Substance-Related And Addictive Disorders Evaluate The Effec ✓ Solved

Substance-related and Addictive disorders Evaluate the effectiveness

Evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic approaches for clients diagnosed with substance-related and addictive disorders. Describe the client (do not use the client’s actual name). Explain your therapeutic approach with the client, including the perceived effectiveness of your approach. Identify any additional information about this client that may potentially impact expected outcomes. Provide specific recommendations for the client to help them in determining why they are not progressing and what your suggested treatment plan consists of. It is useful to consult the Prochaska and DiClement model.

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction

Substance-related and addictive disorders encompass a range of issues tied to the misuse of alcohol, drugs, and other addictive behaviors. The effectiveness of therapeutic approaches to these disorders varies depending on individual circumstances, including the specific substance involved, the client's psychological state, and their support system. For this paper, I will evaluate the therapeutic approach taken with a hypothetical client, whom we will refer to as "John" to preserve confidentiality. John is a 30-year-old male with a history of alcohol use disorder, depression, and anxiety.

Client Profile

John has been struggling with alcohol dependency for five years. He has a familial history of substance misuse, with both his father and grandfather experiencing similar issues. John reports that his use of alcohol escalated following the loss of his job and subsequent relationship breakdown. He often uses alcohol to cope with feelings of inadequacy and hopelessness. Psychological assessments indicate that John exhibits symptoms consistent with major depressive disorder, which complicates his recovery process. This profile is crucial as it establishes a foundation for assessing therapeutic effectiveness and tailoring interventions.

Therapeutic Approach

For John, I employed a combination of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and motivational interviewing (MI). CBT is aimed at addressing the thought patterns and behaviors associated with John's alcohol use, while MI is designed to enhance his intrinsic motivation to change. I initially facilitated sessions three times a week, focusing on building rapport and trust, crucial for successful outcomes.

Through our sessions, we identified cognitive distortions he held, such as "I am a failure" whenever he had a relapse. I guided John through developing healthier coping mechanisms, such as engaging in physical activity and mindfulness practices. Using the Prochaska and DiClemente model of change, we placed John in the contemplation stage, as he acknowledged his problems but was hesitant about maintaining sobriety.

Additionally, I introduced support groups, such as Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) meetings, to foster community and accountability. Over time, John reported positive feedback regarding his feelings of connection in these groups, enhancing his support network.

Perceived Effectiveness of the Approach

The perceived effectiveness of the therapeutic approach can be evaluated through John’s self-reported progress and behavioral changes. Within the first month, John experienced significant shifts; he attended 80% of scheduled therapy sessions and reported reduced alcohol use during the week, transitioning from daily use to only drinking on weekends.

However, challenges arose when his depressive symptoms exacerbated due to external stressors such as financial instability and social isolation. These factors made it difficult for John to fully embrace the therapeutic techniques, suggesting that while the approach had merit, additional support for his mental health was necessary.

Additional Client Information

In addition to John's substance use disorder, it is important to recognize his co-occurring mental health issues. His depression and anxiety significantly impact his recovery process. It is vital to incorporate strategies that address these mental health challenges, as untreated co-occurring disorders can fuel relapse. Regular psychological assessments and coordination with a psychiatrist for possible medication management should be considered integral to his treatment plan.

Moreover, John's support system is weak; he has indicated feelings of shame that prevent him from reaching out to his family and friends. The lack of a strong support network can hinder progress, as social support plays a crucial role in recovery from substance misuse.

Recommendations

To address John's lack of progress, several targeted recommendations can be made:

  • Integrate Dual Diagnosis Treatment: Incorporate specialized therapies that address both substance use and mental health issues. Utilizing evidence-based treatments like Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) could be beneficial for managing emotions effectively while also pursuing sobriety.
  • Enhance Support System: Encourage John to reconnect with empathetic friends or family, and explore community resources, such as peer support groups, to provide ongoing encouragement and accountability.
  • Regular Progress Monitoring: Schedule frequent follow-up assessments to gauge John's mental health status and adjust treatment plans accordingly. This continual evaluation will ensure that both his substance use disorder and mental health needs are being met effectively.
  • Mindfulness Practices: Introduce mindfulness exercises that might help John manage crippling anxiety and depressive symptoms, such as yoga, meditation, or journaling.

Conclusion

In conclusion, addressing substance-related and addictive disorders requires a comprehensive approach that considers not only the addiction itself but also accompanying mental health challenges and social factors. The proposals crafted for John highlight the need for a tailored treatment plan that evolves with his ongoing needs, promoting a holistic path toward recovery. By leveraging therapeutic strategies grounded in evidence, such as CBT and MI, while continuing to engage in supportive environments, John can have a favorable opportunity for lasting change.

References

  • Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2014). Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
  • American Nurses Association. (2014). Psychiatric-mental health nursing: Scope and standards of practice.
  • Gabbard, G.O. (2014). Gabbard’s treatment of psychiatric disorder. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publication.
  • Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change in smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(3), 390-395.
  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  • Smith, R. M., & Cohen, R. E. (2021). The role of motivation in the treatment of substance use disorders. Substance Use & Misuse, 56(3), 345-356.
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2020). Principles of drug addiction treatment: A research-based guide.
  • Tonigan, J. S., Connors, G. J., & Miller, W. R. (2008). Model of the alcohol treatment process. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 69(4), 608-617.
  • Klein, H. (2016). Behavioral approaches to substance abuse treatment: A review of the literature. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 11(1), 42.
  • Marques, A. C., & Daisley, M. (2019). Mindfulness-based interventions for substance use disorders: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 66, 70-83.

Related Assignments