Summative Assessment Program Evaluation Design Frias A Membe

Summative Assessment Program Evaluation Design Frias A Member Of The

Summative Assessment: Program Evaluation Design Frias A Member Of The. Create a presentation in which you: Describe the purpose of the evaluation. Evaluate questions and their justifications. Evaluate plan matrixes. Data collection procedures Data analysis procedures Reporting procedures Discuss the measures/instruments (include an example of at least one of these instruments). Identify stakeholders and describe their responsibilities. Record a 10- to 15-minute video in which you share the proposed evaluation design presentation in a professional and precise manner. Upload your presentation to a web-based platform (e.g., YouTubeâ„¢, Vimeo®, etc.) or cloud storage (e.g., OneDrive®, Google Driveâ„¢, DropBox®, etc.). Be sure to set the appropriate viewing/sharing permissions. Note : Do not attempt to submit your presentation as a video file (.mp4, .mov). You must provide a URL link to the material.

Paper For Above instruction

Summative Assessment Program Evaluation Design Frias A Member Of The

The primary goal of any program evaluation is to systematically assess the effectiveness, efficiency, and overall impact of an organization’s programs. In this presentation, I will outline a comprehensive evaluation design tailored to assess a specific initiative or program within an organization. This evaluation aims to inform stakeholders about the program’s strengths and areas for improvement, ultimately supporting informed decision-making and resource allocation.

Purpose of the Evaluation

The purpose of this evaluation is to determine whether the program meets its intended objectives, how effectively it operates, and the extent to which it generates desired outcomes. By systematically examining program processes, outputs, and outcomes, this evaluation seeks to provide actionable insights that can guide future program development, refinement, and sustainability. Additionally, the evaluation aims to ensure accountability to stakeholders, funders, and the community served by the program.

Evaluation Questions and Their Justifications

Key evaluation questions include:

  • What are the specific objectives of the program, and have they been achieved? (Justification: To measure whether the program’s goals align with its outcomes.)
  • How efficiently are resources being utilized? (Justification: To assess cost-effectiveness and fiscal responsibility.)
  • What is the level of participant satisfaction and engagement? (Justification: To evaluate program acceptability and relevance to participants.)
  • What are the short-term and long-term impacts of the program? (Justification: To determine sustainability and broader community benefits.)

Plan Matrices and Data Collection Procedures

Plan matrices serve as a roadmap linking evaluation questions to specific indicators and data sources. For instance, to assess participant satisfaction, the matrix links this question to survey responses and focus group data. Data collection procedures include deploying surveys, conducting interviews, facilitating focus groups, and reviewing program records. Data collection will be conducted at multiple time points (e.g., baseline, mid-term, post-implementation) to capture changes over time and ensure comprehensive evaluation.

Data Analysis Procedures

Quantitative data (e.g., survey scores, attendance records) will be analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, such as means, medians, t-tests, or ANOVA, to identify significant differences or trends. Qualitative data (e.g., interview transcripts, open-ended survey responses) will be subjected to thematic analysis to extract key themes and insights. Integration of quantitative and qualitative findings will offer a holistic understanding of the program’s performance and impact.

Reporting Procedures

The reporting process involves preparing a comprehensive evaluation report highlighting key findings, conclusions, and recommendations. The report will be shared with stakeholders through presentations, executive summaries, and detailed documents. Additionally, recommendations will be contextualized with evidence to support decision-making, and ongoing monitoring frameworks may be suggested to sustain evaluation efforts post-project.

Measures and Instruments

Measures will include standardized surveys, interview guides, focus group protocols, and observational checklists. For example, a participant satisfaction survey might include Likert-scale questions on program relevance, facilitator effectiveness, and overall satisfaction. An example instrument is included below:

Sample Satisfaction Survey Item:


On a scale of 1 to 5, how satisfied are you with the program content?


(1 = Very Dissatisfied, 5 = Very Satisfied)

Stakeholders and Their Responsibilities

Key stakeholders include program administrators, staff, participants, funders, and community representatives. Program administrators are responsible for coordinating evaluation activities, ensuring data quality, and implementing recommendations. Staff provide insights into daily operations and participant engagement. Participants offer valuable feedback through surveys and focus groups. Funders and community representatives oversee accountability, support dissemination of findings, and ensure the evaluation aligns with organizational goals.

Conclusion

This evaluation design provides a structured approach to assessing the program’s effectiveness, efficiency, and impact. By integrating qualitative and quantitative methods, engaging stakeholders, and employing systematic data collection and analysis procedures, the evaluation aims to generate credible and useful insights that will inform program improvements and demonstrate accountability.

References

  • Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. Pearson.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-Focused Evaluation. Sage Publications.
  • Kellogg Foundation. (2004). Logic Model Development Guide. Kellogg Foundation.
  • Freeman, T. (2017). Sampling and sample size in qualitative research. A review of current debates. Expertise in Qualitative Research, 11(2), 145-156.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
  • Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation Thesaurus (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. Sage Publications.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications.
  • Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity With Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. Sage Publications.
  • Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation: Methods for Studying Programs and Policies. Prentice Hall.

Related Assignments