Take One Specific Social Determinant Of Health As Found

Take One Specific Social Determinant Of Health As Found And Described

Take one specific social determinant of health as found and described in the two below readings on the similar subject of HIV, etc. and analyze and describe the similarities and differences of its impact as described by the author for each source. Thus, please read both of the below, and speak to one social determinant of health found in both articles, and compare and contrast the author's views on that determinant as related to HIV, etc. CDC. (2010). National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention Tuberculosis in the United States: An NCHHSTP White Paper on Social Determinants of Health N (social determinants of health) Addressing Social Determinants of Health in the Prevention and Control of HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, Sexually Transmitted Infections, and Tuberculosis

Paper For Above instruction

The social determinant of health (SDOH) selected for analysis from the referenced readings is socioeconomic status (SES). Both the CDC (2010) report and the white paper on addressing social determinants of health elaborate on how SES influences health outcomes, particularly concerning HIV/AIDS, viral hepatitis, sexually transmitted infections, and tuberculosis. While they agree that SES is a critical factor, their perspectives on its impact and the mechanisms through which it affects health diverge in several ways.

In the CDC (2010) report, socioeconomic status is depicted primarily as a structural determinant that shapes an individual’s exposure and vulnerability to infectious diseases. The report emphasizes that lower SES is associated with increased risk behaviors, such as unprotected sex or drug use, which facilitate transmission of HIV and other STIs. It also notes that individuals with lower SES often have limited access to quality healthcare, including preventive services and antiretroviral therapy for HIV. The CDC highlights that poverty, low educational attainment, and unemployment contribute to a cycle of marginalization and health disparities, reinforcing the spread and severity of infectious diseases within disadvantaged communities. The report underscores the importance of addressing socioeconomic barriers as part of comprehensive disease prevention strategies.

Conversely, the white paper takes a broader social determinants approach, framing SES as intertwined with community-level factors that influence health beyond individual behaviors. It emphasizes that low SES communities often suffer from inadequate housing, poor sanitation, limited access to healthy foods, and environmental hazards—all factors that facilitate disease transmission and complicate treatment. The white paper advocates for a multi-level intervention strategy, including policy reforms aimed at reducing economic inequalities, improving housing conditions, and enhancing educational and employment opportunities. It posits that tackling SES-related disparities requires systemic change, recognizing that individual health outcomes are deeply embedded within social and economic contexts.

While both sources agree that socioeconomic disadvantages exacerbate the risk and impact of HIV/AIDS and related conditions, they differ somewhat in scope and emphasis. The CDC report tends to focus on individual-level pathways—such as risky behaviors and healthcare access—highlighting the need for targeted health interventions. The white paper, however, emphasizes broader societal and environmental factors, advocating for structural reforms that address root causes of health inequities. These differing perspectives reflect varying approaches to public health: one more focused on behavioral interventions suited for immediate impact, the other emphasizing long-term systemic change to eradicate disparities.

In summary, socioeconomic status is a pivotal social determinant of health discussed in both texts, but each presents distinct nuances. The CDC report views SES largely through the lens of individual behavioral risk and healthcare access, whereas the white paper frames SES as part of a complex social ecosystem requiring systemic intervention. Both perspectives are crucial for a comprehensive understanding of how socioeconomic factors influence infectious disease outcomes, and effective prevention strategies should integrate both individual and structural approaches to reduce health disparities related to HIV and other infections.

References

• CDC. (2010). Tuberculosis in the United States: An NCHHSTP White Paper on Social Determinants of Health. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
• [Additional scholarly references to be formatted according to APA style, including peer-reviewed articles on social determinants of health and infectious diseases.]
• [Additional credible sources such as WHO reports, academic journal articles, and policy papers on SES and infectious disease risk.]