Select Two Articles From The List Below And In 1-2 Pages ✓ Solved

Select two articles from the list below and in 1-2 pages S

Select two articles from the list below and in 1-2 pages single-spaced (per article) address the following: Include the full reference for the article using the writing style specific to your program on the title page. Criminal Justice = APA International Relations, National Security, Military Studies, and Intelligence Studies = Turabian. Since multiple writing styles are in use within this course, on your title page, please note which style you are using within your assignment. The style you use need to be the one that is used within your program of study.

State the main goal(s) of the study. Summarize the research design, and discuss the research method(s) used to answer the research question or assess the hypothesis. Summarize the results of the study. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the study's research design. Provide a discussion on how the study can be moved forward. For example, how can the methods be used in your own research proposal? In what other research might these methods apply? Include two well phrased research questions that could be used in follow-on studies to the one reviewed.

Format: You should have 1-inch margins on all 4 sides of your papers; your title page should include your name and date; you should use 12-point times new roman font throughout. Things to keep in mind: Avoid using the first person in formal writing and instead write with an academic voice throughout. Academic voice is usually written in the third person (he, she, it), not first person (I, we) or second person (you).

Be consistent in voice and person. Furthermore, the academic voice avoids abbreviations, contractions, jargon, and slang. Even informal academic discussions are more formal than causal chat among friends. The body of your work should be made up of no more than 20% of direct quotes. As you proofread your assignment I encourage you to work with Belcher, Wendy Laura. 2009. "Editing Your Sentences" In Writing Your Journal Article in 12 Weeks: A Guide to Academic Publishing Success. Sage. This resource has a nice step by step process for enhancing your writing. Upload your completed assignment to W6 Assignment using the filename: yourlastnameW6.doc.

National Security and Military Studies Articles

• Kalyvas, Stathis N. 1999. "Wanton and Senseless: The Logic of Massacres in Algeria." Rationality and Society 11, no. 3: .
• Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Randolph M. Siverson, and Gary Woller. 1992. "War and the Fate of Regimes: A Comparative Analysis." The American Political Science Review 86, no. 3 (September): .
• Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman. 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty." Journal of Risk & Uncertainty 5, no. 4: .
• Sprecher, Christopher. 2004. "Alliance Formation and the Timing of War Involvement." International Interactions 30, no. 4: .
• Morgan, T. Clifton. 1990. "Issue Linkages in International Crisis Bargaining." American Journal of Political Science 34, no. 2 (May): .

Paper For Above Instructions

The purpose of this paper is to analyze two articles from the field of National Security and Military Studies: "Wanton and Senseless: The Logic of Massacres in Algeria" by Stathis N. Kalyvas and "War and the Fate of Regimes: A Comparative Analysis" by Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, Randolph M. Siverson, and Gary Woller. The title page will be formatted in APA style as it pertains to Criminal Justice studies.

Article 1: Kalyvas (1999)

Reference: Kalyvas, Stathis N. 1999. "Wanton and Senseless: The Logic of Massacres in Algeria." Rationality and Society 11, no. 3.

Main Goals of the Study: The primary aim of Kalyvas’s study is to explore the motivations behind the phenomenon of massacres during the Algerian Civil War. Kalyvas hypothesizes that massacres are not random acts of violence but rather calculated strategies employed by armed groups to instill fear, mobilize support, and shape the political landscape.

Research Design: Kalyvas utilizes a qualitative research design comprising case studies and statistical analysis of data gathered from various sources, such as military records, eyewitness accounts, and governmental archives. The study is framed within a political violence framework to assess the implications of massacres on social and political dynamics in Algeria.

Research Methods: The research method employed includes comparative case analysis, which allows for an in-depth examination of specific instances of massacres and their contexts. By assessing the variables influencing such actions, Kalyvas elucidates the strategic nature of violence in civil conflicts.

Results Summary: Kalyvas’s findings indicate that massacres serve dual purposes: they act as tools of warfare while also functioning as means of social control. The research establishes a clear link between the logic of massacres and the actors’ goals within the broader spectrum of political conflict.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Research Design: The advantages of Kalyvas’s design lie in its ability to illustrate complex political dynamics and capture the motivations underlying violence. However, the qualitative nature limits generalizability, as the findings may not be universally applicable across different contexts.

Moving Forward: Future research can expand on Kalyvas’s methodologies by exploring other conflict zones where massacres occur, thus facilitating comparative analyses with findings across different locales. Such methods can enrich understanding and help formulate strategies for conflict resolution and peacebuilding. Research questions can include: "What are the long-term effects of massacres on community cohesion post-conflict?" and "How do varying political ideologies influence the perpetration of violence during civil wars?"

Article 2: Bueno de Mesquita, Siverson, and Woller (1992)

Reference: Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Randolph M. Siverson, and Gary Woller. 1992. "War and the Fate of Regimes: A Comparative Analysis." The American Political Science Review 86, no. 3 (September).

Main Goals of the Study: The study conducts a comprehensive analysis of how wars affect the survival and transformation of political regimes. The authors aim to understand whether involvement in war enhances regime stability or leads to changes in governance structures.

Research Design: Bueno de Mesquita et al. adopt a quantitative methodology, employing statistical routines and analysis of historical data to study the correlation between warfare and regime fate across various countries and time periods.

Research Methods: The researchers utilize regression analysis to test their hypotheses, focusing on factors such as regime type, economic conditions, and the international system's dynamics. This methodical approach enables a systematic examination of the variables influencing regime outcomes.

Results Summary: The findings suggest a nuanced relationship between war and regime outcomes; while some regimes benefit from conflict through enemy engagement or national unity, others experience destabilization and eventual regime change. The study also provides insights into how external and internal pressures can lead to varied results in regime survival.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Research Design: The advantages of this quantitative approach include the ability to generalize findings across a wide array of cases, lending strength to the conclusions drawn. However, the reliance on historical data could omit critical context-specific factors, thus missing deeper qualitative insights.

Moving Forward: The methods from this study can be adapted for research proposals examining the effects of international interventions on regime durability. The exploration of questions such as, "How do economic sanctions influence regime stability during conflicts?" and "What role does international support play in the survival of regimes during warfare?" could be pursued to build on this foundational analysis.

References

• Kalyvas, Stathis N. 1999. "Wanton and Senseless: The Logic of Massacres in Algeria." Rationality and Society 11, no. 3.
• Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Randolph M. Siverson, and Gary Woller. 1992. "War and the Fate of Regimes: A Comparative Analysis." The American Political Science Review 86, no. 3 (September).
• Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty." Journal of Risk & Uncertainty 5, no. 4.
• Sprecher, Christopher. 2004. "Alliance Formation and the Timing of War Involvement." International Interactions 30, no. 4.
• Morgan, T. Clifton. 1990. "Issue Linkages in International Crisis Bargaining." American Journal of Political Science 34, no. 2 (May).
• Belcher, Wendy Laura. 2009. "Editing Your Sentences" In Writing Your Journal Article in 12 Weeks: A Guide to Academic Publishing Success. Sage.