Students Will Work With One Of Their Classmates To Analyze

Students Will Work With One Of Their Classmates To Analyze The Career

Students will work with one of their classmates to analyze the career of a well-known person. Teams will choose a well-known person and examine the person’s career. Teams should use relevant career management/development concepts and theories to explain why the person they choose was successful enough to become famous. Teams should also identify the person’s strengths and weaknesses as a way of explaining their success. Teams should present factual information.

The team should use PowerPoint and should bring a hard copy of their slides to class on the day of their presentation. Teams will present in Week 8 of the term (on Tuesday, 5/23). Teams should plan to present for only 10 minutes followed by about 5 minutes of questions from the audience. In total, the presentation and questions should not take more than about 15 minutes.

Paper For Above instruction

Students Will Work With One Of Their Classmates To Analyze The Career

Students Will Work With One Of Their Classmates To Analyze The Career

This assignment involves collaborative analysis where students team up to examine the career of a well-known individual, applying career development theories and concepts to explain their success. The purpose is not only to understand the individual's career trajectory but also to identify key strengths and weaknesses that contributed to their prominence. Students are required to conduct factual research and present their findings through a PowerPoint presentation accompanied by a hard copy of the slides. The presentation must be concise, lasting approximately 10 minutes, followed by a 5-minute Q&A session, all within a 15-minute timeframe.

In choosing a well-known person, students should consider individuals who have achieved significant success in their field, such as famous actors, athletes, business leaders, or politicians. The analysis should incorporate relevant career management theories such as Holland’s RIASEC model, Super’s Life-Span, Life-Space approach, or other applicable frameworks. These theories help to explain why certain career choices, skills, and personal attributes contributed to their success.

Moreover, the analysis should include evaluation of the individual’s strengths—such as skills, education, networking abilities, or personal traits—that helped them excel, as well as weaknesses or challenges faced. Understanding these factors offers insight into career development and management, emphasizing how individuals leverage their strengths and address weaknesses to achieve success.

Preparation should include creating a PowerPoint presentation that clearly outlines the analysis, incorporating visuals, timelines, or data to support claims. The hard copy of the slides should be prepared for distribution or review during the presentation. Effective communication skills, clarity, and engagement are essential during the 10-minute delivery, ensuring that main points are thoroughly covered within the given time.

This assignment offers a practical opportunity to apply career theories to real-life examples, fostering a deeper understanding of career development processes. Successful execution requires collaboration, research, critical thinking, and clear presentation skills, culminating in a comprehensive analysis of a prominent individual’s career and the factors that contributed to their success.

References

  • Super, D. E. (1990). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. In D. Brown & L. Brooks (Eds.), Careers in human resource management (pp. 137–152). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Savickas, M. L. (2013). Career construction theory and practice. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (2nd ed., pp. 147–183). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Rottinghaus, P. J., Aquino, M., & Taub, J. (2009). Integrative life planning: Career development interventions. Routledge.
  • Brown, D., & Lent, R. (2016). Career Development Theories: An Overview. Career Development Quarterly, 64(4), 305-317.
  • Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2013). Social cognitive model of career choice. In S. D. Brown & R. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (2nd ed., pp. 101–127). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Gottfredson, L. S. (2002). Gottfredson's theory of circumscription, compromise, and self-creation. In D. Brown (Ed.), Career Choice and Development (4th ed., pp. 85–148). Jossey-Bass.
  • Nauta, M. M. (2007). Finding the right work: Fit, values, and career development. Journal of Career Assessment, 15(4), 387-409.
  • Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77-124.
  • Jackson, D., & Wilton, N. (2011). Career development and employability: A European perspective. Routledge.

Related Assignments