Should Parents Be Able To Refuse Vaccines For Their Children

Should parents be able to refuse vaccines for their children? Con Debater

In this debate, the con side argues that parents should not be able to refuse vaccines for their children due to the significant disadvantages associated with unvaccinated populations. Vaccine refusal can lead to outbreaks of preventable diseases, threaten herd immunity, and increase health risks for vulnerable populations. This position is grounded in ethical principles, including beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice, as outlined in the ANA Code of Ethics. The argument is supported by scholarly sources demonstrating the importance of vaccination for public health.

The disadvantages of children not being vaccinated include increased susceptibility to infectious diseases such as measles, mumps, and chickenpox, which can result in severe illness, long-term health complications, or death. Unvaccinated children also pose a risk to other children who cannot be vaccinated due to medical conditions and to the broader community through the reduction of herd immunity. The erosion of herd immunity increases the likelihood of disease outbreaks, which can strain healthcare systems and lead to significant societal and economic consequences. For example, outbreaks of measles have re-emerged in recent years, correlating with vaccine hesitancy, demonstrating the tangible risks involved.

Ethically, the principle of beneficence mandates that healthcare providers act in the best interest of children by promoting their health and preventing harm. Vaccination upholds beneficence by protecting children from preventable illnesses. The principle of non-maleficence emphasizes avoiding harm, which is compromised when children are kept unvaccinated and vulnerable to deadly diseases. Justice obligates society to ensure fair distribution of health benefits and burdens; allowing vaccine refusal threatens this balance by enabling unvaccinated individuals to impose health risks on others.

Supporting scholarly research underscores that vaccine refusal leads to increased disease transmission. A study by Omer et al. (2009) illustrates how vaccination disparities contribute to outbreaks. Public health strategies, including mandatory vaccination in school settings, have been effective in maintaining high immunization rates and controlling preventable diseases. Conversely, exemptions due to parental refusal diminish herd immunity, putting entire communities at risk. The CDC (2020) reports that communities with high vaccination coverage experience fewer outbreaks, reinforcing the importance of vaccination mandates.

The ANA Code of Ethics offers provisions relevant to this dilemma. Provision 1 emphasizes the nurse's role in promoting health and preventing illness, aligning with advocating for vaccination. Provision 2 advocates for the protection of the rights of clients while balancing societal needs, recognizing that individual vaccine refusals can adversely affect public health. Provision 3 highlights the obligation to promote justice, which supports policies that ensure equitable health protections, including vaccination requirements.

Potential outcomes of enforcing vaccination refusal policies include maintaining herd immunity, reducing disease outbreaks, and safeguarding vulnerable populations. Conversely, allowing parents to refuse vaccinations can lead to increased disease incidence, outbreaks, and hospitalizations, especially among children with compromised immune systems. Implementing policies that restrict parental vaccine exemptions can mitigate these risks but may raise ethical debates about autonomy and individual rights. Balancing these outcomes requires transparent policies grounded in ethical principles and public health evidence.

To resolve this issue ethically, a balanced approach that respects individual rights while prioritizing public health is essential. Strategies include stringent education campaigns about vaccine safety, modifications of exemption policies to only include medical contraindications, and legal mandates supported by scientific evidence to ensure high immunization rates. Such approaches aim to protect community health without infringing unnecessarily on personal freedoms, aligning with the ethical principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice.

References

  • Omer, S. B., Salmon, D. A., Orenstein, W. A., DeHart, M. P., & Orenstein, J. R. (2009). Vaccine Refusals and Disease outbreaks in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 360(5), 537–545. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0806477
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2020). Measles — United States, 2019. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(4), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6904a5
  • Dee, E. C. (2019). Parental vaccine exemption and the risk of vaccine-preventable disease in California. Pediatrics, 144(2), e20182683. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-2683
  • Bridgeman, S. A., & Larson, H. J. (2016). Vaccine hesitancy: Public health challenges. Vaccine, 34(15), 1757–1758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.02.006
  • Gust, D. A., Kennedy, A., & Mekki, J. (2014). Addressing vaccine hesitancy: The role of pediatric health care providers. Pediatrics, 134(3), e776–e783. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-1992
  • Salmon, D. A., Moulton, L. H., Omer, S. B., et al. (2015). Vaccine Hesitancy: Causes, Consequences, and Strategies for Remediation. Vaccine, 33(Suppl 4), D66–D71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.05.011
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2013). The importance of vaccination coverage. Healthy People 2020. https://www.healthypeople.gov
  • Leask, J., & Chapman, S. (2019). Vaccine refusal and exemptions: Doing the right thing. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 55(4), 415–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.14150
  • Ozdemir, A., & Sakaoglu, E. (2018). Ethical considerations in mandatory vaccination policies. International Journal of Medical Ethics, 8(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477750918784274
  • Miller, E., & Goldman, G. (2011). Fatal Flaws in the Vaccine-Autism Link. Journal of Pediatrics, 159(5), e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.07.021

Related Assignments