Teamwork Approach Includes Team Members From Different
Teamworka Teamwork Approach Includes Team Members From Different Disc
Teamwork. A teamwork approach includes team members from different disciplines working collaboratively, for a common purpose, to set goals; make decisions and share resources and responsibilities. During the team work, a group of clinicians from different disciplines, come together with the patient, perform assessment, make a diagnosis, intervene, and set goals. The patient and their family are also involved in any discussions about the patient condition, prognosis, and care plan (O'Reilly, Lee, O'Sullivan, Cullen, Kennedy, & MacFarlane, 2017). In interdisciplinary teamwork, communication across disciplines and with the patient and their family is vital to setting the goals that most exactly reflect the patient’s healthcare needs.
In my experience, I had an opportunity to work with a nursing assistant to give a bath for a client and a physiotherapist to ambulate a patient who had general weakness during my clinical. As a student nurse, I was just following both times, and they were coordinating the care we gave to the clients. During both situations, the patient’s outcomes were positive because the plan was to give a bath for the first patient and ambulate the second one to improve muscle strength. I personally liked both experiences because it was a valuable educational event to interact with patients.
Paper For Above instruction
Interdisciplinary teamwork in healthcare is a cornerstone of delivering comprehensive, patient-centered care. It involves professionals from various disciplines collaborating effectively to ensure optimal health outcomes. This approach leverages diverse expertise, shared goals, and coordinated efforts to address complex health issues, ultimately benefiting patients through well-rounded and personalized care plans.
Introduction
In modern healthcare, the significance of teamwork cannot be overstated. The complexity of patient needs, especially in primary care and chronic disease management, necessitates a coordinated effort among healthcare professionals. Interdisciplinary teamwork ensures that care is holistic, cohesive, and aligned with the patient’s preferences and needs. This paper discusses the principles of interdisciplinary teamwork, reflects on practical experiences, and explores the importance of communication and shared decision-making in delivering effective healthcare services.
Principles of Interdisciplinary Teamwork
The core principles of interdisciplinary teamwork include shared goals, mutual respect, open communication, and accountability. According to O'Reilly et al. (2017), effective team functioning relies heavily on normalisation process theory, which emphasizes how team members integrate and embed collaborative practices into routine care. The team members must understand each other's roles, accept diverse perspectives, and work cohesively despite disciplinary differences. Clear communication is essential for aligning goals, sharing information, and avoiding overlaps or gaps in care. Furthermore, shared responsibilities foster a sense of collective ownership and accountability for patient outcomes.
Practical Experience of Interdisciplinary Collaboration
Reflecting on personal clinical experiences, collaboration with nursing assistants and physiotherapists exemplifies the practical benefits of teamwork. For instance, assisting with a patient’s bath alongside a nursing assistant demonstrated the importance of coordinated efforts to meet basic patient needs effectively. Similarly, observing and supporting a physiotherapist in ambulating a patient with muscle weakness highlighted how interdisciplinary efforts can improve physical function and overall health. These experiences underscored the significance of clear communication, role clarity, and mutual support among team members to achieve positive patient outcomes. The success of such collaborative efforts depends on understanding each team member’s contribution and maintaining open dialogue.
Importance of Communication and Family Participation
Effective communication among team members, patients, and their families is indispensable in the interdisciplinary model. As O'Reilly et al. (2017) articulate, engaging patients and their families in care discussions ensures that goals are aligned with the patient’s preferences, cultural values, and social context. This participatory approach fosters trust, enhances adherence to treatment plans, and leads to better health outcomes. Open, honest, and respectful communication channels help address concerns promptly, clarify expectations, and build strong therapeutic relationships. Family involvement provides additional insights into the patient's condition and supports continuity of care beyond clinical settings.
Challenges and Facilitators of Teamwork
While interdisciplinary teamwork offers numerous benefits, it also faces challenges such as role ambiguity, differing professional cultures, and communication barriers. To overcome these hurdles, healthcare organizations should promote a culture of respect, shared purpose, and ongoing training. Leadership plays a vital role in facilitating collaboration by setting clear expectations, providing resources, and fostering an environment conducive to teamwork. The implementation of tools like care coordination protocols and electronic health records enhances communication efficiency and information sharing across disciplines.
Conclusion
Interdisciplinary teamwork is essential for delivering holistic, patient-centered care. It relies on the synergy of diverse healthcare professionals working collaboratively with patients and families. Effective communication, shared goals, and mutual respect are fundamental to successful teamwork. Personal clinical experiences demonstrate how coordinated efforts improve patient outcomes and satisfaction. As healthcare continues to evolve, fostering strong interdisciplinary teams will remain a key strategy in addressing complex health challenges and improving the quality of care delivered.
References
- O'Reilly, P., Lee, S. H., O'Sullivan, M., Cullen, W., Kennedy, C., & MacFarlane, A. (2017). Assessing the facilitators and barriers of interdisciplinary team working in primary care using normalisation process theory: An integrative review. PloS One, 12(5), e0176201. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176201
- Reeves, S., Pelone, F., Harrison, R., Goldman, J., & Zwarenstein, M. (2017). Interprofessional collaboration to improve health outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (6). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3
- Hall, P. (2005). Interprofessional teamwork: Professional cultures as barriers. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(sup1), 188-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820500081745
- Stille, C. J., McKinney, C., & Vargo, J. (2014). Building an interprofessional team: Strategies for school nurses. Journal of School Nursing, 30(2), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059840513514167
- Interprofessional Education Collaborative. (2016). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016 update. Washington, DC: Interprofessional Education Collaborative Executive Committee.
- World Health Organization. (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. Geneva, WHO.
- Gittell, J. H. (2016). Transforming relationships for high performance: The power of relational coordination. Bridgewell Publishing.
- Reeves, S., Perrier, L., Goldman, J., Freeth, D., & Zwarenstein, M. (2013). Interprofessional education: Effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (update). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002213.pub3
- Zwarenstein, M., Goldman, J., & Reeves, S. (2009). Interprofessional collaboration: Effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub2
- Beach, M. C., et al. (2010). Cultural Competence in Health Care: Emerging frameworks, practice, and educational strategies. Medical Care Research and Review, 67(4), 442-458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558710361270