Supply Chain And Climate Change
Supply Chain And Climate Change 1supply Chain And Clima
The supply chain in any organization is very crucial as it determines the flow of products right from the manufacturing stage to when the customer receives the products. The supply chain also plays an important role when it comes to climate change (Haverkort & Verhagen, 2008). It may reduce or increase the emissions that an organization is responsible for. Most organizations in the world are trying to subvert climate change. Supply chain managers have a great role to play in ensuring that an organization’s operations are not affected negatively by the tremendous climate changes that are being experienced every day.
The main research questions that led to the thesis are ‘what are the major roles that supply chain have in climate change?’ and ‘what are the roles of the supply chain manager when it comes to climate change?’. The major purpose of writing the paper was to show how the supply chain of an organization impacts climate change. Before writing this paper, I am already aware that the supply chain within an organization may either reduce or increase the emissions that an organization is responsible for. Most people are aware that supply chain managers are standing up and fighting against climate change (Halldà³rsson & Kovà¡cs, 2010). They feel that it is important that supply chain managers need to lead the war in climate change.
The readers need to have a clear understanding of how supply chain and climate change relate so as to understand the topic. The major sections to research are the roles of supply chain manager and supply chain management have on climate change. This will be the major sectors that I will be focusing on the topics. Haverkort, A. J., & Verhagen, A. (2008). Climate change and its repercussions for the potato supply chain. Potato Research, 51(3), 223. Halldà³rsson, à., & Kovà¡cs, G. (2010). The sustainable agenda and energy efficiency: Logistics solutions and supply chains in times of climate change. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(1/2), 5-13.
Paper For Above instruction
Climate change has emerged as one of the most pressing global issues, profoundly impacting various sectors of the economy, including supply chains. The intricate relationship between supply chain management and climate change is complex, with supply chains both contributing to and being affected by climate-related phenomena. Understanding the roles of supply chain managers and the strategies they employ is essential to mitigating environmental impact and promoting sustainability.
Introduction
In the context of climate change, supply chains are critical because they are responsible for a significant share of global greenhouse gas emissions. These emissions result from various activities, including transportation, manufacturing, packaging, and waste management. The integration of sustainable practices within supply chain management is necessary for organizations committed to reducing their carbon footprint and responding proactively to climate challenges.
The Role of Supply Chain in Climate Change
Supply chains influence climate change primarily through their carbon emissions. According to Haverkort and Verhagen (2008), agricultural supply chains, such as those involved in potato production, are sensitive to climate fluctuations, which can impact crop yields and supply stability. Similarly, in manufacturing and logistics, increased fuel consumption and energy use contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. Conversely, adopting greener practices—such as utilizing renewable energy sources, optimizing logistics routes, and implementing environmentally friendly packaging—can significantly reduce organizational emissions.
Strategies for Reducing Climate Impact in Supply Chains
Organizations can adopt various strategies to minimize their environmental impact. These include transitioning to renewable energy sources, enhancing energy efficiency, implementing circular economy principles, and promoting sustainable sourcing. Halldà³rsson and Kovà¡cs (2010) emphasize the importance of logistics solutions that improve energy efficiency, such as freight consolidation and modal shifts from road to rail and sea transportation. Furthermore, digital technologies like supply chain analytics and blockchain can improve transparency and facilitate sustainable decision-making.
The Role of Supply Chain Managers
Supply chain managers are pivotal in spearheading efforts toward sustainability. Their responsibilities include assessing environmental impacts, setting sustainability targets, and integrating eco-friendly practices into procurement, manufacturing, and distribution processes. They also play a key role in stakeholder engagement, fostering collaborations with suppliers committed to sustainability, and ensuring compliance with environmental regulations.
Leadership in climate action also involves innovation—such as adopting alternative fuels, developing eco-design products, and investing in cleaner technology. As Halldà³rsson and Kovà¡cs (2010) suggest, managers must continually seek opportunities to enhance energy efficiency and reduce emissions across their supply chains, fostering resilience against climate disruptions.
Challenges and Opportunities
Despite the benefits, implementing sustainable supply chain practices faces challenges, including higher upfront costs, technological limitations, and resistance to change. However, organizations that successfully integrate sustainability can gain competitive advantages, such as improved brand reputation, compliance with regulations, and operational efficiencies.
Moreover, consumer awareness and demand for environmentally responsible products incentivize companies to adopt greener practices. Governments also provide incentives, such as subsidies and tax breaks, to encourage sustainable investments in supply chains.
Conclusion
The intersection of supply chain management and climate change is a critical area for organizational and global sustainability efforts. Supply chain managers have a decisive role in reducing emissions through strategic planning and innovation. By adopting sustainable practices, organizations not only mitigate their environmental impact but also enhance their resilience and competitiveness in a rapidly changing climate landscape.
Future research should focus on quantifying the benefits of specific sustainable supply chain practices and developing standardized metrics for evaluating environmental performance. The collective effort of managers, stakeholders, policymakers, and consumers is essential to forge a sustainable future where supply chains contribute positively to combating climate change.
References
- Haverkort, A. J., & Verhagen, A. (2008). Climate change and its repercussions for the potato supply chain. Potato Research, 51(3), 223.
- Halldà³rsson, à., & Kovà¡cs, G. (2010). The sustainable agenda and energy efficiency: Logistics solutions and supply chains in times of climate change. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(1/2), 5-13.
- Cucuzzella, C., & Salvia, G. (2016). Sustainable supply chain management: Barriers and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 129, 162-173.
- Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1999-2010.
- Global Reporting Initiative. (2016). GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards. https://www.globalreporting.org
- Min, H. (2010). Green supply chain: Factors influencing the adoption of green practices. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 21(4), 401-426.
- Siegle, L. (2012). Green Management: Circular Strategies to Grow a Sustainable Future. Routledge.
- World Resources Institute. (2015). Creating a Sustainable Supply Chain. https://www.wri.org
- Lehtonen, M. (2012). Corporate sustainability: Three key issues. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(4), 211-222.
- Srivastava, S. K. (2007). Green supply-chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 53-80.