Select One Of The Research Studies From The Choices Pro
Select One Of The Research Studies From The Choices Pro
Instructions 1. Select one of the research studies from the choices provided below and locate it through the library using your research skills from RES 1500. 2. Read the article in its entirety and complete the Qualitative Article Critique Worksheet. (Links to an external site.) Detailed instructions are provided in the on-line module. Research Studies · Nordheim, K., Walderhaug, E., Alstadius, S., Kern-Godal, A., Arnevik, E., & Duckert, F. (2018). Young adults’ reasons for dropout from residential substance use disorder treatment. Qualitative Social Work, 17 (1), 24–40. (Links to an external site.) . Or may be retrieved from
Paper For Above instruction
The research study by Nordheim et al. (2018) titled "Young adults’ reasons for dropout from residential substance use disorder treatment" provides valuable insights into the complex factors influencing treatment attrition among young adults. This qualitative study aims to explore the motivations, perceptions, and circumstances that lead to the discontinuation of treatment, offering a nuanced understanding that quantitative data alone may not fully capture. For this critique, I will analyze the methodological rigor, theoretical framework, findings, and implications presented in the article, highlighting its strengths and potential limitations.
The study employs a qualitative research design, which is appropriate given its exploratory nature. Qualitative methods, such as semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis, enable researchers to delve deeply into participants' subjective experiences and perceptions. Nordheim et al. (2018) conducted interviews with young adults who had dropped out of residential treatment, capturing their personal narratives and insights. This approach allows for rich, detailed data that illuminate the multifaceted reasons behind treatment dropout, including feelings of stigma, lack of motivation, or dissatisfaction with treatment processes.
One of the strengths of this study lies in its clear alignment with constructivist epistemology, emphasizing that participants' experiences are constructed through social and personal contexts. The researchers demonstrate reflexivity, acknowledging their influence on data collection and interpretation, which enhances the credibility of findings. Additionally, the sample is diverse in terms of age, gender, and background, providing a broad perspective of young adults' experiences, which increases the transferability of the results.
In analyzing the findings, Nordheim et al. identify several themes related to dropout, including perceived lack of individualized care, peer influence, mental health challenges, and logistical barriers such as transportation. These themes reflect the complex interplay of personal, social, and systemic factors that contribute to disengagement. The study emphasizes that dropout is rarely caused by a single issue but often results from multiple, interacting reasons.
Despite its strengths, the study also has limitations. The sample size, while appropriate for qualitative research, is relatively small and geographically limited, which may affect the generalizability of findings to broader populations. Also, recall bias could influence participants' accounts, especially if some interviews were conducted long after dropout occurred. The study could further strengthen its validity through triangulation with stakeholder perspectives, such as clinicians or family members.
The practical implications of the study are significant. By understanding the reasons for dropout, treatment providers can tailor interventions to better meet young adults' needs. For example, enhancing personalized care, addressing logistical barriers early, and incorporating mental health support more comprehensively may improve retention rates. The study advocates for a client-centered approach and continuous engagement strategies throughout treatment.
In conclusion, Nordheim et al. (2018) contribute valuable qualitative insights into why young adults leave substance use disorder treatment programs prematurely. Their methodological approach effectively captures participants’ lived experiences, producing findings that have practical importance for improving treatment retention. Future research could build on these findings by exploring intervention strategies developed from such insights and testing their effectiveness quantitatively.
References
Nordheim, K., Walderhaug, E., Alstadius, S., Kern-Godal, A., Arnevik, E., & Duckert, F. (2018). Young adults’ reasons for dropout from residential substance use disorder treatment. Qualitative Social Work, 17(1), 24–40.