Social Economic Status And Diabetes Mellitus ✓ Solved

Social Economic Status And Diabetes Mellitus

Social Economic Status and Diabetes Mellitus. Evidence-Based Practice can be defined as the systems, procedures, and processes that are applied in implementing quality research findings on decision making in the clinical setting. However, EBP has been adopted on a limited scope contributing to a significant gap in the best available clinical practices and those implemented in the actual clinical setting. EBP is essential to delivering health services because it eliminates the errors associated with obsolete information, the impact of subjective errors, and clinical practices resulting from unsubstantiated experiences.

Due to rapid advances in medical knowledge about advancements in the treatments of Diabetes mellitus patients, suitable change models are required to implement rising changes and improvements in clinical practice. Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation Model is an appropriate model for implementing desired changes for Diabetes Mellitus patients because it is effective across multiple clinical settings. The first phase in the implementation of the Rogers Diffusion of Innovation Model is knowledge. In this phase, employees or associated personnel are educated about the functions and mechanisms involved in adopting innovative systems. Persuasion is the second phase, which entails creating individual perceptions about innovations' attributes about the complexity and relative advantage of specific systems.

For instance, in a hospital setting, if nurses perceive a new patient-records management system that a hospital is planning on adopting as complex, they are likely to prefer older systems over new systems. Decision is the third phase of this model. Individuals make the final decisions on whether to dismiss or embrace an innovative system in this phase. The final step involves either adoption or dismissal. If employees consider innovation as advantageous, they'll accept its integration into clinical systems.

In contrast, if they feel a system to be too expensive or too complicated, the possibilities of dismissing its application are high. Proposed changes for improving people's social experiences suffering from diabetes Mellitus in various clinical settings are increasing funding for lower socioeconomic areas, increasing the number of healthcare providers in remote areas, and promoting health services concerning recommended healthy dietary lifestyles. These changes will improve access for individuals suffering from diabetes mellitus to essential care in their moments of need.

Using Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation Model will involve five phases. In the first phase, the community and members of the healthcare system will be educated on the proposed solutions' reasons and benefits. The second phase will involve persuading people in the community and the healthcare system to participate in implementing these solutions. In the third phase, records will be taken on the willing participants of the model. The final phase is the decision or dismissal. Cooperation will be encouraged between healthcare givers and the community who have accepted the implementation of these solutions. For instance, hospital caregivers will be encouraged to conduct home visits, and the individuals suffering from diabetes mellitus will be asked to consider receiving treatment at home.

The decisions of nurses and type 2 patients who chose not to participate in the program will also be respected. Implementing the Rogers Diffusion of Innovation Model in these proposed solutions to treat diabetes mellitus patients is expected to produce favorable outcomes. For instance, the prevalence of diabetes type 2 in rural areas is expected to reduce due to improved access to nutritional practices, good education on healthcare, and better healthcare access. Reduced type 2 diabetes cases are also expected to decrease due to the efforts to achieve healthcare equity in remote populations. This process's common barriers include limited training for nurses on providing care to people in remote areas, especially in their homes, and bad time of making consultations from evidence-based research on the most suitable methods of implementing solutions aimed at reducing adverse diabetes mellitus outcomes.

However, appropriate systems will be designed to handle these challenges.

Paper For Above Instructions

The relationship between Social Economic Status (SES) and diabetes mellitus is a critical area of study that elucidates the disparities in healthcare access, treatment outcomes, and disease prevalence among different socioeconomic groups. Diabetes mellitus, particularly type 2 diabetes, has been shown to disproportionately affect individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds due to factors such as limited access to healthcare, nutritious food, and health education. These disparities can lead to poorer health outcomes and higher rates of complications among individuals with diabetes from low SES backgrounds.

Factors attributing to these disparities include limited financial resources, lower educational attainment, and reduced access to healthcare services. Individuals from lower SES are often unable to afford necessary medications, regular medical checkups, and healthy food options, which are critical for managing diabetes effectively (Butler, 2017). For instance, the availability of fresh fruits and vegetables may be limited in lower-income neighborhoods due to a lack of grocery stores, leading to a reliance on processed foods that are typically higher in sugars and unhealthy fats.

The implementation of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) in treating diabetes involves understanding the social determinants of health that affect patient management. According to Avilés-Santa et al. (2020), EBP emphasizes integrating clinical expertise with the best available research and considering the patient's unique circumstances, such as their socio-economic contexts. This integration can improve management strategies tailored to the needs of individuals from different socioeconomic backgrounds.

Utilizing Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation Model can significantly enhance the adoption of effective diabetes interventions in low SES communities. The model's phases allow for systematic education and persuasion of healthcare providers and community members regarding new diabetes management strategies that consider their unique challenges (Mohammadi et al., 2018). For instance, increasing funding for community-based health initiatives may improve diabetes education and access to nutritious foods.

Appropriately, health policy interventions should also prioritize increasing healthcare provider availability in underserved areas. Studies have shown that higher health provider density correlates with improved health outcomes (Greenwood et al., 2017). This can be crucial for individuals from low SES backgrounds who may struggle to find healthcare services locally.

Moreover, addressing cultural barriers is integral to increasing healthcare accessibility. Many individuals from lower SES backgrounds may harbor distrust towards the healthcare system due to historical inequalities, leading to reluctance in seeking medical help. Engaging community leaders to advocate for healthcare initiatives can help improve the relationship between healthcare systems and these populations.

Furthermore, promoting health literacy within low SES populations is vital for effective diabetes management. Effective communication strategies tailored to the audience can empower individuals with diabetes to make informed health decisions. This could involve using visual aids, community workshops, and support groups to foster a better understanding of diabetes management (Pashaeypoor et al., 2016).

The common barriers in implementing successful diabetes management strategies include the disparity in resources and limited training for healthcare practitioners on providing culturally competent care (Avilés-Santa, 2020). Overcoming these challenges requires dedicated training programs that focus on the unique needs of underserved populations.

Healthcare systems need to incorporate systematic evaluations to determine the efficacy of interventions deployed within low SES communities. Such evaluations can inform practices and highlight successful strategies, enabling continuous refinement of diabetes management approaches.

In conclusion, addressing the interplay between social economic status and diabetes mellitus is critical in reducing health disparities. Focusing on EBP while utilizing models like Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation can enhance not only the implementation of diabetes interventions but also promote equitable healthcare access. By prioritizing education, resource allocation, and community engagement, we can significantly improve diabetes outcomes among those most affected by socioeconomic disadvantages.

References

• Avilés-Santa, M. L., Monroig-Rivera, A., Soto-Soto, A., & Lindberg, N. M. (2020). Current State of Diabetes Mellitus Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control in Latin America: Challenges and Innovative Solutions to Improve Health Outcomes Across the Continent. Current Diabetes Reports, 20(11), 1-44.
• Butler, A. M. (2017). Social determinants of health and racial/ethnic disparities in type 2 diabetes in youth. Current Diabetes Reports, 17(8), 60.
• Greenwood, D. A., Gee, P. M., Fatkin, K. J., & Peeples, M. (2017). A systematic review of reviews evaluating technology-enabled diabetes self-management education and support. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 11(5).
• Mohammadi, M. M., Poursaberi, R., & Salahshoor, M. R. (2018). Evaluating the adoption of evidence-based practice using Rogers's diffusion of innovation theory: a model testing study. Health Promotion Perspectives, 8(1), 25.
• Pashaeypoor, S., Negarandeh, R., & Borumandnia, N. (2016). Factors affecting nurses' adoption of evidence-based practice based on Rogers' Diffusion of Innovations Model: A path analysis approach. Journal of Hayat, 21(4).