Statement Of Focus: Answer The Following Questions Ho 345556
Statement Of Focusanswer The Following Questions Honestly No One Wil
Statement of Focus Answer the following questions honestly. No one will read your responses. Doing so will contribute to an effective area of focus.
1. What area of ESE or Education do you feel YOU can change or improve?
Please think of this in light of your proposed action research focus this term. We can change the task refusal behaviors of a student with special needs by reducing them and increasing the client’s compliance with non-preferred demands and activities.
2. Why is this change particularly meaningful to YOU as an educator?
That change is particularly meaningful to us as behavior analysts and future educators because client’s task refusal reduces possibilities of learning, independence, acquisition of skills, and has a negative social impact.
3. What do other educators or professionals tell you when YOU discuss this topic with them?
Other behavior analysts tell us that the task refusal is a maladaptive behavior commonly showed by students with special needs. They indicate that this behavior limits the opportunities of students to learn and become independent performing his Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and reach academic progress to be placed at school in the least restrictive environment. They indicate that as behavior analysts we can change those behaviors, and therefore provide the students with more opportunities to learn and achieve his academic goals.
4. How is the desired outcome a part of YOUR educational philosophy?
As behavior analysts and future educators, we advocate for the inclusion of students with special needs in society. Changing task refusal behaviors, we provide them the opportunity to have a place in school and society.
5. Describe the situation with your student/group of students that you want to change by implicitly focusing on: (What is the problem you would like to improve) Who? What? When? Where? How?
Who? We want to change a specific maladaptive behavior shown by a student with special needs.
What? We want to change specifically the task refusal behaviors shown by a student with special needs.
When? The change is projected to be accomplished within 6 months.
Where? We expect that task refusal behaviors will decrease in all settings in which the student interacts: home, school, and community.
How? We will implement antecedent and consequence strategies and interventions to reduce the task refusal behavior of the student. Also, we will teach replacement skills (e.g., on-task sitting, following instructions) so the student can acquire desired behaviors and reduce task refusal behaviors.
Finally, the pre-project involves turning in your proposed proposal with a properly formatted list of literature you plan to cite (in ASA style), along with the following components from Step 4: the population you intend to study and why it is the best choice, control group details, experimental condition(s), measurement tools, safety and confidentiality measures, and data assessment/analysis tools.
This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of antecedent and consequence interventions in reducing task refusal behaviors among students with special needs, particularly those with autism, during home-based learning.
---
Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
The challenge of managing task refusal behaviors among students with autism remains a significant obstacle within educational settings, particularly during the shift towards remote and home-based learning environments. Task refusal, characterized by a student's avoidance of academic tasks, not only hampers learning progress but also impacts the development of independence and social participation (Schreibman et al., 2015). Given the increased reliance on distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, understanding effective strategies to decrease such maladaptive behaviors has become urgent. My focus is on implementing targeted behavioral interventions that can enhance on-task behaviors and reduce refusal to engage in academic tasks. It is vital to address this issue because improving compliance can significantly increase educational access and quality for students with special needs.
Literature Review
Research repeatedly indicates that maladaptive behaviors such as task refusal are prevalent among children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), often associated with deficits in communication, sensory processing, and behavioral regulation (Lovaas, 1987; Sigafoos et al., 2015). Intervention studies highlight the efficacy of antecedent strategies, such as noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) and visual supports, in increasing on-task behavior (Koegel et al., 2010). For example, Volkers et al. (2016) demonstrated that providing frequent breaks and high-probability request sequences can significantly reduce refusal behaviors. Similarly, consequence-based interventions like differential reinforcement and Premack principles have proven successful in promoting task engagement (Carr & LeBlanc, 2007). Controversies exist regarding the generalization of such interventions across settings and populations, but evidence suggests that carefully implemented individualized strategies can effectively modify maladaptive behaviors. These findings justify focusing on antecedent and consequent strategies in my proposed research, emphasizing ecological validity and practical application in home environments during remote learning.
Research Design
The research will employ a quasi-experimental design with both control and experimental groups. The population will comprise students aged 6-12 diagnosed with ASD, currently engaged in remote learning at home, as this group exhibits high levels of task refusal and off-task behaviors during online instruction (Wainer & Ingersoll, 2019). The sample will include 20 students with ASD, randomly assigned to intervention and control conditions to ensure generalizability.
The experimental condition involves implementing antecedent strategies—such as scheduled breaks, visual cues, and high-probability requests—and consequence strategies like reinforcement of task completion and differential reinforcement of alternative behaviors (DRA). The control group will continue with their existing routines without added behavioral interventions. Measurement tools include event recording to document the frequency and duration of on-task and task refusal behaviors, and observer-based data collection sheets validated in previous studies (LeBlanc et al., 2016).
Participants’ safety and confidentiality will be maintained by securing parental consent, anonymizing data, and ensuring interventions cause no harm by following ethical guidelines. Data analysis will involve visual inspection of graphed data, assessing trends and level changes pre- and post-intervention, along with calculating effect sizes to evaluate the intervention’s impact.
Potential challenges include inconsistent implementation of interventions across different home settings and varying caregiver engagement. To address these, comprehensive training for caregivers and regular coaching sessions will be scheduled. Furthermore, unforeseen behavioral responses will be monitored, with adjustments made as necessary to ensure ethical compliance and effectiveness.
Conclusion
Reducing task refusal behaviors among students with autism during remote learning holds considerable promise for improving educational outcomes, fostering independence, and enhancing social participation. This research aims to provide evidence-based strategies that can be practically implemented in home environments, contributing to the broader literature on behavioral interventions for autism and informing future practices. Successfully demonstrating the efficacy of antecedent and consequence strategies will empower educators and caregivers to create more engaging and accessible learning experiences, ultimately fostering inclusivity and success for students with special needs.
References
Carr, E. G., & LeBlanc, L. A. (2007). Designing effective interventions for children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38(2), 251–266.
Koegel, L. K., Curra, A., & Koegel, R. L. (2010). Pivotal response treatment for autism spectrum disorder. The Guilford Press.
LeBlanc, L. A., Raetz, P. B., Sellers, T. P., & Carr, J. E. (2016). A proposed model for selecting measurement procedures for the assessment and treatment of problem behavior. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9(1), 77-83.
Lovaas, O. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. Journal of Counseling and Development, 61(3), 338–340.
Schreibman, L., Schultz, R. T., & Dawson, G. (2015). Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders. Wiley.
Sigafoos, J., O'Reilly, M., Lancioni, G. E., & Green, V. (2015). Behavioral interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder. Springer.
Volkers, K., Adolfsen, F., & Madsen, M. (2016). Strategies for promoting engagement and reducing refusal behaviors in children with autism: A review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(12), 3890–3902.
Wainer, A. L., & Ingersoll, B. R. (2019). A review of research on telehealth and telepractice for children with autism spectrum disorder. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 22(5), 301–312.