TCO 1 The Department Manager Has Asked You To Create A Repor

1tco 1 The Department Manager Has Asked You To Create a Report In the

1. (TCO 1) The department manager has asked you to create a report in Access. What are some of the questions that you would ask to determine what should be on the report? For one of your questions, give an example of two different answers the manager might give and tell how each answer would affect the report design.

2. (TCO 2) What does it mean to store data in its smallest parts, and why is this important?

3. (TCO 4) From first normal form, second normal form, or third normal form, select one of these forms and explain (1) how that normal form is often violated by inexperienced database designers and (2) how to correct such a violation of that normal form.

4. (TCO 4) When constructing a database, two rules are followed by the database designer to ensure the integrity of keys. Describe each rule and discuss common violations.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Effective database design and reporting are critical components in managing organizational data efficiently. When creating reports in Microsoft Access, understanding what information to include requires asking targeted questions. Additionally, managing data storage at its most granular level, normalizing databases properly, and maintaining key integrity are essential for robust database systems. This paper explores these topics in detail, providing insights into best practices and common pitfalls encountered by database designers.

Questions for Report Design and Their Impact

When tasked with creating a report in Access, a key initial step involves gathering requirements through a series of strategic questions. These questions help define the scope, data sources, and purpose of the report. Typical questions include:

• What is the main objective of the report? For example, is it to show sales performance, inventory levels, or employee hours?
• Who is the intended audience? Management, department staff, or external stakeholders?
• What specific data fields are necessary? For instance, do we need customer names, transaction dates, or product details?
• What is the desired format? Should it be tabular, summary, or detailed?
• Are there specific filters or criteria to include or exclude data?

Focusing on one question, such as "What is the purpose of the report?", yields varying answers. Suppose a manager responds with:

• "To review monthly sales totals." — This leads to a report that consolidates data into summary totals, possibly grouped by product or region, emphasizing aggregate information.
• "To analyze individual sales transactions." — In contrast, this prompts a detailed report listing every sale with specific transaction data, requiring a different layout and filtering options.

Each answer significantly impacts report design, influencing the level of detail, grouping, sorting, and overall presentation. Clear communication ensures the report aligns with user needs and facilitates better decision-making.

The Importance of Storing Data in its Smallest Parts

Data normalization involves storing information in its smallest meaningful units. For example, rather than storing a full customer address in one field, it would be broken down into separate fields for street, city, state, and ZIP code. Similarly, storing a full name as "John A. Smith" could be split into first name, middle initial, and last name.

This approach offers several advantages. First, it minimizes redundancy—reducing the volume of stored data and preventing inconsistencies. Second, it enhances data integrity, making it easier to update or correct individual elements without affecting others. Third, it improves query flexibility, allowing precise filtering or aggregation based on specific data parts.

For instance, storing a customer's city separately enables targeted queries about geographic regions without parsing unstructured address fields. Overall, storing data in its smallest parts supports efficient data management, consistency, and accurate analysis.

Normalization: Violations and Corrections in Database Design

Focusing on the second normal form (2NF), especially relevant for database normalization, offers insight into common design issues. 2NF requires that all non-key attributes depend fully on the primary key, eliminating partial dependencies. Inexperienced designers often violate 2NF when they create tables where non-key attributes depend only on part of a composite primary key. For example, in a sales database, if a table uses a combined primary key of OrderID and ProductID, but includes ProductDescription, which depends only on ProductID, it violates 2NF.

Such violations lead to redundancy, update anomalies, and data inconsistency. To correct this, the designer should normalize the database by splitting the table into two: one for order details with OrderID and ProductID, and another for products with ProductID as the primary key and ProductDescription as an attribute. This ensures that each piece of data resides in the appropriate table, maintaining data integrity and minimizing redundancy.

Ensuring Key Integrity: Rules and Violations

Two fundamental rules maintain the integrity of keys in database design:

1. Primary Keys Must Be Unique and Not Null: Each record must be uniquely identifiable by its primary key, and this key cannot be null. Violations occur when duplicates are allowed or when a primary key is omitted, leading to ambiguity or difficulty in data retrieval.
2. Foreign Keys Must Reference Existing Records: Foreign keys in one table must correspond to primary keys in related tables, ensuring referential integrity. Violations include orphaned records or foreign keys pointing to non-existent records, which compromise data consistency.

Common violations include creating duplicate primary keys by mistake or failing to enforce foreign key constraints in database definitions. These issues can result in data anomalies, difficulty in maintaining data consistency, and inaccurate reporting. To prevent such violations, database designers should implement constraints during table creation, enforce referential integrity settings, and routinely validate data integrity.

Conclusion

Creating effective reports in Access requires detailed understanding of user requirements, especially the purpose and audience of the report. Using targeted questions helps clarify these needs and informs report design. Normalization and storing data in its smallest parts are fundamental for maintaining data integrity, reducing redundancy, and enabling flexible querying. Furthermore, strict adherence to key integrity rules safeguards the consistency and reliability of the database. By following these principles, database designers can develop robust, efficient, and accurate systems that support organizational goals effectively.

References

• Database Systems (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Database Design and Relational Theory: Normal Forms and Beyond. Springer.
• Fundamentals of Database Systems (7th ed.). Pearson.
• An Introduction to Database Systems (8th ed.). Addison-Wesley.
• SQL: The Complete Reference (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Database System Concepts (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Data Normalization and Designing Relational Databases. Journal of Computing, 9(4), 259-266.
• Data Mining Techniques: For Marketing, Sales, and Customer Relationship Management. Wiley.
• Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Management. Cengage Learning.
• Effective Database Design with SQL and MySQL. O'Reilly Media.