Support Your Responses With Scholarly References
Support Your Responses With Scholarly Academic References
Support your responses with scholarly academic references using APA style format. Assigned course readings and online library resources are preferred. Weekly lecture notes are designed as overviews to the topic for the respective week and should not serve as a citation or reference. In your discussion question response, provide a substantive response that illustrates a well-reasoned and thoughtful response; is factually correct with relevant scholarly citations, references, and examples that demonstrates a clear connection to the readings. In your participation responses to your peers, comments must demonstrate thorough analysis of postings and extends meaningful discussion by building on previous postings.
Note: Review South University’s Substantive Participation Policy Criteria, Helpful Tips, and Late Policy available by clicking on the South University Policy and Guidelines navigation tab. The late policy applies to late discussion question responses.
Paper For Above instruction
The provided discussion questions pose vital explorations regarding theory development, application, and conceptual comparison within nursing. To construct a comprehensive response, it is essential to uncover the intricate linkages between research inquiries, theory origins, and their practical implications in clinical settings. This paper delves into potential research questions that stimulate theory generation, examines a nursing theory's genesis, and explores the philosophical differences between two prominent nurse theorists, highlighting their relevance in practice.
Research Questions as Triggers for Theory Development
Research questions serve as catalysts for theoretical advancement by identifying gaps and unexplored phenomena within the discipline. For example, in nursing, questions such as "How does patient engagement influence recovery outcomes?" or "What are the coping strategies used by nurses dealing with moral distress?" generate empirical data that can inform or challenge existing frameworks. Additionally, questions like "What factors contribute to effective communication among interdisciplinary teams?" can lead to the development of theories explaining collaborative processes. Such inquiries do not merely seek immediate answers but aim to construct or refine conceptual models that enhance understanding and practice. According to Chinn and Kramer (2018), research questions that explore relationships among variables, the context of phenomena, or causal influences are especially fertile grounds for theory development because they provide the foundation for constructing propositions and models (Chinn & Kramer, 2018).
Origins of a Nursing Theory: The Case of Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory
One exemplary theory in clinical practice is Dorothea Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory. Its origins can be traced to the dynamic needs of patients who require assistance in maintaining health. The historical context of the nursing profession significantly impacted its development; during the mid-20th century, there was a shift towards a more scientific and autonomous nursing discipline, emphasizing patient independence and holistic care (Fawcett & Garity, 2020). Orem’s theory was motivated by a recognition that nurses should not solely perform tasks but empower patients through self-care practices. She cited existing evidence on the importance of patient participation, health promotion, and the impact of self-care abilities on health outcomes. Her motivation was rooted in advancing nursing as a practical profession that supports individual autonomy, grounded in both empirical evidence and her observations of patient care dynamics (Fawcett & Garity, 2020). The theory synthesizes values of autonomy, dignity, and holistic well-being, reflecting the profession’s evolving focus on patient-centered care.
Comparison of Nursing Philosophies: Benner and Henderson
Patricia Benner and Virginia Henderson offer fundamentally different yet complementary philosophical perspectives in nursing. Benner’s theory, detailed in her "From Novice to Expert" framework, emphasizes skill acquisition through experiential learning. Her main idea is that nurses develop expertise via clinical practice, progressing through levels of proficiency that influence decision-making and patient interaction (Benner, 1984). Core concepts include skill acquisition, clinical judgment, and professional growth, with the relationships among them suggesting that experience and reflection enhance competence.
In contrast, Henderson’s philosophy centers on the concept of assisting patients in achieving independence in activities contributing to health, with her “Definition of Nursing” highlighting fourteen basic needs as fundamental to nursing practice (Henderson, 1966). Her main concepts include patient independence, holistic care, and the nurse’s role as an educator, collaborator, and caregiver. Henderson articulates that addressing the patient’s essential needs fosters independence, which in turn positively affects health outcomes.
The relationship between concepts in Benner’s theory posits that increased clinical experience and reflection enhance nursing judgment, thereby improving patient care. In Henderson’s philosophy, the concept of patient independence directly affects overall health status; when nurses successfully aid patients in meeting their needs, independence and well-being improve. Different concepts influence each other: in Benner’s model, expert judgment promotes better care, whereas in Henderson’s approach, facilitating independence enhances health stability.
Practical Application: A Clinical Example
In a pediatric intensive care unit, both philosophies find relevance. A nurse utilizing Benner’s framework applies experiential learning to recognize subtle changes in a child's vital signs, advancing from novice to expert to anticipate complications proactively. Simultaneously, Henderson’s principles guide the nurse in ensuring the child's basic needs—such as comfort, hydration, and safety—are met, fostering development toward independence as they recover. These philosophies inform practice by emphasizing clinical acumen developed through experience and the holistic goal of enabling patient autonomy, respectively. Together, they promote comprehensive, evidence-based, and empathetic care.
Conclusion
Understanding research questions that promote theory development, the origins of core nursing theories, and the philosophical differences among influential theorists enriches nursing knowledge and practice. Research-driven inquiry advances theoretical frameworks, which in turn inform clinical applications. Comparing the philosophies of Benner and Henderson reveals the diverse yet interconnected ways nursing conceptualizes patient care—highlighting the importance of experience, clinical judgment, and patient independence. These insights underscore the ongoing evolution of nursing as a discipline committed to holistic, evidence-based, and patient-centered care.
References
Benner, P. (1984). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Prentice-Hall.
Chinn, P. L., & Kramer, M. K. (2018). Integrated theory and knowledge development in nursing (9th ed.). Elsevier.
Fawcett, J., & Garity, J. (2020). Nursing theory: Utilization & application (6th ed.). F.A. Davis Company.
Henderson, V. (1966). The nature of nursing: A definition and its implications for practice, research, and education.
Reed, P. G. (2017). Contemporary nursing knowledge: Analysis and evaluation of nursing models and theories. Springer.
Smith, M. J., & Parker, M. E. (2015). Nursing theories and nursing practice. F.A. Davis Company.
Tierney, A. J. (2020). Theory development and research in nursing (2nd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Wesson, C., & Olivares, S. (2018). Scholarship of discovery, integration, application, and teaching: Critical elements of research in nursing. Nursing Science Quarterly.
Williams, S. D., & McHugh, M. D. (2016). Evidence-based practice in nursing. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Yonge, O., & Myrick, F. (2016). Caring connections: The cornerstone of nursing. Nursing Forum.