Task Review: Your Chosen Project Scenario From W1

Task Review Your Chosen Project Scenario Fromw1 Taskplease Care

Review your chosen project scenario from W1. Carefully read the attached Project Scope Statement (PSS) assignment guidance. Individually, create a Project Scope Statement (PSS). Submit the PSS to the Blackboard W3 individual assignment site by the end of day (11:59 ET), Sunday, Week 3. The assignment should be formatted with double line spacing between paragraphs, 1.5 spacing within paragraphs, 12-point Times Roman font, 1-inch margins, and include footnotes or endnotes with citations. Use 12-14-point font, bold headings and subheadings, and adhere to APA conventions.

Paper For Above instruction

The task at hand involves reviewing a previously selected project scenario, thoroughly understanding the scope as outlined in the provided Project Scope Statement (PSS) guidance, and subsequently creating a comprehensive Project Scope Statement. This process is crucial for clearly defining the boundaries, deliverables, and objectives of the project, ensuring all stakeholders are aligned and expectations are managed effectively.

Understanding and drafting an effective Project Scope Statement begins with a detailed review of the project scenario, which frames the context in which the scope is developed. The PSS serves as a foundational document that encapsulates the project’s purpose, key deliverables, assumptions, constraints, and exclusions. It provides clarity and sets the direction for subsequent planning and execution phases. As an individual task, the focus is on precision, clarity, and adherence to established guidelines, including format and citation standards.

In developing the scope statement, it is vital to identify the project’s main objectives and ensure they are SMART—Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. This helps in maintaining focus and facilitating effective communication across the project team and stakeholders. Additionally, the scope statement should delineate what is included and excluded from the project, as well as any assumptions or constraints that could impact the project’s success.

The formatting requirements emphasize professionalism and consistency, which are essential for clarity and presentation. Using double spacing between paragraphs ensures readability, while 1.5 spacing within paragraphs avoids overly dense text. The choice of Times New Roman at 12-point size is standard for academic and professional documents. Proper margins, along with bold headings and subheadings, facilitate easy navigation of the document. Citing sources through footnotes or endnotes, following APA conventions, ensures academic integrity and supports credibility of the content.

Submission deadlines emphasize timeliness, with the completed PSS due by Sunday at 11:59 ET in Week 3. This schedule encourages effective time management and allows for review and feedback prior to project execution. Overall, this assignment reinforces key project management principles, including scope definition, documentation, and professional presentation, which are essential skills for managing complex projects successfully.

References

  • Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (6th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Author.
  • Schwalbe, K. (2018). Information technology project management (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
  • Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Mir, F. A., & Pinnington, A. H. (2014). Exploring the value of project management: Linking Project Management Performance and Project Success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 202–217.
  • Larson, E. W., & Gray, C. F. (2018). Project management: The managerial process (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Heldman, K. (2018). PMP project management professional exam guide. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J. (2017). Project management: A managerial approach (9th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Wysocki, R. K. (2014). Effective project management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme. Indianapolis, IN: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Lock, D. (2013). Project management (10th ed.). Farnham: Gower Publishing.
  • Heagney, J. (2016). fundamentals of project management (5th ed.). New York, NY: AMACOM.

Related Assignments