Team Leadership Management Style Part 1 According To 848461

Team Leadershipmanagement Stylepart 1according To The Sarin And Oco

Team Leadership/Management Style Part 1: According to the Sarin and O’Connor (2009) article, certain style and goal structures of team leaders have a strong influence on internal team dynamics. Based on your research within the article and textbook, as well as your own experience, what team leader management style would be most effective in leading a team in which you were a member? Part 2: DeRue, Barnes, and Morgeson (2010) found that team leadership style effectiveness depended on the level of charisma exhibited by the leader. Drawing from the article and the textbook, have you ever worked for a charismatic leader? What style (coaching or directing) did that leader administer? Was he or she effective in leading you as part of the team?

Paper For Above instruction

Effective team leadership is critical for fostering a productive and cohesive team environment, and selecting the appropriate management style can significantly influence team dynamics and performance. Drawing upon the insights from Sarin and O’Connor (2009), as well as DeRue, Barnes, and Morgeson (2010), it becomes evident that a nuanced understanding of leadership styles, goals, and leader charisma can inform the most effective management strategies in team settings.

According to Sarin and O’Connor (2009), leadership styles are primarily categorized based on their goal structures and behavioral patterns. These styles include transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership, each bearing distinct implications for team cohesion and motivation. Transformational leadership, which emphasizes inspiration, vision, and intellectual stimulation, tends to foster innovation and commitment within teams. Transactional leadership, focused on task completion and reward-punishment dynamics, is effective in maintaining order and meeting specific goals. In contrast, laissez-faire leadership, characterized by minimal intervention, often hampers team performance due to lack of guidance.

In my opinion, the most effective management style in leading a team would be transformational leadership. This style encourages team members to align their personal goals with team objectives and fosters a sense of shared purpose. Transformational leaders inspire trust and enthusiasm, which enhances motivation and commitment among team members. For instance, based on my professional experience, teams led by transformational leaders often display higher levels of innovation and engagement, which ultimately leads to better overall outcomes. Such leaders communicate a compelling vision, empower team members, and support their professional development, creating a positive work environment conducive to productivity.

Furthermore, DeRue, Barnes, and Morgeson (2010) highlight the importance of leader charisma in influencing leadership effectiveness. Their research indicates that charismatic leaders can inspire and energize teams, especially when their leadership style aligns with team needs and individual member characteristics. Charisma, as a personal attribute, enhances the leader’s influence and can significantly sway team dynamics.

Reflecting on my experiences, I have worked under a charismatic leader who predominantly used a coaching style. This leader exhibited high levels of personal magnetism and was able to motivate team members through individualized attention and encouragement. Their leadership combined elements of transformational and coaching styles—leading by inspiring vision while personally mentoring team members. This leader's effectiveness was apparent—they fostered a supportive environment that encouraged growth and innovation. The team responded positively because the leader effectively communicated expectations, recognized individual strengths, and provided personalized feedback, which cultivated high morale and productivity.

In conclusion, the most effective management style depends on various factors, including team composition, goals, and leader attributes such as charisma. Transformational leadership, supported by charismatic traits, appears most effective across diverse settings by fostering motivation, engagement, and innovation. Understanding these dynamics enables leaders to adapt their approaches to optimize team performance and satisfaction.

References

• Sarin, S., & O’Connor, G. C. (2009). Dynamic team leadership. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(4), 435-448.
• DeRue, D. S., Barnes, C. M., & Morgeson, F. P. (2010). Understanding leader charisma and its impact on team effectiveness. Leadership Quarterly, 21(5), 735-750.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. Free Press.
• Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in Organizations (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Antonakis, J., & House, R. J. (2014). The full-range leadership theory: The way forward. In D. V. Day (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (pp. 76-95). Oxford University Press.
• Riggio, R. E. (2018). Introduction to leadership: Concepts and practice. Sage Publications.
• Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 78-90.
• Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire Manual. Mind Garden.
• Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Sage Publications.