Security Architecture Research Based On Roles

A Security Architecture Research Based On Roles

Security has always been the top issue against the cloud computing, scientific security architecture is the foundation of other security technologies. Comparing existed cloud computing security architectures and traditional security architectures, there are some common ground and new problems. In cloud computing environment, different users need different security requirements, so if we can assign them reasonable authority, there will be great efficiency improvement for data security and system efficiency. Role is an authority division and management method, it gains very good effect for its classification to user and data operations. Inspired by this, a security cloud computing architecture based on role has been designed, the security of the architecture has been evaluated at last.

Cloud computing is a type of service that service vendors provide different types of services by a cluster of servers through networking, such as online software services, hardware rental, data storage, calculation etc. These resources or services are supplied as the way of water or electricity which only to be paid according to the amount you actually used. The biggest advantage of cloud computing is the elasticity of supply and low cost, the biggest obstacle is data security.

The security issues include the risk of privacy leakage and data abuse led by remote data storage, data tampering, lacking of censorship on the service provider, imperfect verification mechanism on user login check. For the data actually controlled by service providers, users have no rights to develop specifications on data management and security measures. So the cloud services providers and academia have designed a variety of security cloud computing infrastructure to maximize the security. These architectures should consider the practicality and scalability besides security.

Role is a collection of certain number of privileges. It refers to a collection including resources accessing and appropriate operating permission to complete a task. As an agent layer between user and authority, role is expressed as the relationship between authority and users. All authorities should be given to roles rather than directly to a user or group. So a security cloud computing architecture based on roles is supposed on the following. The architecture will compare existing cloud computing security architectures first, then analyze characters of roles, including authority division, security requirements division, the security of the architecture will be evaluated at last.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Cloud computing has revolutionized the way digital services are delivered, providing scalable, cost-effective solutions for data storage, processing, and management. Nevertheless, security remains a critical concern, especially given the multi-tenant environment and the remote storage of sensitive data. Traditional security architectures focused on perimeter defenses are insufficient in addressing the unique challenges presented by cloud environments, necessitating the development of advanced, flexible security models that incorporate role-based access control.

Security Models and Architectures in Cloud Computing

In the realm of cloud security, multiple models have been proposed. Trusted Cloud Computing Platform (TCCP), as introduced by Santos et al. (2015), emphasizes trusted hardware modules and trusted nodes to establish a secure environment, enabling verification and testing of security postures. Nonetheless, TCCP relies heavily on hardware dependence, which might conflict with cloud's scalability and cost-efficiency objectives. Moreover, isolation-based architectures, employing logical separation via virtualization and other technologies, attempt to secure multi-tenant environments. Cisco and VMware are notable providers of such schemes, yet high costs and hardware dependence persist. Security as a Service (SECaaS), inspired by Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA), packages security functions into service modules, providing flexibility for users to select security services aligned with their needs, as seen in IBM and EasySaaS architectures. These models showcase the evolution towards more adaptable, scalable security architectures that accommodate cloud-specific challenges.

Comparison Between Cloud and Traditional Security Architectures

While cloud security architectures share common objectives with traditional security—such as confidentiality, integrity, and availability—their implementations diverge significantly. Traditional security emphasizes physical boundaries and perimeter defenses, whereas cloud security prioritizes logical segregation and virtualization. As depicted in Figure 1, the virtualization technologies in cloud computing introduce new vectors of vulnerabilities, necessitating distinct security strategies. Cloud architectures inherit and extend traditional security principles, adapting to the distributed and dynamic nature of cloud environments.

Designing a Role-Based Security Architecture

The core idea of implementing roles in cloud security hinges on efficient access control and rights management. Roles represent a collection of privileges associated with specific tasks or responsibilities. In databases, role management effectively streamlines user categorization and permission assignment. Similarly, Windows operating systems utilize group-based roles, exemplifying the practicality of role management. This concept extends well into cloud computing, where various entities—service providers, users, hardware and software components—must be securely managed. In this architecture, roles subdivide into four types: Service Provider, Data Administrator, Inspector, and User.

Role Definitions and Rights Allocation

The Service Provider role handles infrastructure provisioning, resource management, and service delivery, but does not hold ownership rights over user data. The Data Owner retains full management authority over their data, granting access through explicit permissions. The Inspector monitors operations for authenticity and compliance, lacking direct data manipulation rights. The User role interacts with data under permissions granted by Data Owners and must operate within assigned privileges. Rights are dichotomized into legal (1) and illegal (0) operations, facilitating precise control over permissible actions. Tables illustrate the relationships among roles and their operational privileges, ensuring clear responsibility delineation and minimizing unauthorized access risks.

Security Analysis

Applying mathematical formalism, the architecture's robustness is evident when viewed through the lens of vector spaces and orthogonality. The roles pF (Service Provider), aF (Data Administrator), iF (Inspector), and uF (User) form distinct vector spaces with no overlap, implying that their permissions are non-conflicting and easier to enforce. The probability of unauthorized data operation diminishes significantly with role division, as attackers gaining access to only one role face constrained capabilities. Conversely, architectures without role segregation risk overlapping authority, increasing vulnerabilities, including unauthorized data access and malicious operations. The formal analysis confirms that role-based division enhances security by compartmentalizing access rights and reducing attack surfaces.

Conclusion

The rapid evolution of cloud computing security architectures underscores the importance of flexible, scalable, and secure access control mechanisms. The proposed role-based model effectively addresses inherent cloud security vulnerabilities by clearly delineating responsibilities and permissions among service providers, data owners, inspectors, and users. Formal security analysis validates that role segregation minimizes unauthorized access and enhances overall security posture. Future research should explore dynamic role assignment methods and integration with emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence for real-time security monitoring, further fortifying cloud environments against evolving threats.

References

  • Santos, N., et al. (2015). Trusted cloud computing platform (TCCP): Architecture and security considerations. Journal of Cloud Security, 10(2), 45-60.
  • Hu, F., Qiu, M., Li, J., et al. (2017). A review of cloud computing: design challenges in architecture and security. Journal of Computing and Information Technology, 25(4), 203-215.
  • Chen, K.-Y. (2016). Data security and privacy issues in hybrid cloud computing. Jiangxi Normal University Publications.
  • Li, C. (2018). Security architecture of cloud computing and its key technologies. Computer Development & Applications, 33(25), 75-79.
  • Zhang, T. (2019). The security architecture research status of cloud computing. Safety Broadcasting & Monitoring, 11, 112-116.
  • Jericho Forum. (2014). Cloud cube model: Selecting cloud formations for secure collaboration, Version 1.0.
  • Chuang, L., Su, W., Meng, K., Liu, Q., Liu, W. (2020). Cloud computing security: architecture, mechanisms, and modeling. Chinese Journal of Computers, 43(36), 76-89.
  • Dahal, S. (2014). Security architecture for cloud computing platform. Stockholm: Master of Science Thesis.
  • Ramachandran, M. (2013). Component-based development for cloud computing architectures. Computer Communications & Networks, 28(10), 1032-1042.
  • Okuhara, M., Shiozaki, T., Suzuki, T. (2016). Security architecture for cloud computing. Fujitsu Scientific & Technical Journal, 46(4), 16-25.

Related Assignments