Short Paper: International Comparison

Short Paper International Comparison

Short Paper: International Comparison Write a 3 to 4 page paper (excluding the title and reference pages) that addresses the following: Compare and contrast the justice system of a foreign country with that of the United States. Be sure to address three of the following issues in your essay: Substantive Law Procedural Law Judicial Review Policing Systems International Police Cooperation. You should consult outside sources to ensure that you thoroughly address each issue.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The justice system serves as the backbone of a nation’s legal and social order, ensuring rule of law, public safety, and justice for its citizens. Different countries have developed unique legal frameworks influenced by their cultural, political, and historical contexts. This paper compares and contrasts the justice system of Japan, a country with a well-established and unique legal tradition, with that of the United States. Specifically, it examines three critical aspects: substantive law, policing systems, and international police cooperation. These areas highlight significant differences and similarities that reveal the broader structures and philosophies underpinning each country’s approach to justice.

Substantive Law

Substantive law refers to the body of laws that govern how members of society are to behave—the rights and duties of individuals and organizations. In the United States, substantive law is primarily derived from statutory law, common law, and constitutional principles. American law emphasizes individual rights, due process, and liberty, with a robust system of federal and state laws that often reflect a balance between public interest and individual freedoms.

In contrast, Japan’s substantive law is rooted in a civil law tradition influenced by European legal systems, particularly Germany and France. Japanese law emphasizes social harmony and order, often prioritizing community interests over individual rights. While Japan's legal codes, such as the Civil Code and Penal Code, are comprehensive and systematically organized, they tend to be more prescriptive and less flexible than U.S. law. For instance, Japanese criminal law emphasizes rehabilitation and societal harmony, while U.S. criminal law often stresses individual punishment and deterrence.

Despite these differences, both systems recognize fundamental rights, but their application reflects national values. The U.S. Constitution explicitly protects individual rights through amendments, whereas Japan’s legal amendments tend to focus on social stability and societal benefits, reflecting their respective cultural priorities.

Policing Systems

The police systems of the United States and Japan differ considerably in structure, authority, and approach. In the U.S., policing is decentralized, consisting of numerous federal, state, and local agencies, each with its jurisdiction and responsibilities. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) handles federal crimes, while local police manage community policing, crime prevention, and law enforcement within specific jurisdictions.

Japanese policing, on the other hand, is highly centralized and organized under the National Police Agency (NPA), which oversees prefectural police departments. Japan’s police force is known for its community-oriented approach, emphasizing preventive policing, social cohesion, and low crime rates. Police officers in Japan often engage in neighborhood patrolling and have a close relationship with local communities.

Furthermore, the U.S. justice system often exhibits a militarized approach, especially in federal agencies, with an emphasis on enforcement and suppression. Japan’s police system emphasizes social harmony, conflict prevention, and maintaining order through community engagement and social services, reducing the need for force and detention.

The contrasting structures reflect differing philosophies: the American focus on law enforcement and individual rights versus Japan’s emphasis on social order and community policing. This difference influences daily police practices, public perceptions, and overall system efficacy.

International Police Cooperation

Both countries participate in international police cooperation, but their methods, priorities, and levels of involvement vary. The United States engages actively in international law enforcement efforts through organizations like INTERPOL, sharing intelligence and collaborating on transnational crime issues such as drug trafficking, terrorism, and cybercrime. U.S. agencies often operate across borders, leveraging diplomatic and military power to enforce laws internationally.

Japan’s approach to international police cooperation is more deliberate and cautious, reflecting its pacifist and diplomatic foreign policy orientation. Japan actively participates in INTERPOL and has bilateral agreements with neighboring countries to combat organized crime, but its involvement emphasizes the protection of its sovereignty and adherence to diplomatic protocols. Moreover, Japan’s cooperation often focuses on drug trafficking, human trafficking, and piracy, coordinated through regional partnerships.

The difference also stems from the larger geopolitical contexts, with the U.S. adopting a more interventionist stance in global law enforcement, and Japan prioritizing diplomatic relationships and regional stability.

Conclusion

In summary, the comparison of the justice systems of Japan and the United States reveals fundamental differences in their approach to substantive law, policing, and international police collaboration. The American system emphasizes individual rights, decentralized policing, and active international engagement, reflecting its values of liberty and democracy. Conversely, Japan’s legal framework prioritizes social harmony, centralized community-oriented policing, and cautious international cooperation rooted in diplomatic norms. Understanding these differences enhances our appreciation of how cultural, political, and historical contexts shape law enforcement and justice administration globally. Such comparative insights can inform reforms and foster cooperation in tackling transnational crime and ensuring justice worldwide.

References

  • Chiu, H. F. (2004). Crime, Law and Justice in Japan. Law & Policy, 26(2), 111–128.
  • Fijnaut, C., & van Mastrigt, S. (2017). Comparative Policing: European and American Police Systems. Routledge.
  • Kotaro, S. (2012). The Japanese Police System and Community Policing. Japan Institute of Overseas Environmental Cooperation.
  • McCormick, R. (2018). The U.S. Justice System: An Overview. Journal of American Law, 52(4), 251–269.
  • Saito, H. (2010). Criminal Justice in Japan: A Comparative Perspective. International Criminal Justice Review, 20(2), 45–62.
  • Snyder, R. (2014). Comparing American and Japanese Policing. Police Quarterly, 17(3), 235–251.
  • Takemoto, T. (2011). International Police Cooperation in East Asia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Police & Justice, 9(1), 41–55.
  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2019). Transnational Organized Crime in Japan. UNODC.
  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2020). Annual Report on Law Enforcement. DOJ Publications.
  • Yamamoto, K. (2015). Policing and Social Control in Japan. Social & Legal Studies, 24(3), 319–337.

Related Assignments