Someday Or You May Ask Your Instructor For Some Suggestions

Someday Or You May Ask Your Instructor For Some Suggestionsin Your P

Describe the practice setting where the proposed evaluation will take place. Include a discussion of the population served and program(s) provided. (1–2 paragraphs). Identify and analyze the main objectives of the human service program. Evaluate at what assessment level if these objectives are being achieved. If they are, describe what makes them good. If they are not “good,” identify what could be done to make them good. (2 paragraphs). Based on your review of the program against what you have learned in this course and text about the delivery of services, describe one innovative change that you could make to the program to benefit the overall success rate of the program. (1-2 paragraphs) Select a research design that would be helpful to evaluate the effectiveness of this program. Explain why you chose that specific design. (2–3 paragraphs) How will you determine the study sample for your research design? (1 paragraph). Discuss any ethical considerations with regard to the participants, such as how you will keep the information confidential, protect the client, etc. (1–2 paragraphs). Explain how you will measure client progress. Conduct online research to determine one or two measurement scales that would be helpful for your research design. (2–3 paragraphs). Determine any threats to validity related to your research design. (1–3 paragraphs). Discuss how you would use data from the evaluation to inform your program. (1–2 paragraphs). Conclusion - Discuss what you have learned about evaluation from this Assignment (1–2 paragraphs).

Paper For Above instruction

The proposed evaluation will be conducted within a community-based human service setting, specifically targeting a mental health outreach program designed to serve unemployed adults experiencing various mental health challenges. The population served includes adults aged 25-50 who are actively seeking employment but face barriers such as depression, anxiety, or substance abuse. The program provides counseling services, job training workshops, and peer support groups aiming to improve mental well-being and employment outcomes. This setting is chosen for its relevance to contemporary social issues, allowing for an assessment of intervention efficacy in real-world conditions.

The main objectives of this mental health program are to reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety, enhance job readiness skills, and increase employment rates among participants. These objectives are assessed through multiple levels: subjective self-report questionnaires, clinician ratings, and employment status follow-ups. Currently, the program achieves these objectives with moderate success, as indicated by improved symptom scores and employment statistics, though there remains room for enhancement. For instance, self-report measures like the Beck Depression Inventory provide valuable insights into symptom reduction, but integrating more comprehensive assessments could strengthen evaluations. If the objectives are deemed “good,” it indicates that the intervention effectively addresses key barriers. If not, modifications such as increased individual counseling or tailored job placement support could improve outcomes.

An innovative change I propose is incorporating a mobile health application that allows participants to track their mood, receive motivational messages, and access resources. This technology-based intervention could promote ongoing engagement outside of scheduled sessions, thereby enhancing overall program effectiveness. Based on current literature, integrating digital tools has shown promise in maintaining participant motivation and improving mental health outcomes (Mohr et al., 2013). This change aims to foster greater self-efficacy and continuous support, potentially increasing the program’s success rate.

To evaluate the program’s effectiveness, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design is recommended due to its high internal validity and ability to establish causal relationships (Shadish, Cook, & Campbell, 2002). An RCT enables comparison between participants receiving the standard program and those receiving the standard program plus the innovative digital intervention, thus allowing for a clear assessment of the added value. A longitudinal component can be included to measure sustained effects over time, providing a comprehensive understanding of long-term outcomes. The RCT design is chosen because it minimizes biases and confounding variables, offering robust evidence to inform program improvements (Friedman, Furberg, & DeMets, 2010).

The study sample will be determined through purposive sampling from the eligible population within the service setting. Participants will be recruited based on specific inclusion criteria such as age, employment status, and mental health diagnosis. Randomization will assign participants to either the control or experimental group. Sample size calculations will be conducted to ensure sufficient power to detect meaningful differences, considering potential attrition rates. Ethical considerations include obtaining informed consent, ensuring confidentiality of participant data, and providing access to support services for control group participants if needed.

Client progress will be measured through standardized scales such as the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for depression and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) for anxiety (Kroenke et al., 2009; Spitzer et al., 2006). Additionally, employment status and job retention rates will serve as behavioral indicators of program success. These measurement tools have demonstrated reliability and validity in assessing mental health symptoms and are sensitive to changes over time. Remote assessments via digital platforms can facilitate frequent monitoring, increasing responsiveness to client needs.

Threats to validity include selection bias, attrition, and measurement bias. To mitigate selection bias, randomization will be strictly enforced, and baseline equivalence will be confirmed. Attrition may threaten internal validity if dropout rates differ between groups; strategies such as engagement incentives and regular follow-ups can reduce this risk. Measurement bias may occur if scales are not applied consistently; training evaluators and employing standardized procedures will minimize this threat. External validity could be limited if the sample is not representative; thus, careful sampling and descriptive analysis will help generalize findings.

The evaluation data will inform program decision-making by highlighting successful components and identifying areas needing improvement. Quantitative results can demonstrate whether the digital intervention significantly enhances mental health outcomes and employment rates. Qualitative feedback from participants will also provide context for interpreting these findings. Utilizing this data, program administrators can refine intervention strategies, allocate resources more effectively, and develop targeted support mechanisms to maximize positive outcomes. Continuous evaluation ensures the program adapts to emerging needs and promotes evidence-based practices.

From this assignment, I have learned that evaluation is a critical aspect of program development, providing a systematic approach to measure effectiveness and guide improvements. Effective evaluation requires careful planning, selecting appropriate research designs, and considering ethical implications. It also emphasizes the importance of utilizing reliable measurement tools and addressing potential threats to validity. Overall, evaluation serves as a foundation for enhancing service quality and achieving desired outcomes in human services settings.

References

• Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C., & DeMets, D. L. (2010). Fundamentals of Clinical Trials. Springer.
• Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2009). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606-613.
• Mohr, D. C., Burns, M. N., Schueller, S. M., et al. (2013). Behavioral intervention technologies: Evidence review and recommendations. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(3), 156-168.
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin.
• Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(10), 1092-1097.