Table 3.2 Microdrive Inc. Summary Of Financial Ratios

Table 3 2 Microdrive Inc Summary Of Financial Ratios Millions Of Do

This report provides an analysis of the financial ratios of Microdrive Inc., based on the provided summary of financial ratios in millions of dollars. The ratios are critical in assessing the company's liquidity, asset management, debt management, profitability, and market evaluation. An understanding of these ratios offers insights into the company's financial health, operational efficiency, and market perception.

Introduction

Financial ratio analysis is an essential tool for evaluating a company's performance and financial stability (Brigham & Houston, 2021). It offers a quantitative measure that compares different aspects of financial statements, such as profitability, liquidity, and leverage (Higgins, 2018). Macro and microeconomic factors can influence these ratios, but for Microdrive Inc., the ratios indicate areas of strength and concern that merit detailed discussion. This analysis aims to interpret these ratios in context, compare them against industry averages, and assess overall financial health.

Liquidity Ratios

Liquidity ratios measure a company's ability to meet its short-term obligations. Microdrive’s current ratio of 3.2 signifies a strong liquidity position, given that it is well above the industry average of 1.1. However, the quick ratio, at 1.1 (industry average 1.1), indicates that the company’s more liquid assets (excluding inventories) are just sufficient to cover current liabilities. Although acceptable, this ratio suggests limited margin for error in meeting immediate obligations without liquidating inventories.

Asset Management Ratios

The inventory turnover ratio of 4.0 is significantly lower than industry standards, indicating that Microdrive takes longer to sell its inventory. This can tie up capital and increase storage costs (Higgins, 2018). Similarly, the days sales outstanding (DSO) of 45 days exceeds typical industry benchmarks, reflecting a policy of extended credit terms or collection inefficiencies (Brigham & Houston, 2021). The fixed assets turnover of 3.0, compared to an industry average of 3.0, suggests that the company utilizes its fixed assets effectively. However, the total assets turnover ratio of 1.8 points to underperformance, as it is below the industry norm of 2.0, possibly indicating excess or inefficient asset deployment (Higgins, 2018).

Debt Management Ratios

Microdrive’s debt ratio of 53.2%, considerably higher than the industry average of 40%, indicates increased leverage, which elevates financial risk (Brigham & Houston, 2021). While leverage can amplify returns, it also exposes the company to higher bankruptcy risk, especially if cash flows become strained. The times-interest-earned (TIE) ratio of 3.0, which is considered low, signals vulnerability to interest rate fluctuations and declining earnings. Similarly, the EBITDA coverage ratio of 3.3 indicates that earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization are only just sufficient to cover debt obligations, suggesting a potentially risky financial structure (Higgins, 2018).

Profitability Ratios

Profit margins are notably low, with a profit margin on sales of 3.8%, below the industry average of 5%. This indicates that Microdrive's efficiency in converting sales into profit is weak (Brigham & Houston, 2021). The basic earning power (BEP) of 14.2% is also below the industry average of 17.2%, reflecting limited operating efficiency. Return on total assets (ROA) at 5.7%, and return on equity (ROE) at 12.7%, further highlight subpar profitability compared to industry standards. These indicators suggest that the company struggles to generate adequate returns from its assets and equity (Higgins, 2018).

Market Value Ratios

Microdrive’s share price is $23.00, with an earnings per share (EPS) of $2.27, resulting in a relatively low P/E ratio of 10.5 compared to typical market multiples. This indicates that investors may have modest growth expectations or perceive higher risks associated with the company (Brigham & Houston, 2021). The price-to-cash flow ratio of 5.8 and market-to-book ratio of 1.7 further reflect that the company's stock is undervalued relative to its cash flows and book value, respectively. However, these valuations also imply that the market assigns a conservative valuation to Microdrive’s future prospects (Higgins, 2018).

Conclusion

In summary, Microdrive Inc. demonstrates a strong liquidity position, with ratios exceeding industry averages. However, its asset management efficiency is lacking, especially in inventory turnover and DSO, potentially affecting cash flow and operational efficiency. The high debt levels and low coverage ratios indicate increased financial risk, compounded by relatively weak profitability and market valuation metrics. To improve its financial health, Microdrive should focus on optimizing asset utilization, reducing leverage, and enhancing operational efficiency to bolster profitability and investor confidence.

References

• Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2021). Fundamentals of Financial Management (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Higgins, R. C. (2018). Analysis for Financial Management (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R., & Jaffe, J. (2021). Corporate Finance (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Peterson, P. P., & Fabozzi, F. J. (2020). Financial Management and Analysis. Wiley.
• Penman, S. H. (2013). Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Gibson, C. H. (2018). Financial Reporting & Analysis (14th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Revsine, L., Collins, W. W., Johnson, W. B., & Mittelstaedt, F. H. (2015). Financial Reporting & Analysis. Pearson.
• De Franco, G., & Alon, I. (2021). Corporate financial management: Theory and practice. Springer.
• Horne, J. C., & Wachowicz, J. M. (2018). Fundamentals of Financial Management (13th ed.). Pearson.
• Myers, S. C. (2019). Capital Structure. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(3), 81–102.