Students Will Write A 1000-Word Paper On The Pharisees

Students Will Write A 1000 Word Paper On The Pharisees And Luke 736 5

Students will write a 1000 word paper on the Pharisees and Luke 7:36-50. Students will read an article on the Pharisees. They will then write a paper composed of two parts. Part one will communicate the relevant information that the student learned about the Pharisees. Part two will then discuss how the student’s knowledge of the Pharisees helps them better understand Luke 7:36-50.

Paper For Above instruction

The Pharisees occupy a significant place in the landscape of Second Temple Judaism, representing one of the most influential religious groups during the time of Jesus. Historically, the Pharisees are often depicted as devout, meticulous in their adherence to the Law of Moses, and focused on purity and righteousness. Their influence extended beyond the temple priesthood to the broader community, emphasizing oral traditions and interpretations that complemented the written Torah. Understanding their beliefs, practices, and social context is crucial for interpreting their interactions with Jesus and the narratives found in the New Testament, particularly Luke 7:36-50.

The Pharisees emerged in the late Second Temple period as a response to various religious, social, and political challenges facing Judaism. They prioritized adherence to the Torah but also incorporated oral traditions—an evolving body of interpretive guidelines—that helped members of the community understand and apply religious laws. These traditions often served to clarify or expand upon biblical commandments, thus making them more accessible for everyday practice. The Pharisees believed in the resurrection of the dead, angels, and divine judgment, doctrines that distinguished them from other groups such as the Sadducees. Their focus on purity laws and ethical conduct aimed to maintain a holy community and prepare individuals for the age to come.

In terms of social and religious interactions, the Pharisees were often scrutinized by other groups and by Jesus himself. They were sometimes criticized for their strict legalism and outward religiosity, which could result in hypocrisy or a focus on appearances rather than genuine piety. For example, Jesus condemns the Pharisees in Matthew 23 for their outward displays of righteousness while neglecting justice and mercy. Despite these criticisms, it is also evident that many Pharisees, such as Nicodemus, were sympathetic to Jesus’ message and sought to understand and interpret his teachings thoughtfully.

Regarding Luke 7:36-50, this passage narrates a profound interaction between Jesus, a sinful woman, and the Pharisee Simon. The story highlights themes of forgiveness, humility, and genuine repentance. The Pharisee’s reaction to Jesus’ association with the woman reveals a common Pharisaic concern with purity and social reputation, which often conflicted with Jesus’ inclusive approach to sinners. By understanding the Pharisees’ emphasis on moral purity and social status, readers can better grasp the tension in this story. Jesus’ response underscores the importance of inner humility and sincere repentance over superficial religiosity.

Knowledge of the Pharisees helps contextualize Luke 7:36-50 by revealing how their worldview influenced their reactions and expectations. The Pharisees valued ritual purity and moral righteousness, which often led to dismissiveness toward those considered morally impure or socially marginalized. Jesus’ willingness to forgive and elevate the woman contrasts sharply with the Pharisee’s emphasis on observance and social decorum. This contrast exemplifies broader themes in his ministry—highlighting the importance of mercy over ritual compliance and the genuine transformation of the heart.

In conclusion, understanding the Pharisees’ historical, theological, and social background provides critical insights into their interactions with Jesus, especially in Luke 7:36-50. Their emphasis on purity, righteousness, and adherence to tradition shapes their perspectives and responses to Jesus’ message of love and forgiveness. Recognizing these motives allows readers to appreciate the depth of Jesus’ critique of superficial religiosity and his call for authentic humility and repentance. Such understanding not only enriches biblical interpretation but also offers broader lessons on the nature of true righteousness and the importance of compassion in faith communities.

References

• Fitzmyer, J. A. (1981). The Gospel According to Luke I–IX. New York: Doubleday.
• Karris, R. J. (1985). Luke for Everyone. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.
• Schweizer, E. (2001). The Good News According to Luke. Atlanta: John Knox Press.
• Wilkins, M. J. (2012). The Gospel according to Luke. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.
• Johnson, L. T. (2010). The Gospel of Luke. Sacra Pagina Series, Vol. 3. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press.
• Bock, D. L. (2012). Luke. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.
• Hahn, S. (1993). A Catholic View of Luke. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.
• Evans, C. A. (1990). Luke (Understanding the Bible Commentary Series). Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.
• Green, J. B. (1997). The Gospel of Luke. The New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
• Keener, C. S. (2019). The IVP Bible Background Commentary: New Testament. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.