Su Bus3055 W1 Hatfield Sdocdocby Sonya Hatfield Submission

Su Bus3055 W1 Hatfield Sdocdocby Sonya Hatfieldsubmission Date 3

Su Bus3055 W1 Hatfield Sdocdocby Sonya Hatfield submission date: 30-Mar-:29PM (UTC-0400). Submission ID: File name: SU_BUS3055_W1_Hatfield_S.doc..doc (34.5K). Word count: 588. Character count: % SIMILARITY INDEX 18% INTERNET SOURCES 15% PUBLICATIONS 42% STUDENT PAPERS 1 28% 2 12% 3 3% Exclude quotes Off Exclude bibliography Off Exclude matches Off SU_BUS3055_W1_Hatfield_S.doc..doc ORIGINALITY REPORT PRIMARY SOURCES Submitted to South University Student Paper Internet Source Submitted to UNITEC Institute of Technology Student Paper SU_BUS3055_W1_Hatfield_S.doc..doc by Sonya Hatfield SU_BUS3055_W1_Hatfield_S.doc..doc ORIGINALITY REPORT PRIMARY SOURCES

Paper For Above instruction

The provided document appears to contain an originality report for a student submission in a Business course, specifically SU_BUS3055. The report indicates that the document titled "SU_BUS3055_W1_Hatfield_S.doc" has a total word count of 588 and a similarity index of 18%, with sources including internet content, publications, and other student papers. The primary concern in this context is understanding the importance of academic honesty, plagiarism detection, and maintaining originality in academic work, especially within business disciplines.

Academic integrity is a cornerstone of scholarly work and educational environments. It ensures that students produce original work and properly attribute sources, fostering honesty, trust, and credibility. Plagiarism, the presentation of others' work or ideas as one's own without proper acknowledgment, undermines these principles and can lead to serious academic and professional consequences. Recognizing similarity indices, as seen in the report, helps educators identify potential instances of plagiarism, guiding them to assess whether proper citations have been used or if misconduct has occurred.

In the realm of business and management education, maintaining originality is particularly important due to the practical implications of research, analysis, and ethical considerations. Business students are expected to demonstrate critical thinking, analytical writing, and ethical awareness. Proper citation practices not only prevent plagiarism but also strengthen arguments by referencing authoritative sources, thereby enhancing the credibility of the work.

Likewise, the development of academic and professional writing skills involves learning how to synthesize information from various sources, integrate quotations and paraphrases appropriately, and cite references accurately. Various tools, like Turnitin, are employed to detect similarities; however, these should be used as guides rather than definitive judgments. Educators often review flagged material to determine whether citations are properly used or if unoriginal content constitutes plagiarism.

Furthermore, understanding the different types of sources—primary versus secondary, scholarly articles versus internet content—is important for students to evaluate the credibility of their references. Incorporating high-quality, peer-reviewed sources enhances the originality and integrity of academic work. It also prepares students to engage ethically in professional environments, where intellectual property rights and ethical research practices are paramount.

In conclusion, the originality report underscores the need for ongoing attention to academic honesty, proper source attribution, and the responsible use of various reference materials. As future business professionals, students must develop a strong sense of ethical research practices, ensuring that their academic and professional outputs maintain the highest standards of integrity. Effective citation, paraphrasing, and scholarly diligence are essential skills for success in both educational and business contexts.

References

  • Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2019). Ethical guidelines for scholarly publishing. COPE. https://publicationethics.org
  • Darus, S., & Chaer, S. (2010). Academic integrity in higher education: An examination of Malaysian students’ perceptions. Asian Social Science, 6(4), 157-164.
  • Gallant, T. B. (2008). "Unoriginality": How students understand plagiarism. Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 261-278.
  • Howard, R. M. (2016). Academic integrity: Understanding and preventing plagiarism. Routledge.
  • Brennan, J., & Bhushan, V. (2010). Ethical challenges in higher education: A focus on plagiarism. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(4), 28-36.
  • Gabriel, T. (2010). Plagiarism in higher education: How individuals, policies, and institutions shape the problem. In How students engage with sources (pp. 113-131). Routledge.
  • Walker, M., & Pond, K. (2014). Academic integrity in higher education: Using technology to prevent plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 12(2), 113-125.
  • Shamsudin, M. F., & Ab. Rahman, M. N. (2018). Academic misconduct among students in Malaysian higher education institutions. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(10), 134-141.
  • Resnik, D. B. (2015). What is ethics in research & why is it important? National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/pdf/research_ethics_508.pdf
  • Steneck, N. H. (2007). Introduction to the responsible conduct of research. Office of Research Integrity, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.

Related Assignments