State Coverage Insurance Company Inspection Guide

state Coverage Insurance Company Inspect Their Cla

State Coverage Insurance Company inspects their claim forms periodically for errors. Their goal is to have zero errors on any of their claim forms. If one or more errors are found within a form, it is considered nonconforming. The company would like to use statistical process control to determine if there is a lot of variation present in the process used to complete the forms. Over the course of the last 25 working days, 125 forms were inspected each day, and the number of forms with errors (nonconforming forms) were recorded. The data includes the number of nonconforming forms found each day, along with zone information for pattern testing.

Paper For Above instruction

In analyzing the quality control process of the State Coverage Insurance Company, it is essential to determine whether the process remains in control or exhibits signs of variation that could lead to defects. The inspection data, recorded over 25 days with 125 forms examined daily, provides a foundation for applying Statistical Process Control (SPC) tools such as control charts. This analysis primarily involves creating a control chart suited for the nature of the data, calculating control limits, and interpreting the pattern and stability of the process.

a. Choice of Control Chart: Based on the data — counts of nonconforming forms per day — the appropriate control chart is a p-chart (proportion defective chart). Since the total number of forms inspected daily remains constant at 125, and we are monitoring the proportion of nonconforming forms, a p-chart effectively tracks the process stability over time. A c-chart is not suitable because it is used for counts of defects when the inspection unit size remains constant, but here, the focus is on the proportion of defective units. Additionally, x̄ and R charts are less applicable since the data are counts or proportions specific to the inspection units rather than continuous measurement or subgroup ranges.

b. Central Line (Process Center): The central line (CL) on a p-chart is the average proportion of nonconforming forms, calculated by dividing the total number of nonconforming forms by the total inspected forms over all days. If the total nonconforming forms across 25 days are aggregated, this provides the estimate of the process in-control level.

c. 3-Sigma Control Limits: The upper and lower control limits (UCL and LCL) are computed based on the binomial distribution of the proportion defective. The formulas are:

• UCL = p̄ + 3√[p̄(1 - p̄)/n]
• LCL = p̄ - 3√[p̄(1 - p̄)/n]

where p̄ is the average proportion defective, and n is the sample size per day (125 forms).

d. Control Chart Construction: Using the calculated limits and the daily data, a p-chart can be plotted. Zone lines (for pattern detection) are typically drawn at ±2σ and ±3σ from the center line, creating zones for identifying trends, shifts, or cycles. The chart can be constructed in Excel, displaying control limits and zones clearly, with annotations for patterns such as runs or trends.

e. Process Stability and Pattern Test Violations: After plotting the control chart, assess whether all points lie within the control limits and check for non-random patterns such as consecutive points trending upward or downward, runs of points on one side of the center line, or cyclical patterns. Violations indicate the process is out of control, requiring investigation and corrective action. Specific pattern tests include the occurrence of 7 consecutive points on either side of the center line or 8 points trending in one direction.

Zone Information Table

Note: Exact zone borders would be calculated based on the control limits and standard deviations, essential for identifying pattern violations.

Summary of Findings

After plotting the p-chart with calculated control limits and zones, the process should be evaluated for stability. If all points fall within the control limits and no patterns violate rules, the process is considered in control. Otherwise, signals such as runs or trends should prompt investigation into sources of variation. Overall, this SPC analysis provides valuable insights into process performance and potential areas for quality improvement in claim form processing.

References

1. Montgomery, D. C. (2019). Introduction to Statistical Quality Control (8th ed.). Wiley.
2. Chatfield, C. (2003). The Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction (6th ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC.
3. Grant, E. L., & Leavenworth, R. S. (1996). Statistical Quality Control (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
4. Ryan, T. P. (2011). Statistical Methods for Quality Improvement. Wiley.
5. Pyzdek, T., & Keller, P. (2014). The Six Sigma Handbook: A Complete Guide for Green Belts, Black Belts, and Managers at All Levels. McGraw-Hill Education.
6. Keller, P. A. (2010). Performance Measurement and Control Systems for Implementing Strategy. Pearson Education.
7. Nair, N. (2004). Quality Control and Improvement. Routledge.
8. Dalton, O. T., & Sweeney, D. J. (1998). Statistical Process Control. Harvard Business School Press.
9. Shewhart, W. A. (1931). Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product. Van Nostrand Company.
10. Goetsch, D. L., & Davis, S. B. (2019). Quality Management for Organizational Excellence (10th ed.). Pearson.