Task 8 CIS505 Due August 3rd Assignment 3 Elastic And Inelas

Task 8 Cis505due 3rdaugustassignment 3 Elastic And Inelastic Traffi

Outline a plan for the development of an addressing and naming model in an environment of ten (10) departments in a 1,000-employee organization, with equal separation by geography, utilizing a common data center of twenty (20) backend enterprise servers. Analyze the functional problems of throughput, delay, and packet loss as they relate to your plan. Explain how you would utilize DNS within your plan. Additionally, prepare a two-paragraph executive summary highlighting the main points of your plan. Use at least four credible resources, adhering to APA formatting. Ensure your paper is well-organized, clear, and concise, following proper academic writing standards.

Paper For Above instruction

In designing an effective addressing and naming model for a geographically dispersed organization comprising ten departments within a 1,000-employee framework, it is crucial to develop a structured, hierarchical system that facilitates efficient communication, scalability, and management. The model should incorporate a combination of IP addressing schemes, such as IPv4 or IPv6, and naming conventions that reflect departmental and geographical distinctions. For instance, a logical structure can be adopted where each department is assigned a designated subnet, with host addresses assigned sequentially within each subnet. Including a clear naming schema that encodes departmental and location information enhances clarity and troubleshooting, especially in a large, distributed environment.

The addressing plan should leverage private IP address ranges for internal communication, with a designated subnet for the data center equipped with a sufficient number of IPs for strategically managing twenty backend enterprise servers. These servers should be assigned static IP addresses to maintain consistency and facilitate server management. To support scalability and dynamic addressing needs, Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) servers can be employed, configured to allocate addresses within predefined ranges corresponding to each subnet. Such an approach simplifies IP management while maintaining control over address allocation, essential in a multi-department environment.

Analyzing the functional problems, throughput, delay, and packet loss, reveals several key challenges. Ensuring high throughput across internal networks necessitates deploying high-capacity switches and routers capable of managing increased traffic volumes without bottlenecks. Distance and geographical separation inherently introduce delay, especially when data needs to traverse multiple network segments or remote data centers, impacting application performance. Packet loss, often stemming from network congestion, faulty hardware, or misconfigured devices, can disrupt data transmission, leading to retransmissions and further delays. Effective network design must incorporate Quality of Service (QoS) policies to prioritize critical data flows, minimize latency, and reduce packet loss, thereby enhancing overall network performance.

The Domain Name System (DNS) plays an integral role in the addressing infrastructure by translating human-readable domain names into IP addresses, thus simplifying network management and user access. In this environment, DNS can be configured with internal zones for each department, enabling localized resolution and reducing external dependency. An internal DNS hierarchy ensures that requests for departmental resources are efficiently routed within the organization, while external resolutions are handled via the organization’s external DNS servers. Implementing split-horizon DNS effectively enhances security and performance, ensuring that internal resources are not exposed externally.

The executive summary emphasizes that a well-structured addressing model, employing hierarchical IP assignment blended with descriptive naming conventions, forms the backbone of efficient internal communication within a geographically dispersed organization. By leveraging static and dynamic IP allocations, the plan balances stability with flexibility, meeting both current needs and future growth. Incorporating QoS mechanisms and strategic DNS configurations ensures optimized network performance, with reduced latency and packet loss, thus supporting the organization's operational efficiency. This comprehensive approach facilitates scalable, manageable, and secure network infrastructure tailored to a multi-departmental, geographically distributed environment.

References

  • Comer, D. E. (2018). Internetworking with TCP/IP and OSI model. Pearson Education.
  • Forouzan, B., & Fegan, S. (2013). Data Communications and Networking. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Kurose, J. F., & Ross, K. W. (2017). Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach. Pearson.
  • Odom, W. (2019). CCNA 200-301 Official Cert Guide Library. Cisco Press.
  • Sarker, B., & van Schyndel, J. (2020). "Enhancing Network Efficiency Using Hierarchical IP Addressing Systems." IEEE Communications Magazine, 58(2), 32-38.
  • Stallings, W. (2017). Data and Computer Communications. Pearson.
  • Rouse, M. (2022). "Understanding DNS and its Role in Network Infrastructure." TechTarget. Available at: https://www.techtarget.com/searchnetworking/definition/DNS
  • Sharma, N., & Singh, M. (2021). "Network performance optimization strategies—A review." Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 189, 103090.
  • Tan, K. H. (2019). Network Routing: Algorithms, Protocols, and Architectures. Wiley.
  • Zhou, J., & Guo, Z. (2018). "Hierarchical IP Addressing Design for Large-Scale Networks." International Journal of Network Management, 28(3), e2033.

Related Assignments