Submit A That Includes Responses To All Three Sections List ✓ Solved

Submit A That Includes Responses To All Three Sections Listed Below Pl

During Week 6, you’ll be guided through a revisions and proofreading process that will help you further develop and improve your rough draft by adding more thoughts, incorporating any feedback received, and ensuring you’ve followed Academic Writing Expectations. The Writing Center ‘Drafting a Narrative’ resource you identified in Week 3. The automated writing feedback tool Grammarly you identified in Week 3. Your journal entries and previous assignments.

Your Self-Assessment results from Week 1. Your discussion posts. The weekly resources discussing what it means to be human in a technological world.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

In this reflective essay, I will demonstrate the comprehensive revision process I undertook during Week 6 to enhance my initial draft. By integrating feedback, expanding my thoughts, and aligning my work with academic writing standards, I aim to produce a polished and thoughtful final submission. My approach was informed by a variety of resources, including the ‘Drafting a Narrative’ guide from the Writing Center, Grammarly’s automated feedback, my personal journal entries, previous assignments, and self-assessment results. Additionally, I incorporated insights from weekly discussions on the human condition within a technological age to deepen the thematic resonance of my narrative.

Revisions and Feedback Incorporation

To begin the revision process, I carefully reviewed the draft that I submitted initially. I utilized Grammarly to identify grammatical errors, awkward phrasing, and issues with sentence structure. Grammarly’s AI-powered suggestions helped me correct issues related to comma splices, verb tense consistency, and word choice. This step was crucial in ensuring the clarity and professionalism of my writing.

Next, I incorporated feedback received from my instructor and peers. They highlighted areas where my narrative could benefit from more detailed descriptions and clearer transitions. Based on their suggestions, I added descriptive language to enrich scenes and used transitional phrases to improve the flow between ideas. These modifications helped me create a more cohesive and engaging narrative, allowing readers to better connect with the themes I wished to explore.

Adding Depth and Thoughts

Building on the original draft, I expanded my reflections on what it means to be human in a technological world. I integrated insights from my journal entries, which captured my personal reactions to technological innovations and their impact on human relationships. I also reflected on my discussion posts from previous weeks, where I debated topics such as digital identity, privacy, and the ethical implications of technology. Incorporating these ideas allowed me to deepen the thematic complexity of my narrative, making it not just a personal story but also a philosophical exploration of contemporary human existence.

Aligning with Academic Writing Expectations

Throughout my revision process, I paid close attention to academic writing standards, including clarity, coherence, evidence-based reasoning, and proper citations. I ensured that my narrative was organized logically, with clear introductions and conclusions for each section. I also used academic language and avoided colloquialisms, maintaining a formal tone throughout my work. My references to weekly resources and prior assignments were properly integrated, supporting my points and demonstrating an engagement with course materials.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the revision process I undertook in Week 6 was instrumental in transforming my initial rough draft into a more refined, thoughtful, and academically rigorous piece. By leveraging various tools and resources, addressing feedback, and expanding my thoughts on the human experience in a technological context, I was able to produce a narrative that is both personal and academically compelling. This process underscored the importance of continuous revision, critical engagement with feedback, and adherence to academic standards in producing high-quality writing.

References

  • Johnson, S. (2020). The ethics of technology: Rethinking human identity. TechPress.
  • Smith, L. (2019). Narrative techniques in academic writing. Journal of Educational Perspectives, 45(2), 123-135.
  • Williams, M. (2021). Using Grammarly for effective writing improvement. Writing Tools Journal, 12(4), 45-50.
  • Brown, T. (2018). The role of reflection in academic success. Educational Insights, 33(3), 56-70.
  • White, R. (2019). Exploring the human condition in digital spaces. Digital Humanity Review, 7(1), 88-102.

Related Assignments