Supporting Service Financial Costs Per Charger

Supporting Service Financial Servicescost Driver Per Chargerational

Supporting Service: Financial Services

Cost Driver: Per charge

Rationale: Financial services support three centers but are most likely to be impacted by the volume of charges submitted. Volume of charges is a more specific cost driver than total patients because it accounts for all activities the financial center manages related to billing and collections from each center. Using charges submitted as a cost driver allows for a more accurate representation of the workload and resource utilization within the financial services department, as it directly correlates with the volume of billing activity rather than overall patient numbers, which may not directly translate to the financial processes involved.

Supporting Service: Facilities

Cost Driver: Direct Labor Hours

Rationale: Maintenance tickets can be submitted for each job performed, which include the direct labor hours spent by technicians. This metric enables tracking of technician effort for each maintenance activity, providing insight into resource utilization. Furthermore, it allows for differentiation among labor types, such as specialized technicians who might incur higher costs. By using direct labor hours as the cost driver, the department can allocate costs based on actual effort rather than generalized measures like total square footage or number of facilities, leading to more precise cost management and resource planning.

Supporting Service: Housekeeping

Cost Driver: Per Patient

Rationale: While housekeeping services have significant fixed costs associated with routine cleaning, costs tend to increase with patient volume, especially due to room turnovers and increased activity in common areas. By establishing patient volume as a cost driver, fixed costs can be modeled as variable in relation to patient numbers, reflecting real resource demands more accurately. This approach accounts for the dynamic nature of housekeeping needs and helps in budgeting and resource allocation based on expected patient throughput for each center.

Supporting Service: Administration

Cost Driver: Per Center

Rationale: Administrative costs are largely fixed on a per-center basis, with each center requiring dedicated administrative support. Although there may be variability in administrative needs between centers, the fundamental cost structure suggests that a cost driver based on the number of centers is appropriate. As new centers are added, additional administrative resources are typically necessary. This simplifies cost allocation and provides a straightforward method to estimate administrative expenses aligned with the number of operational centers.

Supporting Service: Personnel

Cost Driver: Open and Filled Positions

Rationale: Human resource activities increase with the number of employees at each center, including recruiting, onboarding, and ongoing personnel management. By considering both open and filled positions as the activity measure, the model captures the total personnel management workload, which rises with staffing levels and activity. This approach allows for more accurate cost attribution related to the personnel department’s efforts in supporting staffing needs and administrative tasks associated with human resources management across all centers.

Paper For Above instruction

Effective cost allocation in healthcare organizations requires careful identification of appropriate cost drivers that accurately reflect resource utilization across various supporting services. These services include financial, facilities, housekeeping, administration, and personnel functions, each of which is associated with distinct activities and resource demands. Properly assigning cost drivers ensures that each department's expenses are allocated to the relevant centers in a manner that supports efficient management and financial transparency.

Financial services are primarily driven by the volume of charges submitted rather than patient volume alone, because billing activities are more directly correlated with the number of charges processed. This approach provides a precise measure of activity, allowing for better resource planning and cost control. For instance, a higher number of submitted charges indicates more complex billing procedures, increased staffing needs in the billing department, and higher administrative overheads. Consequently, using charges as a cost driver enables a department-wide understanding of workload fluctuations and resource allocation efficiencies.

Similarly, facilities maintenance efforts are best measured through direct labor hours, as they directly capture the effort involved in repair and maintenance activities. Tracking labor hours for each maintenance job performed offers a granular understanding of resource use and facilitates cost attribution based on actual effort. Differentiating labor hours by technician specialization further enhances accuracy, as different types of technicians (e.g., general vs. specialized technical staff) have varying cost profiles. Over time, this detailed approach helps identify inefficiencies and areas for cost savings in maintenance operations.

For housekeeping services, the cost driver of choice is per patient, because while a significant fixed cost exists for routine cleaning, operational demands increase with patient turnover and activity levels. Using patient volume allows the organization to model housekeeping costs as variable, aligning expenses with actual demand. During periods of high patient volume, increased cleaning and sanitation activities are necessary, whereas costs decrease during off-peak times. This dynamic model improves budgeting accuracy and resource planning, ensuring that staffing levels and cleaning supplies are aligned with real need.

The administrative support function predominantly incurs fixed costs per center, as each location tends to require dedicated administrative staff and resources. The number of centers directly influences administrative staffing needs, making the per-center cost driver an appropriate choice. Although administrative complexity may vary among centers, this simplified approach facilitates scalability and ease of cost allocation, especially when detailed data on administrative workload is unavailable or difficult to standardize.

Personnel costs, reflecting HR department efforts, are driven by both the number of open positions and those filled, as HR activities encompass recruiting, onboarding, and ongoing personnel management for all staff. Using a combined measure capturing open and filled positions effectively reflects the total activity involved in managing human resources. As staffing levels grow or shrink, HR activities correspondingly increase or decrease, making this an accurate and practical cost driver for personnel-related costs across multiple centers.

In conclusion, selecting appropriate cost drivers tailored to specific supporting services enhances the accuracy of cost allocation, provides better insights into operational efficiencies, and supports strategic decision-making in healthcare management. Each driver — whether volume of charges, labor hours, patient counts, number of centers, or staffing levels — aligns with the underlying activities responsible for incurring costs, ultimately fostering better resource utilization and financial transparency in healthcare organizations.

References

• Drury, C. (2013). Management and Cost Accounting. Cengage Learning.
• Driscoll, P., & Starling, N. (2015). The role of activity-based costing in healthcare. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 29(5), 654-666.
• Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., & Rajan, M. (2015). Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis. Pearson Education.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Atkinson, A. A. (2015). Advanced Management Accounting. Pearson Education.
• McLaughlin, D. (2018). Cost Management in Healthcare. Routledge.
• Rebsamen, S. P. (2017). Healthcare Cost Allocation: Techniques for Managing Resources. Health Economics Review, 7, 12.
• Tan, J., & Birnbaum, D. (2016). Strategies in Healthcare Cost Management. Journal of Healthcare Management, 61(2), 136-145.
• Tonks, J., & Coughlan, M. (2014). Cost Drivers and Cost Allocation in Healthcare. Financial Accountability & Management, 30(3), 247-267.
• Zwass, V. (2014). Healthcare Cost Management and Control. Journal of Operations Management, 32(1), 40-54.
• American Hospital Association. (2020). Financial Management in Healthcare. AHA Publishing.