Students Are Responsible For Writing A Response Paper

Students Are Responsible For Writing A Response Paper At The End Of Ea

Students are responsible for writing a response paper at the end of each week. The paper’s topic will draw from the readings assigned for that week. The paper’s question (or set of questions) will build off the weekly discussion response. The purpose of the weekly response paper is for students to demonstrate that they have completed the assigned readings and can critically apply the material to larger questions of history and political economy. The paper should be four-to-five pages and follow the basic format of: introduction, body, conclusion, and footnotes that follow the Chicago-style format (do not cite in the body of the text).

All papers should contain the student’s own, individual voice that is supported with evidence and facts drawn from the assigned readings. Other secondary sources used to complement or strengthen your argument are acceptable, however Wikipedia entries and blog posts are not acceptable as sources. In the attachments there will be everything included there are three essays that need to be rewritten. They all need to be completed to 4-5 pages and with all the instructions I included in the description here.

Paper For Above instruction

The weekly response papers serve as a critical component of the learning process, providing students with an opportunity to engage deeply with assigned readings and articulate their understanding through well-structured analysis. This task requires synthesizing complex historical and political economic concepts into coherent, original arguments supported by textual evidence while maintaining academic integrity by avoiding unreliable sources like Wikipedia and blogs.

In this response paper, I will analyze the core themes from this week’s readings, which explore the interconnectedness of history and political economy and their impact on contemporary societal structures. The materials emphasized the importance of understanding historical contexts when evaluating economic policies and political movements. The readings highlighted how economic systems are historically contingent and shaped by social, political, and ideological forces that evolve over time.

To demonstrate mastery of the material, I will first summarize the key arguments from the assigned texts, focusing on the historical development of economic institutions and their influence on political power. For example, one reading discusses the rise of capitalism during the Industrial Revolution and its role in reshaping societal hierarchies. Another examines the relationship between state policies and economic inequality, illustrating how governmental actions can entrench or mitigate disparities. These points will serve as the foundation for my critical analysis.

Building on this foundation, I will evaluate how these historical processes continue to influence modern economic and political landscapes. I argue that understanding the origins of economic disparities rooted in historical contexts is essential for developing effective policy solutions. For instance, recognizing the legacy of colonialism and systemic inequality informs contemporary debates over reparations, social justice, and economic redistribution.

Throughout the paper, I will utilize evidence from the readings to support my claims, including quotations and specific examples illustrating key concepts. My analysis will be original, offering perspectives that integrate historical insight with current issues. The conclusion will synthesize these points, emphasizing the importance of historical literacy in understanding present-day political economy challenges.

References

• Foucault, Michel. 1977. "Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison." Vintage Books.
• Marx, Karl. 1867. "Das Kapital." Penguin Classics.
• Piketty, Thomas. 2014. "Capital in the Twenty-First Century." Harvard University Press.
• Schmidt, Vivien. 2002. "The Political Economy of Social Democracy." Routledge.
• Skocpol, Theda. 1979. "States and Social Revolutions." Cambridge University Press.
• Weber, Max. 1905. "The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism." Routledge.
• Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. "The Modern World-System." Academic Press.
• Chandhoke, Nihal. 2003. "The Political Economy of Development." SAGE Publications.
• Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. 2012. "Why Nations Fail." Crown Business.
• Harvey, David. 2005. "A Brief History of Neoliberalism." Oxford University Press.