Student: The Main Intention Of This Framework Is To Support

Student 1the Main Intention Of This Framework Is To Support Large Cor

The main intention of this framework is to support large corporate organizations with their portfolio management and risk management processes. The framework is capable of handling both insurance and non-insurance risks. It is recommended to use this framework within recognized enterprise risk management (ERM) practices. James Lam outlined four benefits of risk management: it is management's responsibility to handle risks; managing risks reduces earnings volatility; effective risk management can maximize shareholders' value; and risk management promotes financial and job security (Zhou & Xu, 2018).

Handling risk is a management duty that involves utilizing critical business information to manage potential threats. This transparency in cost management and risk understanding can lead to better decision-making. Managing risk can reduce earnings instability, enabling companies to stabilize profits through proactive activities. By managing risks effectively, companies can increase shareholder value and identify opportunities for business optimization through risk-based strategies that extend performance and reduce volatility (Liang et al., 2017).

The framework advocates for the direct communication of the efficient frontier to business leaders, empowering them to assume risk ownership within their spheres of influence. Fundamental to this process is modeling the language of risk accurately, particularly in modeling risk transfer and insurance lines. The framework assumes that such modeling is precise; however, practical issues like modeling flaws, internal disputes, data limitations, and information asymmetries can hinder its effectiveness. Therefore, rigorously testing and back-testing models and involving independent experts to scrutinize assumptions are critical steps (Tajani & Morano, 2017).

Paper For Above instruction

Large corporate organizations face a complex landscape of risks that can threaten their strategic objectives, operational effectiveness, and financial stability. To navigate this environment, a comprehensive risk management framework rooted in enterprise risk management (ERM) principles is indispensable. The core aim of such a framework is to provide systematic processes for identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks, whether insurance-related or not, thereby safeguarding organizational value and promoting sustainable growth.

Risk management, as emphasized by James Lam, offers tangible benefits for organizations. These include the assumption of a management role in risk handling, the reduction of earnings volatility, the maximization of shareholders’ value, and the enhancement of both financial and job security (Zhou & Xu, 2018). Each benefit underscores the importance of embedding risk management into organizational strategy and decision-making processes. Effective risk management enables transparency in risk and cost control, facilitating better resource allocation and operational efficiency.

Particularly, managing risk reduces the unpredictability of earnings, which is vital for stakeholder confidence and market stability. For instance, companies that proactively address risks can smooth earnings fluctuations, thereby reassuring investors and creditors. Simultaneously, leveraging risk management allows organizations to identify new opportunities—optimizing business models and extending performance—by understanding where risks lie and how they can be exploited or mitigated.

Central to the framework is the concept of the efficient frontier, which guides decision-makers to understand the trade-offs between risk and return. Next-generation risk models facilitate the learning of a common language of risk across the organization, which enhances communication and ensures cohesive risk ownership. However, modeling assumptions, particularly relating to risk transfer and insurance lines, must be rigorously validated through testing and back-testing processes. Involving independent experts further ensures the robustness and reliability of models, reducing the risk of misjudgments that could threaten organizational stability (Tajani & Morano, 2017).

In sum, the development of a risk management framework for large organizations hinges on integrating advanced modeling, transparent communication, and continuous testing protocols. This holistic approach allows organizations to anticipate, prepare for, and respond to a wide array of risks, thereby bolstering resilience and enabling strategic agility in a volatile business environment.

References

• Zhou, W., & Xu, Z. (2018). Portfolio selection and risk investment under the hesitant fuzzy environment. Knowledge-Based Systems, 144, 21-31.
• Liang, J., Zhong, M., Zeng, G., Chen, G., Hua, S., & Li, X. (2017). Risk management for optimal land use planning integrating ecosystem services values: A case study in Changsha, Middle China. Science Of The Total Environment, 579, 275–285.
• Tajani, F., & Morano, P. (2017). Evaluation of vacant and redundant public properties and risk control. Journal Of Property Investment & Finance, 35(1), 75-100.
• Restemeyer, B., van den Brink, M., & Woltjer, J. (2018). Resilience unpacked - framing of “uncertainty” and “adaptability” in long-term flood risk management strategies for London and Rotterdam. European Planning Studies, 26(8), 1559–1579.
• Viscelli, T. R., Hermanson, D. R., & Beasley, M. S. (2017). The Integration of ERM and Strategy: Implications for Corporate Governance. Accounting Horizons, 31(2), 69–82.
• Bhavsar, T. R., Esbitt, D. L., Yu, P. A., Yu, Y., & Gorman, S. E. (2018). Planning Considerations for State, Local, Tribal, and Territorial Partners to Receive Medical Countermeasures From CDC’s Strategic National Stockpile During a Public Health Emergency. American Journal of Public Health, 108, S183–S187.
• Yang, J., Su, J., & Song, L. (2019). Selection of manufacturing enterprise innovation design project based on consumer's green preferences. Sustainability, 11(5), 1375.
• Antony, J., & Gupta, S. (2019). Top ten reasons for process improvement project failures. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma.
• JAA Inc. – A Case Study in Creating Value from Uncertainty Enterprise Risk Management, Professor Michael Solomon, 2023.