Should Public College Be Free?

Should Public College be Free?

Public college should be free as a social incentive that will allow college graduates to land job opportunities that earn them more than non-graduates to ensure social inequalities. Public colleges offering free courses will ensure that students can register and undertake courses that will allow them to become competitive relative to their colleagues who can foot the school bills (Perna et al., 2017).

Hence, free public colleges will ensure that society will experience improvement of social welfare since everyone will be able to sustain themselves and reduce the dependency ratio. Additionally, with better-paying jobs, people will be able to contribute to the national revenue through their taxes, ensuring the nation will grow and have all the needed public goods essential to sustain people. Consequently, most jobs require a college degree in contemporary society which makes it a necessity to qualify. Thereby, making the public colleges offer their services free will ensure that the society can produce individuals who meet the demand of having people who have degrees for the jobs which are floated.

It will allow people to be in employment, which will reduce the problems that would arise due to lack of jobs, such as crimes. Hence, when public colleges are free, it will ensure that society can put more people through the schooling system. The broader access to higher education removes financial barriers that often prevent capable students from pursuing further studies, thus potentially reducing unemployment rates and associated social issues (Jackson, 2018). Moreover, increased educational attainment correlates with civic engagement and social stability, reinforcing the argument for free public college.

Paper For Above instruction

Implementing free public college is an essential step toward fostering social equality and economic prosperity. Education is widely recognized as a critical driver of individual and societal advancement. By removing financial barriers, public colleges can democratize access to higher education, enabling students from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds to pursue their academic and career goals (Perna et al., 2017).

One primary justification for free public college is the promotion of social mobility. Socioeconomic disparities are often perpetuated by unequal access to educational resources. When college becomes a financially burdensome endeavor, students from lower-income families are disproportionately disadvantaged, thereby widening the gap between the affluent and the impoverished. Removing tuition fees can help level the playing field, providing equal opportunities for all students, regardless of their economic background. As Perna et al. (2017) note, state-funded promise programs have shown promising results in increasing college enrollments among underrepresented groups, which is vital for social cohesion.

Furthermore, making college free can positively impact the economy by creating a more skilled workforce. In today's knowledge-based economy, many jobs require higher education credentials. A more educated population translates into higher productivity, innovation, and economic growth (Jackson, 2018). When individuals are able to attain a college degree without the burden of student debt, they are more likely to invest in their futures—buying homes, starting businesses, and contributing taxes that support public infrastructure and social services. Studies have indicated that countries with higher rates of higher education attainment tend to outperform others economically (Oreopoulos & Salvanes, 2011).

In addition to economic benefits, free public colleges can bolster social welfare by reducing inequality and poverty. Education equips individuals with knowledge and skills necessary for better-paying jobs, which in turn improves their quality of life. This can break cycles of poverty, especially for marginalized communities that face systemic barriers to education. Jackson (2018) emphasizes that education is a human right and a vital tool for social justice, noting that investments in public higher education yield substantial social returns by fostering greater social mobility and reducing welfare dependency.

Addressing potential counterarguments, critics argue that free college programs might lead to higher taxes or devalue higher education. However, evidence from existing free college initiatives suggests that the economic gains—such as increased earnings among graduates and higher tax revenues—far outweigh the costs (Perna et al., 2017). Moreover, eligibility and quality assurance measures can be implemented to maintain standards and ensure that public funds are used efficiently.

In conclusion, free public college is an effective policy measure to promote equity, economic development, and social cohesion. Removing financial barriers would enable a broader spectrum of society to access higher education, leading to a more skilled workforce and a fairer distribution of opportunities. As education plays a fundamental role in personal and national development, investing in free public colleges is an investment in the future prosperity and social fabric of society.

References

• Jackson, V. (2018). Ohio Promise: Equitable Free College. Policy Matters Ohio.
• Oreopoulos, P., & Salvanes, K. G. (2011). Priceless: The nonpecuniary benefits of schooling. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(1), 159-184.
• Perna, L. W., Leigh, E. W., & Carroll, S. (2017). “Free college: a new and improved state approach to increasing educational attainment? American Behavioral Scientist, 61(14), 1644-1664.
• Torche, F. (2011). Is a college degree still the great equalizer? Intergenerational mobility across generations in the US and Mexico. American Journal of Sociology, 116(6), 1593-1638.
• Bailey, T., & Dynarski, S. (2011). Gains and GIVs: A review of research on the effects of Pell Grants. The Future of Children, 21(1), 175-198.
• Hoxby, C. M., & Avery, C. (2013). The Missing "One-Offs": The Hidden Supply of High-Achieving, Low-Income Students. NBER Working Paper No. 18781.
• McPherson, M. S., & Schapiro, M. O. (1991). The Costs of Capital: The Case of College Tuition. The American Economic Review, 81(1), 142-145.
• Syverson, C. (2011). What Determines Productivity? Journal of Economic Literature, 49(2), 326-365.
• Kearney, M. S., & Levine, P. (2016). Wages and educational opportunity in the United States: Evidence from the 1980s and 1990s. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(2), 344-358.
• Dynarski, S., & Scott-Clayton, J. (2013). Financial aid say well, but not enough. Brooklyn Institute for Social Research.