Step 7: Critical Resources Now That You've Examined The Orga

Step 7 Critical Resourcesnow That Youve Examined The Organizational

Step 7 Critical Resourcesnow That Youve Examined The Organizational

Now that you’ve examined the organizational big picture—MVGOs, size, and structure—you’re going to analyze the critical resources of your organization. Consider whether your organization has the critical resources needed to accomplish its MVGOs, whether these are being used effectively, and whether they are being leveraged for competitive advantage. Read about these two theories to learn more about how and why certain resources may serve as a source of strength for an organization: Resource-Based Theory and Resource Dependency Theory. Additionally, you should consider whether your organization has valuable, rare, inimitable, and non-substitutable (VRIN) resources that it can use for competitive advantage and whether these are sufficient given the market or markets in which your organization operates.

Types of critical resources

For each of the items below, prepare a simple-to-understand “high-level” description of the organization’s situation that will be helpful for people new to the organization. Depending on your personal and professional interests and the characteristics of your organization, you may choose to limit the scope of your overview and analysis of these resources. Be sure to consult with your faculty when/if you have questions about how to handle this part of the project.

  • Human resources
  • Financial resources
  • Technology resources
  • Buildings and equipment (physical resources)
  • Other types of resources you consider important (for example, information)

Briefly describe all resources, analyze their alignment with and support for MVGOs, and identify issues that may merit further attention. When Step 7 is complete, submit your findings and analysis for review and feedback.

Paper For Above instruction

The examination of an organization's critical resources is fundamental in understanding its capacity to achieve its Mission, Vision, Goals, and Objectives (MVGOs). This analysis encompasses a variety of tangible and intangible assets that serve as the backbone of strategic advantage. By applying established theories such as the Resource-Based View (RBV) and Resource Dependency Theory (RDT), organizations can assess which resources serve as valuable sources of competitive strength and how they can be effectively leveraged.

In assessing human resources, organizations should consider the skills, expertise, and overall talent pool available. Human resources form the core of organizational innovation and operational efficiency. For instance, a tech company's software developers and data analysts constitute critical human capital that directly supports MVGOs related to product development and innovation. Ensuring these personnel possess unique skills that are rare and difficult to imitate—elements of the VRIN framework—enhances strategic advantage. Moreover, fostering a motivated and committed workforce can provide inimitable capabilities that sustain long-term success.

Financial resources are equally essential, providing the fiscal capacity to fund projects, expand operations, and invest in new technologies or markets. Adequate liquidity and access to capital, whether through internal savings or external funding, facilitate the pursuit of strategic objectives. For example, a healthcare organization seeking to expand its services must evaluate whether its financial reserves are sufficient to support new facilities or acquisition investments without jeopardizing existing operations. Under resource dependency theory, financial stability may also influence external relationships and negotiations, affecting the organization’s ability to secure strategic alliances.

Technology resources are increasingly critical in today’s digital economy. These include proprietary software, hardware infrastructure, data management systems, and innovative tools that enhance efficiency or provide differentiation in the marketplace. A manufacturing firm, for instance, utilizing robotics and AI-driven quality control systems attains higher productivity levels and reduces costs, thereby supporting MVGOs related to operational excellence. The VRIN criteria help organizations identify technologies that are unique and inimitable—offering sustainable competitive advantages—especially when protected by patents or trade secrets.

Physical resources such as buildings, facilities, machinery, and equipment are tangible assets that directly influence operational capacity. Their condition, location, and technological integration determine how well they support the organization’s strategic objectives. For example, a retail chain’s strategically located stores with modern design and infrastructure can attract more customers, positively impacting sales and brand reputation. Regular maintenance and upgrades are crucial to sustain these physical assets' contribution to MVGOs.

Other important resources may include informational assets like customer databases, brand reputation, patents, proprietary processes, or supplier networks. Information resources, in particular, can provide strategic insights and support decision-making that aligns with organizational goals. Managing these assets effectively can yield competitive advantages, especially when they are rare or protected by legal rights. For example, a pharmaceutical company’s patent portfolio can serve as a significant barrier to entry for competitors.

When analyzing these resources, organizations should evaluate their alignment with MVGOs, ensuring that resource capabilities are appropriate and adequately exploited. Potential issues to consider include resource obsolescence, underutilization, or gaps where strategic resources are lacking. Addressing such issues often involves targeted investments, reorganization, or strategic partnerships to bolster resource strengths and mitigate weaknesses.

In conclusion, a thorough review of critical organizational resources offers strategic insights necessary for competitive positioning. Using theoretical frameworks like RBV and RDT enables organizations to distinguish resources that serve as enduring sources of competitive advantage, ensuring that strategic efforts are prioritized effectively. Continuous evaluation and strategic management of these resources enhance the likelihood of achieving MVGOs and sustaining long-term success in dynamic market environments.

References

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
  • Barney, J. B. (2001). Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 41-56.
  • Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.
  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
  • Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2008). Exploring Corporate Strategy. Pearson Education.
  • Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191.
  • Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2017). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases. Cengage Learning.
  • Barney, J., & Arikan, A. M. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27(6), 643-650.
  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.