Statistics For Decision Making Week 6 I Lab Name And Data An

Statistics For Decision Making Week 6 I lab Name and Data Analysis

The assignment involves conducting various statistical analyses using Excel based on provided survey data. The tasks include calculating confidence intervals for sleep hours, comparing these intervals at different confidence levels, analyzing the DRIVE variable's distribution, creating visual representations of categorical data, and performing descriptive statistics segmented by gender. The ultimate goal is to interpret the statistical results in context, compare predicted and actual data, and analyze the shape and distribution properties of the variables involved.

Paper For Above instruction

The analysis of survey data to derive meaningful statistical insights can provide valuable information about the characteristics and behaviors of a student population. In this context, the focus is on sleep patterns, driving distances, and other demographic variables. By applying inferential statistics and data visualization techniques, we aim to understand the central tendencies, variability, and distributional properties among different variables, as well as how these vary across subgroups such as gender.

The first task involves calculating a 95% confidence interval for the average hours of sleep among students. Using Excel functions, the mean sleep hours are computed by applying the AVERAGE function to the relevant data range. The standard deviation is obtained by the STDEV function. With these, the margin of error is calculated using the CONFIDENCE.NORM function at a 95% confidence level, incorporating the standard deviation and sample size. The resulting confidence interval, expressed as (x – E, x + E), provides a range in which the true mean of sleep hours is likely to fall with 95% confidence. Interpreting this, we should state the interval explicitly and explain that we are 95% confident that the actual average sleep hours for the population lies within this range.

Similarly, for a higher confidence level of 99%, the same process is followed by adjusting the confidence parameter in the CONFIDENCE.NORM function. The wider interval associated with the 99% confidence level reflects increased uncertainty, capturing a broader range, and illustrating the inherent trade-off between confidence level and interval width. The comparison reveals that the 99% interval is necessarily larger because higher confidence requires a broader estimate to ensure the true mean is included.

The comparison of the two intervals underscores the key principle of confidence intervals: as the confidence level increases (from 95% to 99%), the interval widens to account for increased certainty, thus reducing the risk of excluding the true population parameter. This phenomenon is rooted in the properties of the normal distribution and the nature of sampling variability.

Next, the analysis turns to the DRIVE variable, where the mean and standard deviation are computed similarly with Excel functions. Assuming a normal distribution, the probability that a student's drive distance is less than 40 miles is predicted using the NORM.DIST function, which calculates the cumulative probability up to 40 miles based on the sample mean and standard deviation. To validate this prediction, the dataset is sorted, and the number of observations with drive distances less than 40 miles is counted, revealing the actual percentage. Comparing the predicted and actual percentages provides insight into the normality assumption and the representative accuracy of the predictive model.

Further, the analysis explores the percentage of students with drive distances between 40 and 70 miles, as well as those exceeding 70 miles. By computing the cumulative probabilities at these points and subtracting, the percent predicted to fall within this range is obtained, and similarly, the actual dataset is examined by counting data points within this interval. The comparison highlights potential deviations from normality, data skewness, and possible outliers, informing understanding of travel distance behaviors among students.

To deepen the analysis, the variables of height and money are examined. The mean and standard deviation for height are calculated overall, and the comparison between males and females reveals differences in average height and variability. The shape of the height distribution, as observed from a histogram, tends to be roughly symmetrical, suggesting a normal-like distribution. The stem-and-leaf plot for the money variable indicates a distribution skewed to the left, with the highest frequency in the lowest dollar amounts, which can suggest a few students having significantly more money.

In the assessment of the data's distributional properties, graphical tools such as histograms, bar charts, and pie charts are employed. The bar chart illustrating the frequency of students’ states of origin shows which states are most represented, with the highest counts in specific states. The pie chart depicting car colors reveals the most common car color among students, providing insights into preferences or regional trends. The histogram of height categories visualizes the spread and center, showing a near-symmetrical shape, consistent with the numerical summary.

Further, descriptive statistics segmented by gender indicate that males tend to be taller on average than females, with a difference of approximately four inches. The variability in heights, represented by standard deviations, is slightly greater among males, indicating more variation in male heights compared to females. These findings align with general biological trends and support the hypothesis that gender influences height.

Overall, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of this data demonstrate the application of foundational statistical principles, including confidence intervals, probability calculations, and descriptive statistics, to real-world data. Recognizing the distributional characteristics and differences across subgroups enhances understanding of the tested variables and informs future research or decision-making.

References

• Everitt, B. (2014). The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics. Cambridge University Press.
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. SAGE Publications.
• Krishnaiah, P. R., & Chang, C. F. (1988). some properties of confidence intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(402), 372-379.
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.
• Moore, D. S., McCabe, G. P., & Craig, B. A. (2012). Introduction to the Practice of Statistics. W. H. Freeman.
• Myers, R. H., & Well, A. D. (2015). Research Design and Statistical Analysis. Routledge.
• Ott, R. L., & Longnecker, M. (2015). An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis. Brooks Cole.
• Wasserman, L. (2004). All of Statistics: A Concise Course in Statistical Inference. Springer.
• Zar, J. H. (2010). Biostatistical Analysis. Pearson Education.
• Zellner, A. (1997). Basic issues in statistical inference. In Bayesian Analysis in Economics and Education (pp. 1-19). Springer.