Students Will Also Write Several Paragraph Reading Review

Students will also write a several paragraph Reading Review, answering questions pertaining to broad themes addressed throughout the semester.

Students will also write a several paragraph Reading Review, answering questions pertaining to broad themes addressed throughout the semester.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment requires writing a comprehensive Reading Review that critically engages with a selection of readings related to American history and political thought, spanning from the antebellum period through the Civil War era. The review should synthesize the main themes, arguments, and historical contexts presented in the provided materials, including works such as George Fitzhugh's proslavery argument, Samuel S. Cox's condemnation of emancipation, and the Lincoln-Douglas debates, among others. The review must explore overarching themes such as slavery, abolition, states' rights, sectional tensions, and constitutional debates, illustrating how these issues influenced the political landscape of 19th-century America.

The paper should start with an introductory paragraph that presents the scope and purpose of the review, followed by body paragraphs that analyze and compare the key texts, emphasizing their perspectives, rhetorical strategies, and historical significance. Each paragraph should focus on specific themes or debates, demonstrating a nuanced understanding of how these texts reflect the broader societal conflicts of their time.

The conclusion should synthesize the main insights gained from the review, reflecting on the impact of these ideological conflicts on the trajectory of American history leading to the Civil War. Throughout the paper, proper citations must be used to support analysis, and all references from the assigned readings should be properly acknowledged in a references section at the end of the paper.

References

  • Fitzhugh, G. (1854). Sociology for the South. ‘George F. Fitzhugh and the proslavery argument’, in American Historical Review.
  • Cox, S. S. (1862). Condemns emancipation. New York Times.
  • Lincoln, A. (1858). The Lincoln-Douglas debates. Illinois State Historical Library.
  • Declaration of Independence (1776). The Declaration PDF.
  • Additional scholarly sources analyzing sectional tensions and debates.
  • Contemporary analyses of proslavery ideology and abolitionist responses.
  • Historical commentaries on the Lincoln-Douglas debates and their impact.
  • Works exploring constitutional debates during the Civil War period.
  • Studies on the rhetoric used by pro- and anti-slavery advocates.
  • Research on the evolution of American political thought regarding slavery and liberty.