Select And Research One Of The Following Companies That Has

Select and research ONE of the following companies that has been in the news for an ethical dilemma

Create a 12–15 slide PowerPoint presentation that includes a title slide, agenda slide, content slides with bullet points, illustrations, and speaker’s notes. The presentation should explain the chosen company's ethical dilemma, the background, and the ethical decision-making process, including the ethical frameworks employed and ones that should have been used. Discuss measures to prevent future issues, analyze the company's code of ethics, and share leadership lessons. Conclude with key points and provide a references slide with at least seven credible APA sources.

Paper For Above instruction

The ethical challenges faced by corporations in today’s business environment have become increasingly prominent, especially when they involve significant incidents that attract public attention and scrutiny. Analyzing these cases through the lens of ethical frameworks provides insight into corporate decision-making processes and how organizations can improve their ethical standards and practices. This paper explores the ethical dilemma encountered by Boeing, specifically surrounding the 737 MAX-8 Jet crashes, examining the background, the decision-making frameworks involved, and what could have been done differently to uphold ethical standards more effectively.

Introduction

The aviation industry is highly regulated, with safety and reliability at its core. Boeing, a leading aerospace manufacturer, encountered an unprecedented ethical dilemma following two fatal crashes involving its 737 MAX-8 aircraft, which resulted in the deaths of 346 individuals. This incident not only highlighted safety failures but also raised ethical questions about corporate responsibility, transparency, and the prioritization of profits over safety. Understanding the ethical context and decision-making processes during this crisis is essential for assessing how such dilemmas can be better managed in the future.

Background of Boeing and the 737 MAX Crisis

Boeing has been a dominant player in the aerospace industry, primarily manufacturing commercial airplanes, defense systems, and space technology. The Boeing 737 MAX-8 model was introduced as an improved, more fuel-efficient aircraft to compete with Airbus. However, in October 2018 and March 2019, two MAX-8 planes crashed—Lion Air Flight 610 and Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302—leading to the aircraft being grounded worldwide. Investigations revealed that the crashes were related to a faulty Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), which was designed to prevent the aircraft from stalling but, under certain conditions, malfunctioned and pushed the nose of the plane downward.

The Ethical Dilemma

The core ethical dilemma revolved around whether Boeing prioritized cost reduction, schedule pressures, and competitive advantage over ensuring the aircraft’s safety and transparency with regulators and consumers. Boeing could have taken full responsibility, issued recalls, and redesigned the problematic safety systems, or it could have concealed or downplayed the risks to expedite the aircraft’s market release. Ultimately, Boeing chose to limit transparency, relying on pilot training and manufacturer assurances, which contributed to the tragic outcomes. This dilemma encapsulates the conflict between profit-driven motives and the ethical obligation to ensure safety and truthfulness.

Ethical Framework Employed: Utilitarianism

Boeing’s decision-making in the 737 MAX crisis appears to align, at least superficially, with a utilitarian framework, aiming to maximize overall benefits for the company, shareholders, and customers by maintaining profitability and market competitiveness. Utilitarianism evaluates the morality of actions based on outcomes, emphasizing the greatest good for the greatest number. Boeing’s approach seemed to focus on minimizing immediate costs associated with redesigning aircraft and delaying production, possibly assuming that the overall benefits of recapturing market share justified the risks involved. However, this approach failed to consider the long-term harm, including loss of public trust, fatalities, and significant financial repercussions.

Should Have Used: Deontological Ethics

Deontological ethics emphasizes duty and principle over outcomes, asserting that organizations have a moral obligation to adhere to safety standards, transparency, and honesty regardless of consequences. If Boeing had applied deontological principles, it would have prioritized the intrinsic duty to uphold safety regulations and truthful communication with regulators and the public, even if doing so delayed product release or increased costs. Applying a deontological framework might have led Boeing to invest in redesigning the MCAS system properly, provide comprehensive pilot training, and disclose all safety concerns openly. Such actions might have prevented the crashes and maintained Boeing’s moral integrity.

Preventive Measures for Future Ethical Conduct

To prevent similar ethical failures, Boeing and other corporations should implement several measures. First, establishing an independent ethics oversight board can ensure decisions are scrutinized from a moral perspective rather than solely from financial or operational angles. Second, fostering a corporate culture that encourages transparency, whistleblowing, and accountability is crucial. Third, integrating ethics into training programs for executives and engineers will reinforce the importance of safety and honesty. Fourth, adopting comprehensive risk assessment protocols and ensuring compliance with high safety standards before product deployment are essential. Finally, strengthening engagement with regulators and the public can build trust and promote ethical accountability.

Analysis of the Company’s Code of Ethics

While Boeing has a code of ethics emphasizing safety, integrity, and accountability, the incidents reveal that these principles were compromised in practice. The apparent gap between policy and implementation suggests that organizational pressures—such as meeting deadlines and financial targets—undermined ethical commitments. Effective ethics programs require not only written policies but also consistent enforcement and an environment where employees feel safe to report concerns. When these ethical principles are sidelined, it leads to disastrous consequences, as was evident in the Boeing 737 MAX case.

Leadership Lessons

Leaders in business should learn the importance of integrating ethical considerations into strategic decision-making. Transparency and a culture that values safety and integrity over short-term gains are vital. Ethical leadership involves standing against pressure to compromise safety for profit, fostering open communication, and making decisions rooted in moral principles. The Boeing crisis underscores that neglecting ethics can inflict long-term damage to reputation, financial stability, and trust—assets far more valuable than short-term profits.

Conclusion

The Boeing 737 MAX crisis demonstrates how ethical failures stem from prioritizing financial and operational objectives over safety and truthful communication. Utilizing frameworks like deontological ethics in decision-making could have prevented the tragedies and preserved Boeing’s reputation. Moving forward, companies must embed ethical principles into their corporate culture, enhance transparency, and reinforce their commitment to public safety. Ethical leadership and robust oversight are critical to prevent such crises, ensuring that business decisions align with moral responsibilities and societal values.

References

  • Bivins, T. (2020). Ethical dilemmas in corporate decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(2), 253-268.
  • Cavusoglu, H., & Roca, J. (2021). Corporate ethics and safety management: Lessons from the Boeing 737 MAX crisis. Safety Science, 137, 105192.
  • Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.
  • Hansson, S. O. (2021). Ethical frameworks and decision analysis. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 18(4), 415-441.
  • Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366-395.
  • Li, Y., & Tang, Y. (2019). Corporate responsibility and safety in the aerospace industry. Journal of Business Research, 102, 215-226.
  • Sandel, M. J. (2013). What money can't buy: The moral limits of markets. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Silberhorn, C., & Woods, T. (2020). Corporate ethics in high-stakes industries. Business Ethics Quarterly, 30(2), 231-254.
  • Valentin, D. (2017). Ethical decision-making models and organizational success. Journal of Management Development, 36(3), 392-404.
  • Williams, G. (2018). Leadership and ethics in crisis management. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(2), 211-226.

Related Assignments