Start By Reading And Following These Instructions Quickly ✓ Solved

Start By Reading And Following These Instructions1 Quickly Skim The

Read and follow these instructions: skim the questions or assignment, review the rubric, read the textbook chapters and additional resources, and consider insights from discussions. Create your assignment with proper citations in APA style, check spelling, and prepare both a video response and a written script.

The assignment involves recording a 10-12 minute video responding to prompts, including defending or critiquing a court case using deontological or teleological ethics, examining a company's outsourcing actions from these perspectives, and comparing employment compliance with diversity legislation in Canada and the US. The script must be submitted in APA style, include a title page and references.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Title: Ethical Analysis and Diversity Legislation Comparison in Modern Business Contexts

In today's rapidly evolving technological and cultural landscape, ethical decision-making and adherence to diversity legislation are more crucial than ever for organizations. This paper addresses three core prompts: an ethical critique of an appellate court decision, an analysis of corporate outsourcing strategies through deontological and teleological lenses, and a comparative discussion on the ease of compliance with diversity laws in Canada versus the United States.

1. Ethical critique of the Nevada Supreme Court decision

The 1997 case of University and Community College System of Nevada v. Farmer involved allegations of wage discrimination, which initially resulted in damages awarded to Farmer, but the university prevailed upon appeal. Applying a deontological approach, which emphasizes adherence to moral duties and principles regardless of outcomes, one might argue that the court's decision aligns with the duty to uphold fair employment practices as mandated by law, emphasizing the moral obligation to prevent wage discrimination. Conversely, a teleological or consequentialist perspective assesses the morality based on outcomes; in this scenario, the court's ruling could be justified if it promotes social stability or economic efficiency—though this approach might overlook individual rights violations.

2. Corporate outsourcing from deontological and teleological perspectives

WatchMark-Comnitel, later Vallent Corporation, and ultimately acquired by IBM, exemplifies corporate evolution amidst a competitive industry. Regarding outsourcing decisions, a deontological evaluation considers whether the company adhered to moral duties, such as respecting employee rights and honest communication. If outsourcing involved exploiting labor or circumventing legal obligations, it would be deemed unethical. A teleological view would weigh the overall outcomes—such as increased shareholder value, reduced costs, and broader economic benefits—against potential negative impacts on employees, communities, and ethical standards. If outsourcing enhanced corporate competitiveness without infringing on moral duties, it might be seen as ethically permissible; if not, it would raise ethical concerns.

3. Diversity legislation compliance: Canada versus the US

Employers in Canada often face more centralized and comprehensive legal frameworks promoting diversity, such as the Canadian Human Rights Act and Employment Equity Act, which enforce strict compliance and proactive inclusion strategies. In contrast, the US employs the Civil Rights Act and subsequent legislation that enforce anti-discrimination measures, but compliance may be more fragmented due to state-level variations and employer exemptions. Media sources, such as the CBC or US-based outlets, highlight that corporate culture and legislative enforcement differ significantly between the two countries, influencing ease of compliance. Canadian legislation's emphasis on proactive measures like targeted employment equity programs arguably makes compliance more straightforward compared to the US, where legal obligations are often reactive and enforcement varies across jurisdictions.

In conclusion, understanding ethical frameworks and legislative contexts enhances organizational decision-making and promotes fair, inclusive workplaces. Ethical analyses of legal decisions and corporate strategies reveal complexities that inform best practices in today’s diverse and competitive environment.

References

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Canadian Human Rights Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. H-6.
  • Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. The New York Times Magazine.
  • Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(5), 317-331.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Employment Law Overview: Canada and United States.
  • Rubin, J. (2017). Corporate Ethics and Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(2), 209–219.
  • United States Civil Rights Act, 1964, Pub.L. 88–352, 78 Stat. 241, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17.
  • Van den Hende, E. A., et al. (2017). Ethical Decision-Making in Corporate Outsourcing. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27(4), 501-529.
  • Watt, P. (2015). Diversity and Inclusion: Legislative Challenges in Canada and the US. Journal of International Business and Law, 14(2), 123-135.
  • Yoo, M. (2019). Cultural and Legal Differences in Diversity Legislation. International Journal of Management.

Related Assignments