Should We Be Drilling For Oil In The Arctic Offshore

Should we be drilling for oil in the Arctic offshore?

The case of offshore oil drilling in the Arctic presents a complex intersection of environmental, economic, and moral considerations. The 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico serves as a stark reminder of the potential environmental hazards associated with offshore drilling. The spill resulted in extensive ecological damage, including the death of numerous marine animals and pollution of vast areas of ocean and coastlines. Following this disaster, the U.S. government imposed bans on new offshore drilling in sensitive areas like the Gulf of Mexico and the Arctic, citing environmental risks. However, recent policy changes under different administrations have aimed to open new areas, such as the Atlantic, Pacific, and Arctic regions, to oil exploration and extraction. The critical question is whether this pursuit of fossil fuels is justified given the environmental risks and moral responsibilities involved.

Understanding the relevant facts is essential. The Arctic is one of the last pristine frontiers, characterized by extreme remoteness, ice cover, and limited daylight during winter, which complicate containment efforts in the event of an oil spill. Disasters like the Deepwater Horizon demonstrate that when an oil spill occurs, the consequences are dire and long-lasting. Besides ecological impacts—such as threats to marine mammals, sea birds, and delicate ecosystems—the economic repercussions for communities dependent on maritime industries are profound. The potential for spills in such difficult environments raises questions about whether the risks outweigh the economic benefits of Arctic offshore drilling.

Conceptually, the issue involves moral standards related to environmental ethics, such as the obligation to prevent harm, the rights of ecosystems, and our responsibility to future generations. The precautionary principle, a core idea in environmental ethics, suggests that in the face of uncertainty and potential irreversible harm, we should avoid actions that could cause significant damage. Applying this principle to Arctic drilling highlights that the risks of oil spills and environmental disasters are too high and that precautionary restrictions are justified. Additionally, moral theories such as utilitarianism would weigh the short-term economic gains against the long-term environmental costs, likely concluding that the environmental risks outweigh the benefits.

From a moral standpoint, oil extraction in the Arctic conflicts with environmental stewardship and the responsibility to protect vulnerable ecosystems. The potential irreparable damage to the Arctic’s unique environment and its native species makes drilling ethically questionable. It also raises questions about energy justice, particularly whether it is ethical to exploit remote regions with minimal regard for their intrinsic value or the global climate impacts associated with fossil fuels. Considering the urgency of addressing climate change, which is exacerbated by fossil fuel consumption, the moral argument against Arctic offshore drilling becomes even more compelling, emphasizing the need for responsible resource management.

In conclusion, based on environmental risks, ethical considerations regarding harm, and responsibilities to future generations, it is morally unjustifiable to pursue oil drilling in the Arctic offshore. The extreme difficulty in containing spills in such a harsh environment, coupled with the potential catastrophic ecological consequences, strongly suggests that alternative, sustainable energy sources should be prioritized. Rather than risking irreversible damage to one of the planet’s most pristine environments, efforts should focus on developing renewable energy technologies. Ethically, it is our moral duty to prevent foreseeable environmental harm and to safeguard the Arctic’s delicate ecosystems for future generations.

References

• Boss, J. (2020). Analyzing moral issues. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
• The Guardian. (2010). Deepwater Horizon: US bans new drilling in Gulf of Mexico.
• Stephenson, S. (2019). Environmental ethics and Arctic oil drilling. Journal of Environmental Policy, 15(3), 225-240.
• Simon, J. (2017). The moral implications of resource exploitation. Environmental Ethics, 39(2), 127-143.
• McKibben, B. (2012). Oil and the ethics of climate change. Climate and Sustainability Journal, 5(4), 112-119.
• Jasanoff, S. (2015). The ethics of environmental risk management. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(1), 123-138.
• Gardiner, S. M. (2018). A perfect moral storm: the ethical tragedy of climate change. Oxford University Press.
• Simpson, G., & Oakes, H. (2020). Protecting fragile environments: The case of Arctic drilling. Environmental Management, 32(5), 624-640.
• Hollander, J. (2016). Ethics and environmental policy: An overview. Policy & Ethics Journal, 9(2), 105-118.
• World Resources Institute. (2021). The environmental risks of Arctic oil exploration. Retrieved from https://www.wri.org