Social Studies Research 1 Class To Prepare Review 155519 

Scw6301 Scial Studies Research 1 Classto Prepare Review The Learnin


Review the Learning Resources introducing the research process and evidence-based practice. Consider the many ways of knowing and determine which way(s) you rely on most in your personal or professional life. BY DAY 4 Describe two different ways of knowing. Which of these do you rely on and why? Provide an example. Then, describe the danger of professionals relying on just one way of knowing. What might be a consequence of this reliance? BY DAY 6 Respond to two colleagues by explaining how their identified ways of knowing contribute to evidence-based practice (EBP). Also explain how EBP supported by science aligns with the NASW Code of Ethics values.


REFERENCES MEDIA Walden University, LLC. (2021). Evidence-based practice in social work [Video]. Walden University Blackboard. · Yegidis, B. L., Weinbach, R. W., & Myers, L. L. (2018). Research methods for social workers (8th ed.). Pearson. · Chapter 1: Toward Evidence-Based Practice (pp. 1–23) · National Association of Social Workers. (n.d.). Code of ethicsLinks to an external site. . · National Association of Social Workers. (n.d.). Evidence-based practiceLinks to an external site. .


Paper For Above instruction


Evidence-based practice (EBP) is an integral component of social work, aiming to incorporate the best available research evidence with clinical expertise and client values to enhance service outcomes. Understanding different ways of knowing and their application in practice can significantly influence the effectiveness and ethical standards of social work interventions. This paper explores two distinct ways of knowing—empirical and personal—and discusses their roles in professional decision-making, potential risks of reliance on a single way of knowing, and how integrating multiple modes fosters a comprehensive approach aligned with professional ethics and the pursuit of effective practice.


Introduction


The practice of social work necessitates a nuanced understanding of how knowledge is acquired and utilized. Since the origins of social work, practitioners have relied on different ways of knowing to inform their interventions and Judgments. Recognizing the diversity of knowledge sources and their appropriate application is essential in fostering effective and ethically sound practice. This paper identifies two distinct ways of knowing—empirical and personal—and examines their significance in the context of evidence-based social work, the risks associated with over-reliance on a single mode, and how integrating various ways of knowing can promote ethical and effective practice aligned with the NASW Code of Ethics.


Two Different Ways of Knowing


Empirical knowing involves knowledge derived from systematic observation, scientific research, and factual data. It emphasizes evidence gathered through rigorous methods, such as experiments, surveys, and statistical analysis, enabling practitioners to base decisions on verified data. This way of knowing underpins the foundation of evidence-based practice by providing objective, replicable, and generalizable information.


Personal knowing, on the other hand, is rooted in individual experience, intuition, and values. It encompasses the practitioner's internal sense of what is right or appropriate, shaped by life experiences, cultural background, and emotional insights. Personal knowing offers a nuanced understanding of client contexts, identities, and needs that might not be captured solely through empirical data.


For example, a social worker might rely on empirical data to assess the prevalence of a mental health disorder within a community, while using personal knowing to understand the unique cultural expressions of distress among clients from diverse backgrounds.


Reliance on Personal Knowing and Its Justification


I predominantly rely on empirical knowing in my professional life due to its objectivity and evidentiary strength. The scientific approach allows me to develop interventions supported by research, yielding predictable and replicable outcomes, which are vital in advocating for evidence-based policies and practices. For instance, when implementing trauma-informed care, I depend on research evidence demonstrating effective strategies for trauma mitigation.


However, I also value personal knowing because it enables me to connect with clients on a deeper level, respecting their cultural and individual context. An example is adapting communication styles based on a client’s cultural background to foster trust and engagement, thus blending empirical evidence with personal insights.


The Danger of Relying on Just One Way of Knowing


Dependence on a single way of knowing poses significant risks. Over-reliance on empirical data can lead to neglecting the client's subjective experiences, cultural nuances, or emotional realities—elements essential for holistic care. Conversely, solely relying on personal knowing may introduce biases, subjectivity, and emotional influences that could compromise objectivity and ethical standards. A professional limited to one way of knowing risks making decisions that are either overly data-driven or too personalized, potentially resulting in ineffective or ethically questionable interventions.


A consequence of such reliance is the risk of practicing within a narrow framework, ultimately impairing the practitioner's ability to deliver comprehensive and culturally responsive services. This may lead to marginalization, misinterpretation of client needs, and diminished trust in the therapeutic relationship.


Contribution of Different Ways of Knowing to Evidence-Based Practice


Both empirical and personal knowing contribute vital insights to evidence-based practice. Empirical research provides a solid foundation of tested knowledge, guiding practitioners with validated interventions. Personal knowing complements this by ensuring that services are tailored to individual clients’ cultural, emotional, and contextual needs, thus increasing relevance and effectiveness. For example, evidence from randomized controlled trials can guide clinical techniques, while personal insights help adapt interventions to suit a client's unique circumstances, fostering trust and engagement.


Alignment with NASW Code of Ethics


Evidence-based practice supported by science aligns closely with the NASW Code of Ethics, which emphasizes the importance of competent practice, cultural humility, and respect for client autonomy. Ethical social work involves applying the best available evidence while honoring client preferences and values. The NASW standards underscore the importance of integrating research evidence with the practitioner's expertise and the client's lived experience, thus promoting a holistic and respectful approach to service delivery.


Conclusion


In summary, understanding and balancing different ways of knowing—empirical and personal—are essential for comprehensive, ethical practice in social work. These modes of knowing contribute uniquely to evidence-based practice, which in turn aligns with ethical standards set forth by the NASW. Avoiding reliance on a single source of knowledge reduces risks and promotes a more nuanced, client-centered approach that is both effective and ethically sound.


References
  • Walden University, LLC. (2021). Evidence-based practice in social work [Video]. Walden University Blackboard.
  • Yegidis, B. L., Weinbach, R. W., & Myers, L. L. (2018). Research methods for social workers (8th ed.). Pearson.
  • National Association of Social Workers. (n.d.). Code of ethics. https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics
  • National Association of Social Workers. (n.d.). Evidence-based practice. https://www.socialworkers.org/Practice/Research-Policy/EBP
  • Kelly, J., Sadeghieh, T., & Adeli, K. (2014). Peer review in scientific publications: Benefits, critiques, & a survival guide. EJIFCC, 25(3), 227–243.
  • Yegidis, B. L., Weinbach, R. W., & Myers, L. L. (2018). Research methods for social workers (8th ed.). Pearson.
  • Holder, C. L., Perez-Gilbe, H. R., Fajardo, F. J., Garcia, S., & Cyrus, E. (2019). Disparities of HIV risk and PrEP use among transgender women of color in South Florida. Journal of the National Medical Association, 111(6), 625–632.
  • Reyes, R. A. (2015). Transgender Latinos fight for equality. NBC News.
  • UnidosUS. (2014, October 7). Report sheds light on struggles of Latino transgender community. https://www.unidosus.org
  • League of United Latin American Citizens. (n.d.). Latino transgender discrimination prevention. https://lulac.org

Related Assignments