Stoichiometry Lab – The Chemistry Behind Carbonate Reactions

Stoichiometry Lab – The Chemistry Behind Carbonates reacting with Vinegar

The assignment involves analyzing both qualitative and quantitative reactions between carbonates (such as eggshell calcium carbonate and baking soda sodium bicarbonate) and vinegar (acetic acid). The core objectives include observing limiting reactants, measuring mass changes due to gas loss, calculating CO₂ production, and understanding the underlying chemistry through balanced equations and stoichiometry.

The procedure encompasses two parts: first, a qualitative analysis of eggshell calcium carbonate reacting with vinegar, noting visual and physical changes; second, a quantitative analysis involving measuring reactants, observing mass loss, and calculating theoretical versus actual CO₂ yields, including determining limiting reactants and percent yield. Additional extension tasks involve similar calculations with calcium carbonate from eggshells instead of baking soda and analyzing gas evolution, limiting reactants, and reaction efficiency.

Paper For Above instruction

The chemical reactions between carbonates and vinegar offer a fascinating window into acid-base chemistry and stoichiometric principles. The primary focus of this lab is to observe how calcium carbonate in eggshells and sodium bicarbonate (baking soda) react with acetic acid in vinegar, producing carbon dioxide gas as indicated by bubbling and foaming. Understanding this reaction is fundamental to grasping concepts such as limiting reactants, mass conservation, and yield calculations in chemical processes.

Beginning with the qualitative part, students observe the reaction between vinegar and calcium carbonate in eggshells. In this experiment, two cups containing eggs are soaked in different vinegar solutions: one with diluted vinegar (5 mL vinegar + 395 mL water) and the other with concentrated vinegar (400 mL). Over 24 hours, bubbling and physical changes such as the eggshells becoming softer, rubbery, and more flexible demonstrate the release of carbon dioxide gas. The reaction can be summarized in words as follows: calcium carbonate reacts with acetic acid to produce soluble calcium acetate, water, and carbon dioxide. The reaction formula is: CaCO₃ (s) + 2 CH₃COOH (aq) → Ca(CH₃COO)₂ (aq) + H₂O (l) + CO₂ (g). The CO₂ gas forms bubbles, causing observable foaming and foam formation, confirming the reaction's occurrence.

Aditionally, measurements such as visual observations and noting the degree of shell erosion highlight the reaction's effects. When stirring the mixture, the production of gas causes bubbling, which was more prominent in the cup with a higher concentration of vinegar, indicating a more vigorous reaction due to greater availability of acetic acid. These qualitative observations demonstrate that the vinegar's acid strength influences the reaction rate and extent, aligning with theoretical expectations.

Moving to the quantitative analysis, students measure the initial masses of reactants, including baking soda and vinegar, then monitor the change in mass after reaction. The mass of baking soda (around 5 grams) and the measured volume of vinegar (44 mL) are used to determine the moles of reactants involving molar masses. For instance, sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO₃) has a molar mass of approximately 84.0 g/mol, so the moles used in the experiment are calculated by dividing the measured mass by this value. The vinegar's acetic acid content is obtained by multiplying the volume (44 mL) by its concentration percentage (e.g., 5%), then converting to mass (considering density and percent concentration). The molar mass of acetic acid (HC₂H₃O₂) is approximately 60.05 g/mol.

The core stoichiometric calculation involves determining the moles of reactants to identify the limiting reactant—either sodium bicarbonate or acetic acid—based on the mole ratio from the balanced equation, which is 1:1 for sodium bicarbonate and acetic acid. The theoretical yield of CO₂ is calculated using the limiting reactant's moles multiplied by the molar mass of CO₂ (44.01 g/mol). It is essential to compare this value with the actual CO₂ produced, inferred from the mass loss in the reaction, to determine the percent yield.

In performing these calculations, possible sources of error such as incomplete reactions, gas escape, or measurement inaccuracies are considered. The discrepancy between theoretical and actual yields often results from experimental limitations like gas leakage, impure reactants, or inconsistent measurements. For example, if less gas is produced than predicted, it might be due to imperfect sealing or reaction side processes.

The extension discusses reacting calcium carbonate from eggshells with vinegar, noting that the reaction is 2:1 (calcium carbonate to acetic acid): CaCO₃ (s) + 2 CH₃COOH (aq) → Ca(CH₃COO)₂ (aq) + H₂O (l) + CO₂ (g). Sample calculations involve similar steps—determining moles of calcium carbonate, M of acetic acid, limiting reactant, and the expected CO₂ yield. If data on calcium carbonate mass is provided, the limiting reagent can be identified, and theoretical CO₂ production assessed.

In conclusion, this lab underscores the importance of balancing chemical equations, calculating molar quantities, and understanding the concept of limiting reactants to predict yields accurately. Recognizing practical constraints, such as gas escape and measurement errors, is crucial for interpreting experimental results. Such experiments are fundamental for developing analytical skills and a deeper understanding of chemical reactions involving acids and carbonates.

References

• Zumdahl, S. S., & Zumdahl, S. A. (2014). Chemistry: An Atoms First Approach. Cengage Learning.
• Brown, T. L., LeMay, H. E., Bursten, B. E., & Murphy, C. J. (2018). Chemistry: The Central Science. Pearson.
• Petrucci, R. H., Herring, F. G., Madura, J. D., & Bissonnette, C. (2017). General Chemistry: Principles & Modern Applications. Pearson.
• Laidler, K. J., Meiser, J. H., & Sanctuary, R. (2013). Physical Chemistry. Houghton Mifflin.
• Schwarz, J. (2010). Educational Chemistry Experiments. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(3), 274-275.
• Oxtoby, D. W., Gillis, H. P., & Butler, S. (2015). Principles of Modern Chemistry. Cengage Learning.
• Chang, R., & Goldsby, K. (2016). Chemistry. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Naylor, S. (2013). The Chemistry of Carbonates and Acid Reactions. Scientific American, 308(5), 60-65.
• Klein, H. A. (2012). Laboratory Experiments for General Chemistry. Department of Chemistry Publications.
• Sheffield, J., & Shelley, F. (2014). Stoichiometry and Gas Volumes in Acid-Base Reactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(2), 218-222.