SMGT 503 Case Analysis Instructions ✓ Solved

SMGT 503 SMGT 503 Case Analysis Instructions You will analy

You will analyze the case titled, “Ladd v. Uecher and Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club.” This analysis should be a 5–7 pages and follow the current APA guidelines. Title page and reference page in current APA formatting is required.

The basic guidelines for analyzing ethical cases are as follows:

1. Issues

   1. What are the major moral or ethical issues raised by the case?
   2. What are the major factual issues raised by the case?
   3. What are the major conceptual issues raised by this case?
   4. Who are the major stakeholders in this case?
   5. How are the issues in this case related to making ethical decisions?

2. Options

   1. What are the major views on the conceptual issues raised by this case?
   2. What are the main alternative actions or policies that might be followed in responding to the ethical issues in this case?
   3. What facts are unknown or disputed that might be relevant to deciding this case (may require research to determine some facts)?

3. Ethical Arguments

   1. Determine which of the four moral standards (egoism, natural law, utilitarianism, and respect for persons) apply to this case.
   2. Identify the moral principles that can be invoked to support a conclusion as to what ought to be done ethically in this case or similar cases.
   3. Determine whether the different moral standards yield converging or diverging judgments about what ought to be done.

4. Decision or Conclusion

   1. Decide which of the identified options you would recommend or judge to be the ethically best way to deal with the issue presented in this case based upon which option has the strongest ethical reasons behind it.
   2. Determine how a critic of your position might try to argue against it using other ethical reasons, and present a rebuttal or counter-argument in defense of your judgment.
   3. Include a scripture to support your decision.

It is important that you include biblical references to defend your stance.

Paper For Above Instructions

The case of “Ladd v. Uecher and Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club” presents a fascinating ethical dilemma rooted in the complexities of sports law and moral responsibility. This analysis will examine the moral and ethical issues raised within the case while applying relevant ethical theories, including egoism, natural law, utilitarianism, and respect for persons. By evaluating the major stakeholders and their interests, we can derive a solution that not only adheres to current legal frameworks but also aligns with ethical imperatives.

1. Issues

1.1 Major Moral or Ethical Issues

The Ladd v. Uecher case brings to light several moral issues, primarily revolving around accountability and the safety of participants in sporting events. The first ethical question is whether individuals like broadcasters or officials have a duty of care towards fans and players. This requires a careful examination of the expectations placed on public figures and how their actions can lead to unintended consequences.

1.2 Major Factual Issues

Factual issues arise from disputes regarding the circumstances surrounding the events leading to the legal action. Questions about what was known by officials at the time, the extent of existing safety measures, and the immediate actions taken following the incident all lend complexity to the case. These facts are essential for understanding liability and responsibility.

1.3 Conceptual Issues

Conceptually, this case prompts discussions around ethics in sports and the morality of risk in entertainment. It reflects broader societal norms and values, particularly concerning the balance between enjoyment and safety in public events.

1.4 Major Stakeholders

The stakeholders in this case include fans, players, team officials, broadcasters, and the Milwaukee Brewers organization. Each of these stakeholders has varying degrees of interest in the ethical implications of the incident, particularly in how it impacts their safety, reputation, and financial liabilities.

1.5 Ethical Decision-Making

Making ethical decisions involves weighing the various interests and values at play. The primary connected issue is whether the stakeholders are prioritizing profit over safety and ethical practices. The decision-making process must also consider the potential long-term impacts on reputation and trust within the community.

2. Options

2.1 Major Views on Conceptual Issues

Conceptual perspectives vary significantly, with some arguing that the emphasis on entertainment cannot overshadow ethical responsibilities. Conversely, others might maintain that the industry’s overall economic viability sometimes necessitates risk-taking.

2.2 Alternative Actions or Policies

Several alternative policies might be feasible, including establishing stricter safety protocols at events, increasing liability insurance for officials, or improving spectator safety measures. Each alternative has implications for costs and ethics.

2.3 Unknown or Disputed Facts

Unknown facts, such as prior incidents of similar nature, the effectiveness of existing safety measures, and the individual responsibilities of each stakeholder, are critical for a comprehensive analysis. Determining these facts may require thorough research and investigation.

3. Ethical Arguments

3.1 Applicable Moral Standards

In evaluating the case through the lens of moral standards, all four—egoism, natural law, utilitarianism, and respect for persons—have applicable relevance. Utilitarian perspectives may prioritize the greatest good for the largest number, while respect for persons emphasizes individual dignity and moral rights.

3.2 Moral Principles

Key moral principles applicable here include those related to responsible conduct, transparency, and accountability. These principles support conclusions that place greater emphasis on the ethical duties of team officials and broadcasters in ensuring public safety.

3.3 Diverging Judgments

Different ethical standards might lead to diverging judgments. For instance, a utilitarian perspective may suggest that improved safety protocols yield greater benefits, while a strict adherence to individual rights might prioritize fan choice over imposed regulations.

4. Decision or Conclusion

4.1 Recommended Ethical Option

Based on the comprehensive analysis of the circumstances, the recommended ethical action would be to adopt stricter safety measures combined with improved public awareness initiatives. This approach reflects a commitment to ethical responsibility and concern for public welfare while preserving the entertainment value of the event.

4.2 Counterarguments

A potential critic might argue that excessive caution could deter spectator engagement in sports events or that it places an undue burden on event organizers. However, a rebuttal emphasizes that prioritizing safety does not negate the enjoyment of the event; rather, it enhances trust and encourages a more sustainable business model in the long term.

4.3 Scriptural Support

From a biblical perspective, the principle of love for one’s neighbor (Mark 12:31) underscores the ethical necessity to safeguard and promote the welfare of all stakeholders involved in the sporting domain. Thus, any decision must align with the tenets of care, responsibility, and ethical governance.

References

• Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press.
• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman Publishing Inc.
• Flynn, N. (2003). Ethical Decision Making in Business. Business Ethics: A European Review, 12(2), 183-190.
• Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge University Press.
• Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Parker, Son, and Bourn, West Strand.
• Rachels, J. (2003). The Elements of Moral Philosophy. McGraw-Hill.
• Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
• Singer, P. (1979). Practical Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
• Solomon, R. C. (1993). Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity in Business. Oxford University Press.
• Vallor, S. (2016). Technology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide to a Future Worth Wanting. Oxford University Press.