wang, T. (2017). Parent perceptions of an adapted evidence-based practice for toddlers with autism in a community setting. Autism, 21(2), 147–160.
• Turner-Brown, L., Hume, K., Boyd, B. A., & Kainz, K. (2016). Preliminary efficacy of family-implemented TEACCH for toddlers: Effects on parents and their toddlers with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1–14.
• Wetherby, A. M., Guthrie, W., Woods, J., Schatschneider, C., Holland, R. D., Morgan, L., & Lord, C. (2014). Parent-implemented social intervention for toddlers with autism: An RCT. Pediatrics, 134(6), 1052–1060.
• Zhou, B., Xu, Q., Li, H., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Rogers, S. J., & Xu, X. (2018). Effects of Parent-Implemented Early Start Denver Model intervention on Chinese toddlers with autism spectrum disorder: A non-randomized controlled trial. Autism Research, 11(7), 1070–1079.