Students Will Submit A Paper That Integrates The Following

Students will submit a paper that integrates the following information into a coherent, clearly written explanation of your career exploration to this point.

Students will include in their paper: 1. Assessments. Discussion of the use of personality, interest, and values assessments in making career decisions in general, and of what your individualized results on these assessments indicate about your possible career options. Include in your discussion the results from your assessments. MBTI: State your MBTI Type.

Discuss if you agree or disagree with the assessment and why. If you disagree, which type do you think is more descriptive of your personality type. Self-Directed Search: State your Summary Code. Discuss what you agree or disagree with the assessment and why. Values Survey and Work Values: State your Top Three Personal Values and your Top Three Work Values. Discuss why these values are important to you. - MBTI test: ESTJ - Self-Directed Search: ESC - Values survey and work values: attached 2. Career Options. Based on your analyses of the career assessments listed above, list two career options that might be interesting to you. Look up the career options you have developed on ONet On‑Line and the Occupations Outlook Handbook. ONet On-Line: ESC 3. College Major. Explore which college majors might be appropriate for your areas of interest, and include a short discussion about which majors or careers you are considering. Majors: Finance and Supply Chain Management The paper must be typewritten, double‑spaced, with subheadings for each subsection (bold items in the description above). Even though this assignment includes 4 sections, it is one essay. Be sure you write it so that it is cohesive and flows from section to section. Upload your paper, as a .pdf file or Word .doc(x), to the Career Exploration Paper folder on Dropbox on BeachBoard before the due date. No Title Page required.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of career exploration requires a comprehensive understanding of one’s personality, interests, and values. These self-assessments provide insight into possible career paths that align with individual preferences and strengths. In this paper, I will discuss my results from the MBTI personality assessment, the Self-Directed Search, and my personal values. I will also explore potential career options and relevant college majors based on these assessments.

Assessments

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) assessment classified me as an ESTJ, often referred to as the “Executive” type. ESTJs are practical, organized, and decisive. They value structure, efficiency, and tend to be natural leaders. I generally agree with this assessment because it reflects my approach to work and social situations. I tend to focus on facts, prefer orderliness, and enjoy leading projects or teams. Nonetheless, I believe I also possess qualities that may not be fully captured by the ESTJ profile, such as creativity or flexibility in certain contexts, but overall, this type resonates with my personality.

The Self-Directed Search (SDS) provided me with a Summary Code of ESC. The code suggests interests in Enterprising (E), Social (S), and Conventional (C) areas. I find this classification partly accurate. I am inclined toward careers involving leadership and social interaction (Enterprising and Social), yet also appreciate the structure and organization characteristic of the Conventional type. I agree with the SDS results, as they align with my preferences for leadership roles, working with others, and valuing stability in work environments.

My top three personal values are Achievement, Respect, and Responsibility, which are vital because they guide my motivations and decision-making processes. Achievement signifies my desire for success and recognition; Respect reflects my importance of maintaining good relationships and integrity; Responsibility emphasizes my commitment to being dependable and accountable. From my work values, the top three are Independence, Job Security, and Opportunities for Advancement. Independence is crucial because I prefer autonomy in work tasks, Job Security provides peace of mind, and Advancement opportunities motivate me to excel and grow professionally.

Career Options

Based on my assessments, two career options that seem fitting are Financial Manager and Supply Chain Manager. These career paths involve leadership, organization, and strategic thinking, which are aligned with my personality type and interests. Research on O*Net OnLine highlights that a Financial Manager oversees financial planning, investments, and financial reporting, often requiring strong organizational and analytical skills—traits consistent with ESTJ and the SDS results. Similarly, a Supply Chain Manager coordinates logistics, procurement, and distribution, demanding efficiency and leadership, again matching my profile.

College Major

Considering my career interests, I am exploring college majors in Finance and Supply Chain Management. A major in Finance would prepare me for roles in financial analysis, investment banking, or corporate finance, emphasizing analytical skills and strategic planning. Alternatively, a Supply Chain Management major offers a pathway into logistics, operations, and procurement, focusing on optimizing processes and resource management. Both majors complement my strong organizational and leadership tendencies, and I am inclined to pursue opportunities in these fields to align my education with my career goals.

Conclusion

In conclusion, self-assessment tools like the MBTI, Self-Directed Search, and personal values surveys have provided invaluable insights into my personality, interests, and priorities. These assessments not only affirm my inclination toward leadership roles in finance and supply chain management but also help clarify the educational paths I should pursue. As I continue my career exploration, I will leverage these insights to make informed decisions that align with my strengths and values, ultimately guiding me toward a fulfilling professional life.

References

• Myers, I. B., & Myers, P. B. (2010). Gifts differing: Understanding personality type. The Myers & Briggs Foundation.
• O*Net OnLine. (2024). https://www.onetonline.org/
• Occupational Outlook Handbook. (2024). U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/
• Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Psychological Assessment Resources.
• Super, D. E. (1980). A life-span development approach to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16(3), 282–298.
• Savickas, M. L. (2013). Career construction theory and practice. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (pp. 147–164). Wiley.
• Neault, R. A., & Pickerell, D. (2011). Career development practice in Canada: Perspectives, principles, and competencies. Thomson Nelson.
• Krumboltz, J. D., & Mitchell, C. J. (1996). The Learning Theory of Career Counseling. Journal of Career Development, 23(1), 13–36.
• Furnham, A., & Miles, J. (1990). Personality and career satisfaction among managers. Personality and Individual Differences, 11(4), 385–398.
• Schmitt, N. (2004). Uses and abuses of personality tests in employment: An overview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 587–601.