Summary And Comments: The 13th Edition Assignment

Summary And Comments 13the Assignment Is To Read1an Edition Of A Mar

The assignment is to read (1) an edition of a Marxist newspaper and select one article that relates in some way to economic questions or situations and (2) an edition of a traditional newspaper (such as the Washington Post) and select one article that relates in some way to economic questions or situations. The two articles need NOT be on the same topic. The student then writes a summary of each article, followed by a comment on each one. The summary should demonstrate that the student understood the article as written, without any evaluation or opinion whatsoever. The comment should contain the student’s reflection on the article’s content.

The paper must follow the format demonstrated in the sample included under "Course Information" exactly, including section headings. The S&C length should be about 2-4 pages in total. The student’s name, the course name, the number of the S&C, and the date must appear on the upper left-hand corner of the first page of the assignment. It is recommended to use Challenge-Desafio, a Marxist newspaper. A PDF copy of that newspaper is attached.

Please send me correctly the links of the articles that you chose so I can follow up with you! This is my professor’s comment on S&Cs: Your summaries should be shorter, maybe just one paragraph and your comments significantly longer, at least 2 paragraphs. Your insights are more important than the summaries.

Paper For Above instruction

The purpose of this assignment is to critically engage with current economic issues through analyzing articles from both a Marxist perspective and a traditional mainstream perspective. By comparing articles from a Marxist publication such as Challenge-Desafio with a conventional newspaper like The Washington Post, students develop a nuanced understanding of economic discourse and bias, as well as insights into how different ideological frameworks influence the interpretation of economic events.

Introduction

The analysis of contemporary economic topics through diverse journalistic lenses offers valuable insights into the ideological underpinnings shaping society’s understanding of economic phenomena. The choice of articles allows the student to explore issues like capitalism, inequality, labor rights, or government policies, and how these are portrayed within different ideological narratives. While summaries aim to demonstrate comprehension, comments provide an opportunity for critical reflection on the content’s implications, biases, and relevance to broader economic debates.

Selecting Articles and Summarizing

The selection process involves choosing one article from a Marxist publication—such as Challenge-Desafio—that discusses an economic issue, for example, the critique of capitalist exploitation or the role of imperialism in economic inequality. A second article is chosen from a traditional newspaper, which may present the same issue from a more mainstream perspective. Summaries should be concise, roughly one paragraph, clearly capturing the main points of each article without any personal evaluation or critique. This demonstrates understanding of the article’s content and arguments.

Commentary and Critical Reflection

Comments are essential to the assignment and should be substantially longer than summaries, consisting of at least two paragraphs. In these reflections, students analyze the articles’ perspectives, question underlying assumptions, and relate the content to broader economic theories and social issues. For instance, a student might reflect on how the Marxist article critiques capitalist profits and class struggles, contrasted with how the mainstream article might frame economic challenges through policy solutions, market mechanisms, or national interests. The goal is to develop an analytical conversation between the ideological viewpoints and to articulate personal insights about the implications of each perspective.

Formatting and Submission Guidelines

The paper must follow the exact format demonstrated in the provided sample under "Course Information," including section headings such as Introduction, Selection, Summarizing, Commentary, and Conclusion. The entire document should be approximately 2-4 pages, double-spaced. Student information—name, course, assignment number, and date—must appear on the upper left corner of the first page. Proper citation of the articles, including links whenever possible, is required to facilitate the teacher’s follow-up. Adherence to format and length guidelines is essential for successful completion of the assignment.

Conclusion

This assignment encourages critical engagement with economic discourse, emphasizing the importance of understanding ideological framing in media coverage of economic issues. By contrasting perspectives from Marxist and mainstream sources, students gain deeper insight into economic power relations, class struggles, and the ideological debates that influence public opinion and policy. The reflective comments should demonstrate thoughtful analysis of how each article’s perspective shapes perceptions of economic realities and the potential impacts on policy and societal well-being.

References

• Harvey, D. (2010). The Enigma of Capital and the Crises of Capitalism. Oxford University Press.
• Marx, K. (1867). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy.
• Chossudovsky, M. (2003). The Globalization of Poverty and the New World Order. Global Outlook.
• Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Duke University Press.
• Gareau, B. J. (2013). Commodity Chains and Labour in Global Food Production. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42, 197-215.
• Peet, R., & Hartwick, E. (2015). Theories of Development: Contentions, Arguments, Alternatives. Guilford Publications.
• Hicks, D. (2004). International Political Economy: Interests and Institutions in the Global Economy. Routledge.
• Paulson, T. (2012). The Bubble and Beyond: Apocalyptic Forcast for the Global Economy. New York Times.
• Ramaswamy, S. (2012). The Death of the Big Idea: How Media Shapes Our Perception of Economic Crises. Harvard Business Review.
• Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.