Team Dynamics - 100 Points Document Must Be Microsoft Word O

Team Dynamics 100 Points Document Must Be Microsoft Word Onlycont

Contemplate a time when you were part of a team. It can be a well-functioning, high performing team, or a total disaster. Based on your reflections on that experience, answer the following (1-2 pages): Provide an overview of the context and description of the team. Was the team high or low functioning? Explain. What was your particular role on the team? How did you contribute to the team (both positively and negatively as applicable)? Comment on the extent to which the following elements were positive, negative or at times, both: Leadership Vision & Objectives Skills Cohesion Resources Incentives How will you personally drive higher performance in your next group project? Additional notes for this assignment: Write using a formal business style as if you were writing a closing report. Submit your assignment using MSWord. Double space and use a reasonable font (there's nothing wrong with 12 point Times New Roman!). Each of the above five elements should be a separate paragraph. For element #4, do not just say "the leadership was good. The vision was good..." You need to explain and discuss why. Previous Next

Paper For Above instruction

The team experience I reflect upon took place during a university group project, where the objective was to develop a comprehensive marketing plan for a local business. The team comprised four members, each with distinct roles and responsibilities. Overall, the team was highly functioning, demonstrating effective communication, shared goals, and mutual respect, which contributed to the successful completion of the project within the stipulated timeline.

My role within the team was that of the coordinator and research analyst. I was responsible for gathering market data, analyzing competitors, and integrating these insights into our strategic recommendations. I contributed positively by organizing our meetings, ensuring deadlines were met, and synthesizing various ideas into coherent sections of the plan. However, I recognize that at times, my desire for structure may have slowed down spontaneous brainstorming sessions, potentially limiting creative exploration.

The leadership within the team was marked by clear direction and encouragement. Our team leader set definite objectives from the outset, establishing a vision for a successful marketing campaign designed to increase the client’s visibility and sales. The leadership fostered an environment where everyone felt empowered to share ideas, and while they maintained control over project deadlines, they also delegated tasks effectively. This approach helped in maintaining focus and motivation among team members, which contributed positively to team cohesion and overall performance. The vision was aligned with high standards, pushing us to deliver a comprehensive and professional plan.

The skills within the team ranged from strategic thinking to creative development, and technical expertise to data analysis. While most members possessed the necessary skills to fulfill their roles, occasional gaps in market research techniques and presentation skills were evident. These gaps initially hindered our efficiency, requiring additional time for revisions. Over time, members supplemented each other’s skills through collaboration, which improved the team’s overall competence. The development of skills was a positive element but initially posed challenges that required collective effort to overcome.

Cohesion in the team was notably high. From the beginning, members demonstrated a strong commitment to the common goal, maintained open communication, and supported one another. Regular meetings fostered trust and transparency, enabling us to resolve conflicts quickly and keep the project moving forward. This cohesion translated into heightened motivation and accountability, ensuring individual contributions aligned with team objectives. The cohesive environment significantly contributed to the success of the project.

Resources available to the team included access to relevant databases, marketing tools, and software applications such as SWOT analysis templates and presentation software. While most resources were readily accessible, some limitations in advanced data analytics tools slowed certain aspects of research. The team compensated by utilizing free online resources and seeking guidance from professors on best practices. Incentives were primarily intrinsic, such as academic recognition and personal growth, which motivated sustained effort. These resources and incentives combined to facilitate timely and effective work.

In our upcoming group projects, I intend to enhance our team’s performance by promoting clearer communication channels, establishing roles early, and implementing regular check-ins to monitor progress. Additionally, I would advocate for incorporating diverse skill sets from the beginning and fostering a culture that balances structure with creativity. Personally, I will strive to be more adaptive and open to spontaneous ideas while maintaining organization. These steps should lead to more innovative solutions and improved efficiency in team endeavors.

References

• Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2017). Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills. Pearson.
• Belbin, R. M. (2010). Team Roles at Work. Oxford University Press.
• Wheelan, S. A. (2014). Creating Effective Teams: A Guide for Members and Leaders. SAGE Publications.
• Lencioni, P. (2002). The Five Dysfunctions of a Team: A Leadership Fable. Jossey-Bass.
• Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances. Harvard Business School Press.
• Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application. Sage Publications.
• West, M. A. (2012). Effective Teamwork: Practical Lessons from Organizational Research. Wiley-Blackwell.
• Salas, E., Cooke, N. J., & Rosen, M. A. (2008). On Teams, Teamwork, and Team Performance: Discoveries and Developments. Human Factors, 50(3), 540–547.
• Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376.
• Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in Organizations: From Input-Process-Outcome Models to Evolving Interactions. American Psychologist, 60(4), 339–352.