Step 4: Write Your Final Essay And Combine It With Revision
Step 4 Write Your Final Essay And Combine It With Revised Assignments
Write a final essay of approximately 750 words explaining why you chose the three essays you did and the changes you focused on. Your final essay should be written in a standard essay form, follow all required guidelines, and be numbered pages. When submitting, combine the final essay first, followed by the three revised essays, to illustrate your process and decisions in preparing your portfolio. This project demonstrates your work and thought process, providing insight into your metacognitive reflection. Consult the Course Calendar for the due date.
Paper For Above instruction
The process of creating a comprehensive portfolio of one’s writing involves careful reflection on the choices made during the revision process and an understanding of the evolution of the original essays. The final step in this process, as outlined in the instructions, is to compose a final analytical essay of approximately 750 words. This essay serves as a meta-commentary on the writing journey embarked upon throughout the term, emphasizing the rationale behind selecting specific essays and highlighting the significant changes implemented in each.
Choice of Essays
The initial segment of the final essay should detail why particular essays were selected from among the drafts and revisions completed over the course. Contributing factors can include the essays’ relevance to the course themes, the challenges encountered during revision, or the progress demonstrated through revisions. For example, a student might choose an essay that initially lacked clarity or organization but showed significant improvement after revisions. Alternatively, advantages such as the essay’s alignment with personal interests or its demonstration of learned skills might influence the selection. Explicitly articulating the reasons for each choice provides insight into the student’s evaluative process and areas of growth.
Focus of Revisions
The core of the final essay should discuss the specific modifications made to each of the three essays. These could involve improvements in thesis clarity, argument development, evidence organization, transitions, style, tone, or grammar. For example, a student might describe how they worked on enhancing the coherence of ideas across paragraphs or strengthened their thesis statement for greater impact. Detailing these changes demonstrates a reflective understanding of the revision process and engages critical self-assessment. Particular attention should be paid to the most challenging aspects of revision and the strategies used to overcome obstacles.
Metacognitive Reflection and Process
Crucially, the final essay should incorporate a metacognitive perspective—an explanation of the thinking process behind each revision. This could include reflections on what the student learned about their writing, how their understanding of the subject deepened through revision, and how feedback influenced their work. For instance, a student might discuss how receiving peer or instructor feedback prompted targeted revisions to improve clarity or argument strength. This reflection not only illustrates growth as a writer but also shows capacity for critical self-evaluation, essential for lifelong learning.
Presentation and Format
The final submission must adhere to standard essay conventions, including proper paragraph structure, clear thesis statements, transitions, and spelling/grammar accuracy. Pages should be numbered, and the overall presentation should be neat and professional. The submitted portfolio should begin with this reflective final essay, immediately followed by the three revised essays to allow the instructor or mentor to understand the development process and the revisions made.
Timing and Submission
As emphasized, the due date is specified in the Course Calendar. Planning ahead and allowing sufficient time for thoughtful reflection, revision, and editing ensures a polished final product. This portfolio is an opportunity to showcase the student’s best work while providing critical insight into their writing evolution and metacognitive awareness.
References
- Anson, C. M. (2012). Writing and Revising: A Naval Approach. Routledge.
- Bean, J. C. (2011). Engaging Ideas: The Professor's Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom. Jossey-Bass.
- Harris, M. (2014). Rewriting: How to Do Things with Texts. Bedford/St. Martin’s.
- Lunsford, A. A., & Ingwersen, C. (2014). The Everyday Writer. Bedford/St. Martin’s.
- Strunk, W., & White, E. B. (2000). The Elements of Style. Pearson.
- Silva, T. (2010). How to Write a Lot: A Practical Guide to Productive Academic Writing. American Psychological Association.
- Wysocki, A. F., & Johnson, K. (2014). Writing New Media. Routledge.
- Berlin, J. (1987). Rhetoric and Reality: Deception in the Construction of the American West. University of Wisconsin Press.
- Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2014). They Say / I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing. W. W. Norton & Company.
- Johnson, M. (2009). Giving Students a Voice in the Classroom: How Writers and Teachers Can Support Collaborative Learning. Harvard Educational Review.