Spring 2016 Lisa M. Bartone JD How To Brief A Case 836246

Spring 2016lisa M Bartone Jdhow To Brief A Casecase Briefs

Lisa M. Bartone's guide on how to brief a case explains the process of creating case briefs, which are summaries of court opinions. The purpose of briefing is to condense lengthy cases into key components, focusing on essential facts, procedural history, issue(s), holding, rationale, rule of law, and any dissenting or concurring opinions. Before writing the brief, it is crucial to read the entire case carefully, identify the involved parties, understand what the case is about, determine the court's question, and how it was resolved. The case name and citation should be placed at the top, followed by clearly labeled sections for facts, procedural history, issues, holdings, rationale, rule of law, dissent, and concurring opinions if applicable. The facts section should include all relevant details that the court relied on, but only those that are essential for understanding the decision. The procedural history describes how the case reached the current court. The issue section should pose a clear, concise question, usually a single sentence. The holding answers this question directly, starting with "yes" or "no." The rationale explains the court’s reasoning, referencing applicable legal authority such as statutes, case law, or constitutional provisions. The rule of law abstracts the general legal principle illustrated by the case. Dissenting and concurring opinions should be included only if they are part of the decision. The final advice emphasizes that case briefing improves with practice, and that only published or posted decisions should be used. Review and ensure your brief encompasses all relevant points, avoiding unnecessary details.

Paper For Above instruction

Briefing a case is an essential skill in legal studies that involves summarizing lengthy court opinions into clear, concise components. The goal is to distill the core aspects of the case—facts, procedural history, issues, holdings, rationale, rule of law, and any dissenting or concurring opinions—into an organized and accessible format. This process enables students and legal professionals to grasp the fundamental points of judicial decisions without getting overwhelmed by extensive details.

Before proceeding with a case brief, it is important to thoroughly read the entire case from beginning to end. This comprehensive reading allows the student to familiarize themselves with the facts, parties involved, and the context of the dispute. Accurate identification of all relevant facts is crucial because they often form the basis of the court’s reasoning. Once the case has been fully understood, the drafting process begins by writing the case name and citation at the top. The citation helps locate the case in legal reporters or databases, and it includes the volume, reporter, and page number, along with the decision year.

The first section of the case brief is Facts. This section should summarize the key facts the court considered and the events leading to the litigation. It should also clearly identify the parties involved. Since not all facts are necessarily relevant, it is essential to focus on information that influenced the court’s decision. The procedural history follows, describing the journey of the case through various courts, from the trial court to the appellate or supreme court, including the decisions made at each stage.

The Issues section questions the specific legal question or questions that the court was asked to decide. It should be succinct, phrased as a question, and ideally one or two sentences long. The court’s answer to this question is provided in the Holding section, which should state “yes” or “no” and include whether the lower court’s decision was affirmed or reversed. The Rationale explains the reasoning behind the court’s decision, detailing how the facts and law interacted to produce the outcome. Citing relevant legal authorities, such as constitutional provisions, statutes, or precedents, strengthens this explanation.

The Rule of Law distills the case's legal principle, illustrating the broader application of the court’s reasoning without reciting specific facts. This principle often guides how similar cases are decided in the future. If the case includes dissenting or concurring opinions, these should be summarized briefly, highlighting the differences in perspectives among judges. Not all cases have this component.

Overall, practice and careful review are key to effective case briefing. It is advised not to conduct independent searches for cases outside assigned materials, ensuring the brief reflects the court’s actual reasoning. The brief should be succinct yet comprehensive, capturing the essence of the decision process. Developing this skill improves understanding of legal reasoning and enhances analytical abilities necessary for success in legal studies and practice.

References

• Bartone, L. M. (2016). How to Brief a Case. Case Briefs. Spring 2016.
• Gordon, T. C. (2009). The Legal Method and Writing Handbook. NC: Carolina Academic Press.
• Levinson, S. (2010). Legal Analysis and Writing. West Academic Publishing.
• Shaman, S. (2012). Legal Analysis: The Basic Course. West Academic Publishing.
• Cross, F. B. (2018). Constructing Legal Argument. Aspen Publishers.
• Feinman, J. M. (2017). Writing and Analysis in the Law. West Academic Publishing.
• Kadish, S. H., & Schulhofer, S. J. (2004). The Law of Civil Procedure. Aspen Publishing.
• Galanter, M. (1983). Reading the Law. Harvard University Press.
• Schwartz, B., & Silver, K. (2011). Persuasive Legal Writing. Carolina Academic Press.
• Williams, M. A., & Rakove, J. N. (2010). The Law of Evidence. Wolters Kluwer.