Take Away Concepts: Describe The Framework And Its Relation

Take Away Conceptslo 12 1describe The Framework And Its Relationship T

Take Away Conceptslo 12 1describe The Framework And Its Relationship T

Take-Away Concepts LO 12-1 Describe the framework and its relationship to competitive advantage. Companies increasingly recognize that value creation should not be limited to financial performance alone. Instead, they should focus on creating shared value—simultaneously generating economic benefits for the company and social benefits for society. This shared value creation framework seeks to identify the connections between economic and social needs, leveraging these connections to develop a sustained competitive advantage. The approach emphasizes aligning business strategies with societal improvements, thereby fostering innovation, improving productivity, and expanding access to markets.

LO 12-2 explains the role of corporate governance in guiding company behavior. Corporate governance involves mechanisms to direct and control an enterprise, ensuring strategic goals are pursued effectively and ethically. It aims to address the principal-agent problem, where managers (agents) act on behalf of shareholders (principals). Effective governance mechanisms help align the interests of managers with those of shareholders, reducing agency costs and fostering trust among stakeholders.

LO 12-3 applies agency theory to illustrate how governance mechanisms function to align interests. Since principals and agents have different information and goals, governance mechanisms such as performance-based incentives, monitoring systems, and contractual tools are implemented to mitigate issues like adverse selection and moral hazard. By reducing asymmetries in information and aligning incentives, these mechanisms help ensure that managers act in the best interests of shareholders and the organization.

LO 12-4 assesses the board of directors as a key governance mechanism for publicly traded companies. Shareholders, as legal owners, elect the board to represent their interests. The board oversees management, which executes daily operations under the CEO’s leadership. Inside directors typically include senior executives like the CFO and COO, while outside directors are independent professionals who bring external perspectives. The board’s effectiveness is critical in providing strategic guidance, oversight, and accountability to secure long-term shareholder value.

LO 12-5 evaluates other governance mechanisms, including executive compensation, the market for corporate control, financial statement auditors, government regulators, and industry analysts. Executive pay, particularly CEO compensation, reflects ongoing debates concerning fairness and performance linkage. The market for corporate control acts as an external discipline, with activist investors seeking to improve underperforming firms. Financial statements reviewed by auditors and regulators provide transparency and help stakeholders make informed decisions. These mechanisms collectively strengthen governance structures and improve company accountability.

LO 12-6 explains the relationship between strategy and business ethics. Pursuing competitive advantage ethically builds a foundation for sustainable, long-term success. While legal compliance is fundamental, ethical conduct extends beyond the law, reflecting the company’s integrity and social responsibilities. Managers should adhere to codes of conduct that uphold high standards and enforce consequences for misconduct, fostering trust, reputation, and social legitimacy.

The recent economic downturn in the USA prompted many companies to explore expansion into the European Union (EU) as a strategic response for survival and growth. This process involves analyzing advantages and disadvantages of entering European markets to determine feasibility. Thorough market research is essential to understand cultural differences, regulatory environments, and economic conditions to ensure a good fit. Identifying barriers and devising strategies to overcome them is critical for successful expansion.

Entering the EU market can offer significant benefits such as access to a large customer base, lower barriers to entry, and favorable tax environments. Purchasing an existing company via merger can be a strategic move, allowing immediate market access, resource sharing, and cost efficiencies. Establishing subsidiaries and extension offices further enhances market presence, facilitating local operations and customer engagement. As European economies tend to be more stable and finance options more accessible, these advantages make expansion attractive for multinational corporations.

Understanding the cultural landscape and regulatory framework is crucial for a seamless transition. Regular visits and engagement with local authorities help gain insights into industry practices, legal requirements, and economic trends. These efforts help ensure compliance and adapt strategies to local conditions, ultimately increasing the probability of success. Additionally, the creation of jobs and contribution to the local economy can improve a company's reputation and foster goodwill, which are vital for sustainable expansion.

Given the various benefits, such as simplified tax regimes, lower restrictions on foreign investments, and favorable financial conditions, European expansion presents a strategic opportunity for growth. However, it needs meticulous planning, informed decision-making, and adaptation to cultural differences. When managed properly, such expansion can lead to increased profitability, diversified revenue streams, and strengthened global competitiveness.

References

  • Blair, M. M., & Stout, L. A. (Eds.). (2019). Corporations, Governance, and Value Creation. Cambridge University Press.
  • Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77.
  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783.
  • Solomon, J. (2017). Corporate Governance and Accountability. Wiley.
  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
  • Baron, D. P. (2001). Private Politics, Corporate Social Events, and Public Policy Response. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 20(1), 7-15.
  • Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383-396.
  • Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1-2), 51–71.
  • Cadbury, A. (1992). The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. The Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, Gee and Co Ltd.